LIFUP for Treatment of Motor Deficits in Parkinson's Disease
LIFUP PD
Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation for Treatment of Motor Deficits in Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will test the feasibility of using Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) to treat motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD). LIFUP is a new technique that can increase brain activity in highly specific target areas and is MRI compatible. Thus, in real-time, it is possible to directly observe how LIFUP changes the brain areas important in PD by measuring its effects on brain activity, blood flow, and brain connectivity. If successful, this research will mark the first step towards a novel, non-invasive, non-medication treatment for PD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 4, 2026
CompletedFebruary 4, 2026
August 1, 2024
2.1 years
October 3, 2020
November 18, 2025
January 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Motor Assessment 1: Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Section 3
The participant will complete a 18-item comprehensive motor assessment that assesses elements of motor function including tremor, bradykinesia, and gait. The total score for this assessment ranges from 0 to 108 points, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Motor Assessment 2: Finger Tapping (Score)
This task, which is item 3.4 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), asks participants to tap their index finger on their thumb ten times as big and as fast as possible. Participants scores on item 3.4 with standard UPDRS scoring criteria (on a scale of 0 to 4, where a higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's symptoms i.e. worse performance) will be assessed pre and post-LIFUP. The scores reported below are for the hand on the side with worse symptoms (i.e. the side that LIFUP is intended to primarily affect).
Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Motor Assessment 2: Finger Tapping (Speed)
This task, which is item 3.4 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), asks participants to tap their index finger on their thumb ten times as big and as fast as possible. The speed of taps will be assessed pre and post-LIFUP. Speed is calculated as \[number of taps per second\] times \[average tap amplitude\], where tap amplitude is measured on a scale of 0.0-1.0 representing the percentage of finger extension between taps, where e.g. extension to a 90 degree angle between thumb and index finger = 1.0, extension to 45 degree angle = 0.5, etc. Higher speed indicates better performance. The speed values reported below are for the hand on the side with worse symptoms (i.e. the side that LIFUP is intended to primarily affect).
Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Motor Assessment 2: 9-Hole Pegboard Dexterity Test
The participant will place and remove nine plastic pegs into a plastic pegboard. Scores are recorded as time in seconds that it takes the participant to complete the task with each hand. Analysis will compare pre- and post-treatment scores to quantify motor performance improvements.
Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difference in BOLD fMRI Signal Between on vs. Off Blocks
During LIFUP (or sham) sonication on Day 1 and Day 15
Perfusion Changes in Internal Globus Pallidus, External Globus Pallidus, and Putamen
Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Study Arms (2)
Active, then Sham
EXPERIMENTALActive Low intensity focused ultrasound pulsation (LIFUP) will be administered to the internal globus pallidus while participants are in the MRI scanner. Then, 2 weeks later, sham LIFUP will be administered.
Sham, then Active
EXPERIMENTALSham low intensity focused ultrasound pulsation (LIFUP) will be administered while participants are in the MRI scanner. Then, 2 weeks later, active LIFUP will be administered to the internal globus pallidus.
Interventions
Low intensity focused ultrasound pulsation will be administered to the internal globus pallidus in 20 sonications at 650kHz, ispta.3 720mW/cm, pulse repetition frequency 100Hz, duty cycle 5%, duration 30s with 30s spacing between sonications. For active LIFUP, the device will be used with a gel pad that allows the ultrasound to pass through.
The device will be aimed at the internal globus pallidus and turned on with the same settings as the active condition; however, in this case, the device will be used with a gel pad that blocks the ultrasound from passing through, such that no ultrasound is actually being administered to the brain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease
- Age 18-85
- Fluent in the English language
You may not qualify if:
- Metal implants that are not MR compatible
- Neurological diagnosis other than Parkinson's
- Not fluent in the English language
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Natalie Rotstein
- Organization
- University of California Los Angeles
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan Y Bookheimer, Ph.D.
University of California, Los Angeles
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All participants complete two identical in-person testing and LIFUP sessions. At one session, the device will be used with a gel pad that allows ultrasound to pass through, and at the other session, it will be used with a gel pad that blocks the ultrasound. The order of conditions is randomized and counterbalanced across participants. The two gel pads look identical beyond a label differentiating them, and neither the participants nor the person administering ultrasound will know whether sham or active is being administered at a given session.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2020
First Posted
October 20, 2020
Study Start
June 15, 2022
Primary Completion
July 24, 2024
Study Completion
July 31, 2024
Last Updated
February 4, 2026
Results First Posted
February 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-08