Efficacy and Safety Study of Netarsudil 0.02% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate 0.4% Ophthalmic Solution in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
A Single-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Parallel-group, 4-week Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% Compared to Twice Daily Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.4% in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
1 other identifier
interventional
245
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% QD to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.4% BID, for Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Over A 4-Week Period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 27, 2023
CompletedFebruary 27, 2023
February 1, 2023
7 months
October 26, 2020
December 13, 2022
February 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Comparison of both groups mean diurnal IOP at Week 4 (Day 29). IOP will be measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Mean diurnal IOP was calculated as the average of 3 IOP values across 09:00, 11:00 and 16:00 time points.
29 Days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
IOP at Weeks 1 and 2
Day 8, Day 15
Mean Change IOP From Baseline at Days 8, 15, 29
Baseline (Day 1), Days 8, 15, 29
Study Arms (2)
Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% and netarsudil ophthalmic solution vehicle
EXPERIMENTAL1 drop netarsudil 0.02% in the evening and 1 drop netarsudil vehicle in the morning in each eye.
Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 drop ripasudil twice daily in the morning and evening in each eye.
Interventions
Topical sterile ophthalmic solution Other Name: Rhopressa®
Other Name: Glanatec®
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Diagnosis of POAG or OHT in both eyes (POAG in one eye and OHT in the fellow eye was acceptable)
- Medicated intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 14 mmHg in at least one eye and \< 30 mmHg in both eyes at screening visit
- For POAG eyes, unmedicated (post washout) IOP ≥ 15 mmHg and \< 35 mmHg in the study eye at 2 qualification visits (09:00 hours), 2-7 days apart. At second qualification visit IOP ≥ 15 mmHg and \< 35 mmHg at 11:00 and 16:00 hour (in the same eye).
- For OHT eyes, unmedicated (post washout) IOP ≥ 22 mmHg and \< 35 mmHg in the study eye at 2 qualification visits (09:00 hours), 2-7 days apart. At second qualification visit IOP ≥ 22 mmHg and \< 35 mmHg at 11:00 and 16:00 hours (in the same eye)
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) +0.7 log MAR or better (20/100 Snellen or better or 0.20 or better in decimal unit) in each eye
- Willingness and ability to give signed informed consent and follow study instructions
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant ocular disease
- Retinal diseases that may progress during the study period
- Pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component glaucoma, history of angle closure glaucoma, or narrow angles
- Previous glaucoma intraocular surgery
- Refractive surgery in either eye
- Ocular hyperemia score of moderate (+2) or severe (+3) at Qualification Visit #2
- Ocular trauma
- Ocular infection or inflammation
- Any corneal disease that may confound assessment
- Evidence of corneal deposits or cornea verticillata
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%, or to topical anesthetic.
- Mean central corneal thickness \>620 um
- Any abnormality preventing reliable Goldmann applanation tonometry of either eye (e.g. keratoconus)
- Cannot demonstrate proper delivery of the eye drop
- Clinically significant systemic disease
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seijo Clinic
Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Araie M, Sugiyama K, Aso K, Kanemoto K, Iwata R, Hollander DA, Senchyna M, Kopczynski CC. Phase 3 Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Netarsudil to Ripasudil in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Japan Rho Kinase Elevated Intraocular Pressure Treatment Trial (J-ROCKET). Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4639-4656. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02550-w. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
PMID: 37603205DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle Senchyna, PhD. VP, Clinical Development and Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Aerie Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joella Kittrell
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- This study adopted a single-masked study design. Treatment assignments were masked to the Investigator, the clinical study team (Sponsor, designated personnel involved in day-to-day study management, Monitors, Data Managers, and Statisticians), and the subjects for the duration of the study. The netarsudil and ripasudil bottles were different in the study, however, investigators and subjects were masked to study drug assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2020
First Posted
November 6, 2020
Study Start
November 30, 2020
Primary Completion
July 9, 2021
Study Completion
July 30, 2021
Last Updated
February 27, 2023
Results First Posted
February 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share