NCT04585971

Brief Summary

Cerebral blood flow measurement, which is applied to patients with cerebrovascular-related diseases, provides useful information about hemodynamic status. There was a method using Doppler ultrasound and phase contrast (PC) MRI, but it was not widely used in clinical practice due to limitations in reproducibility between examiners, complexity of procedure, and time-intensive protocol. We intend to measure cerebral blood flow through the signal-intensity gradient (SIG) technique using Time-of-Flight (TOF) of brain magnetic resonance imaging, which can compensate for the shortcomings of the existing research methods. In addition, by analyzing the correlation with the previous methods, Doppler ultrasound and PC MRI, we will evaluate the effectiveness of our new method.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 3, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 14, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 14, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 6, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 13, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Endothelial shear stresssignal-intensity gradientphase contrast MRITime-of-Flight MRICarotid Doppler sonography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cerebral blood flow correlation

    Cerebral blood flow correlation between 3 tests (SIG, PC MR, US)

    After completion of recruitment, average 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Subjects

Cerebral blood flow of a subject is measured using three methods in both common carotid and vertebral arteries. 1) Phase-contrast MR 2) Doppler sonography 3) Signal Intensity Gradient (SIG) To determine whether there is a correlation between the measured values, the correlation coefficient is calculated and analyzed.

Diagnostic Test: Signal intensity gradient

Interventions

Signal intensity gradient: In time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, The signal intensities at the iso-point (Φa; signal intensity at position A \[Xa\] along the arterial contour line) and at the inner point (Φb; signal intensity at position B \[Xb\]) were calculated by using a trilinear interpolation algorithm based on the positions and signal intensities in the eight neighboring voxels. The signal intensities of TOF-MRA were normalized to eliminate the offset and scale effects across the MRA datasets of participants. For each iso-point (position A), the SIG was calculated from the difference in signal intensities between points A and B as follows: Scalar SIG, SI/mm = (Φb - Φa) / │Xb - Xa│ (1) Vector SIG, SI/mm = (Φb - Φa) n / │Xb - Xa│ (2)

Also known as: Time-of-flight magnetic resonance imaging, Carotid Doppler sonography
Subjects

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients admitted to the neurology department of a tertiary center

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years of age or older who have been admitted to the neurology department due to a stroke, and those who have already performed brain magnetic resonance imaging
  • Among the patients (1) who underwent carotid artery Doppler ultrasound
  • Patients who fully understand the research objectives and procedures and wish to participate in clinical research voluntarily
  • If a patient is not fully understood due to a decrease in awareness or consciousness, the consent of the legal representative is required

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients whose extracranial artery occlusion or severe stenosis was confirmed in brain magnetic resonance images.
  • Those who judge that the subject is unsuitable for participation in clinical research due to other reasons.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jeonbuk National University Hospital

Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, 54907, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Han KS, Lee SH, Ryu HU, Park SH, Chung GH, Cho YI, Jeong SK. Direct Assessment of Wall Shear Stress by Signal Intensity Gradient from Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7087086. doi: 10.1155/2017/7087086. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

    PMID: 28900625BACKGROUND
  • Lee WJ, Jeong SK, Han KS, Lee SH, Ryu YJ, Sohn CH, Jung KH. Impact of Endothelial Shear Stress on the Bilateral Progression of Unilateral Moyamoya Disease. Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):775-783. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028117. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

    PMID: 31856692BACKGROUND
  • Jeong SK, Lee JY, Rosenson RS. Association between Ischemic Stroke and Vascular Shear Stress in the Carotid Artery. J Clin Neurol. 2014 Apr;10(2):133-9. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2014.10.2.133. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

    PMID: 24829599BACKGROUND
  • Lee CH, Lee SH, Kwak HS, Rosenson RS, Jeong SK, Jung KH. Arterial flow volume measurement using signal intensity gradient versus phase contrast. Sci Rep. 2025 Dec 29;15(1):44848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-28379-7.

  • Lee CH, Lee SH, Kwak HS, Kwak YG, Rosenson RS, Cho YI, Jeong SK. Validation of Signal Intensity Gradient from TOF-MRA for Wall Shear Stress by Phase-Contrast MR. J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Jun;37(3):1248-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-00991-5. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

Study Officials

  • Chan-Hyuk Lee, Prof.

    Jeonbuk National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Chan-Hyuk Lee, Prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2020

First Posted

October 14, 2020

Study Start

September 3, 2020

Primary Completion

January 31, 2021

Study Completion

January 31, 2021

Last Updated

October 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations