Internal Iliac Artery Ligation During Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Validity of Internal Iliac Artery Ligation With Cervico Isthmic Compression Suture During Conservative Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vessels ligation have been used as a part of conservative management in treatment of placenta accrete spectrum to decrease blood loss as uterine artery ligation and internal iliac artery ligation. Surgical ligation of the anterior divisions of the internal iliac artery is practiced by many tertiary care centers during management of women with PAS disorders. However there is no recommendation toward the routine use of internal iliac artery ligation before bladder dissection during conservative management of (placenta accrete spectrum). The retroperitoneal space will be dissected and bifurcation of common iliac vessels will be identified, After identifying the ureter, the internal iliac artery will be dissected on both sides away from surrounding tissues and from adjacent iliac vein. The anterior branch of each internal iliac artery will be then prophylactically ligated using suture ligation approximately 2-3 cm distal to common iliac artery bifurcation in order to avoid ligation of the posterior division. Principal investigators will conduct a study to evaluate the efficacy of internal iliac artery ligation before bladder dissection during conservative management using cervico isthmic compression suture in cases of Placenta accrete spectrum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2022
CompletedApril 6, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.3 years
October 12, 2020
April 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Estimation of blood loss
The sum of a) Difference in Towels weighting dry \& soaked . b) Volume of blood in suction apparatus. estimating the difference in Hemoglobin and Hematocrit before and after operation. estimating the number of packed red blood cells units transfused.
During surgery from the start of uterine incision till closure of abdominal wall
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complication rates,
from the induction of anesthesia till 24 hours after the end of surgery
Study Arms (2)
Internal iliac artery group
ACTIVE COMPARATORBilateral internal Iliac artery ligation will be done followed by urinary bladder dissection then bilateral uterine artery ligation then manual removal of the placenta then cervico isthmic compression suture. (holding the upper border of the cervix by 4 Allis's forceps then suturing the cervix with the anterior uterine wall using continuous suture), Nelaton catheter18 gauge or Hegar's dilator will be inserted inside cervical canal during Cervico isthmic tamponed suture to ensure patency of cervical canal. .
No internal iliac artery group
OTHERBladder dissection then bilateral uterine artery ligation then cervico isthmic suture without internal iliac artery ligation
Interventions
Retroperitoneal approach will be performed to ligate both internal iliac arteries before bladder dissection followed by cervicoisthmic compression suture application at placental bed
Bladder dissection followed by cervicoisthmic compression suture application at placental bed without Internal iliac artery ligation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant female age between 18\_35 years.
- History of ' 3 caesarean deliveries or less .
- Pregnant female diagnosed to have none complicated medical disorders e.g. Uncontrolled hypertension, Uncontrolled preeclampsia, Uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus .
- If ≥2 of the following criteria present by trans abdominal ultrasound and color Doppler examination:
- a-Loss of clear zone c-Placental lacunae. e-Placental bulge. g-Utero-vesical. hyper vascularity. i-Bridging vessels. b-Myometrial thinning. d-Bladder wall interruption. f-Focal exophytic mass. h-Subplacental.hyper vascularity. j-Lacunae feeder vessels.
- Placenta increta or percreta according to FIGO classification (2019)including:
- \. Grade II(FIGO 2019 ) 8:Abnormally invasive placenta (Increta)
- Clinical criteria):
- At laparotomy Abnormal macroscopic findings over the placental bed: bluish/purple coloring, distension (placental "bulge").
- Significant amounts of hyper vascularity (dense tangled bed of vessels or multiple vessels running parallel craniocaudally in the uterine serosa).
- No placental tissue seen to be invading through the uterine serosa. Gentle cord traction results in the uterus being pulled inwards without separation of the placenta (so-called the dimple sign).
- Histologic criteria:
- Hysterectomy specimen or partial myometrial resection of the increta area shows placental villi within the muscular fibers and sometimes in the lumen of the deep uterine vasculature (radial or arcuate arteries),if failed conservative therapy.
- \. Grade III(FIGO 2019)8: Abnormally invasive placenta (Percreta) Grade 3a: Limited to the uterine serosa Clinical criteria At laparotomy Abnormal macroscopic findings on uterine serosal surface (as above) and placental tissue seen to be invading through the surface of the uterus.
- No invasion into any other organ, including the posterior wall of the bladder (a clear surgical plan can be identified between bladder and uterus).
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant female age more than 35 Years.
- History of more than 3 caesarean deliveries.
- Patient refusing conservative management.
- Uncontrolled maternal diabetes, hypertension, Preeclampsia and Decompensated Rheumatic Heart Disease.
- Placenta accrete( FiGO 2019 ) 8classification Grade I:
- Abnormally adherent placenta (placenta adherenta or accreta) Clinical criteria Macroscopically, the uterus shows no obvious distension over the placental bed (placental "bulge"), no placental tissue is seen invading through the surface of the uterus, and there is no or minimal neovascularity Histologic criteria Microscopic examination of the placental bed samples from hysterectomy specimen shows extended areas of absent decidua between villous tissue and myometrium with placental villi attached directly to the superficial myometrium The diagnosis cannot be made on just delivered placental tissue nor on random biopsies of the placental bed.
- \. Grade III(FIGO 2019)8: Abnormally invasive placenta (Percreta) Grade 3b: With urinary bladder invasion Clinical criteria At laparotomy Placental villi are seen to be invading into the bladder but no other organs. Clear surgical plan cannot be identified between the bladder a uterus. Histologic criteria Hysterectomy specimen showing villous tissue breaching the uterine serosa and invading the bladder wall tissue or urothelium.
- Grade 3c: With invasion of other pelvic tissue/organ Clinical criteria At laparotomy Placental villi are seen to be invading into the broad ligament, vaginal wall, pelvic sidewall or any other pelvic organ (with or without invasion of the bladder).
- Histologic criteria Hysterectomy specimen showing villous tissue breaching the uterine serosa and invading pelvic tissues/organs (with or without invasion of the bladder) For the purposes of this classification, "uterus" includes the uterine body and uterine cervix.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 050, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Sawada M, Matsuzaki S, Mimura K, Kumasawa K, Endo M, Kimura T. Successful conservative management of placenta percreta: Investigation by serial magnetic resonance imaging of the clinical course and a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1858-1863. doi: 10.1111/jog.13121. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
PMID: 27527121BACKGROUNDHecht JL, Baergen R, Ernst LM, Katzman PJ, Jacques SM, Jauniaux E, Khong TY, Metlay LA, Poder L, Qureshi F, Rabban JT 3rd, Roberts DJ, Shainker S, Heller DS. Classification and reporting guidelines for the pathology diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders: recommendations from an expert panel. Mod Pathol. 2020 Dec;33(12):2382-2396. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0569-1. Epub 2020 May 15.
PMID: 32415266BACKGROUNDJauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff-Roos J, Fox KA, Collins S; FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):20-24. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12761.
PMID: 31173360BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share