Effectiveness of Exercise Program in Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy
The Effect of Home Based Walking Exercise on Fatigue, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Quality, Circadian Rhythms and Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program in improving fatigue, negative emotions , sleep quality, circadian rhythms and quality of life in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy in Taiwan. Hypothesis:
- 1.The fatigue in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
- 2.The negative emotions in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
- 3.The sleep quality in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
- 4.The quality of life in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd,3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable gastric-cancer
Started Nov 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable gastric-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedDecember 21, 2021
December 1, 2021
4 years
September 21, 2020
December 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
baseline (one week after recruited)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
1st month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
2nd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
3rd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
6th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
12th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
24th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
36th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
baseline (one week after recruited)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
1st month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
2nd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
3rd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
6th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
12th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
24th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)
The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.
36th month after recruited
Secondary Outcomes (28)
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)
baseline (one week after recruited)
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)
1st month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)
2nd month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)
3rd month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)
6th month after recruited
- +23 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
exercise group
EXPERIMENTALA 12-week regimen of home-based walking exercises, comprising walking at a moderate intensity for 40 min, three times a Week.
usual-care group
NO INTERVENTIONThese participants follows the standard post-surgery follow-up consisting of counseling by dietitians, nurses and doctors.
Interventions
exercise education: A 12-week regimen of homebased walking exercises, include moderate intensity for 40 min, three times a week. We explained the participants how to perform the exercises, according to an instruction manual for the exercise regimen. Participants were instructed that the exercises would be effective only if they reached 40%-60% of the heart rate reserve, as determined by the Karvonen method, or 13-14 on the RPE. Exercise education: Weekly telephone or mobile application "LINE" consultations concerning exercise.we discussed whether participants' exercise fulfilled the prescribed intensity, duration, frequency and whether the participants experienced any adverse effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- After undergoing surgery and clinically diagnosed as gastric cancer.
- Adults over 20 years old.
- Hemoglobin (above 10 g/dL).
- Clear consciousness and could communicate in either Mandarin or Taiwanese, and were not cognitively impaired were included.
- No lower limb disability and able to walk on their own.
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected or confirmed bone metastasis.
- Poorly controlled cardiovascular disease such as heart failure, arrhythmia, angina, myocardial infarction, chest pain during activities or rest in the past three months, and valvular heart disease using anticoagulants.
- Poorly diabetes controlled, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C)\>9%, blood sugar higher than 250mg/dl or lower than 80mg/dl.
- Those with poor blood pressure control, systolic blood pressure greater than 160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure than 100mmHg when quiet, and heart rate is greater than 100bpm when quiet.
- Diagnosed as recurrent depression.
- Regular exercise above moderate intensity, such as 150 minutes per week in the past three months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei County, 112, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hui-Mei Chen, PhD
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2020
First Posted
October 19, 2020
Study Start
November 10, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2024
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
December 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months following article publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and receive the authors consent.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).