Validation of Ballistocardiographic Biosensors and Other Hemodynamic Measures for Healthy Subjects
Validation and Comparison of Ballistocardiographic Biosensors and Other Hemodynamic Measures for Healthy Subjects During Different Situations
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors reflecting the patients' current state is established. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. In addition, technologies using invasive blood pressure curves and Near Infrared Regional Spectrometry (NIRS) to measure hemodynamics have been used. Using these technologies to guide clinical decisions may be an major advance for patients with acute and chronic diseases. The investigators will explore how these technologies compares to well established technologies measuring vital signs of healthy subjects. The investigators will use live continuous and non-continuous biosensor data to monitor the development of vital parameters during different scenarios. The study will document how CPD measured by biosensors, cerebral oximetry measured by NIRS, and invasive blood pressure curves measured by FloTrac™ are compared to established technologies of vital organ functionality. Data will be measured continuously and documented simultanuously with technologies such as Doppler Echocardiography, transthoracic impedance (TTI), Electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive blood pressure \[cardiac output/index (CO/CI), stroke volume/stroke volume index (SV/SVI), stroke volume variation/pulse pressure variation (SVV/PPV), systemic vascular resistance/ systemic vascular resistance index (SVR/SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP)\], pulse oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2). Of special interest is to document how relative heart stroke volume reflects blood flow documented by the parallel technology measures. All these measures are the key part in the study to document user friendliness, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and correlations. The main research question is whether adding BCG biosensor measures, cerebral oximetry and invasive blood pressure to monitor vital signs will add meaningful information to the care of patients in a situation where we are able to control all the factors that may impact these measures. The aim of the study is to document (correlation, sensitivity and specificity) how BCG biosensors perform compared to each other and to well established technologies used for monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate and respiration rate in steady state and during ambulance transport. In addition, the investigators will in a controlled manner measure how established maneuvers like Trendelenburg, hypo-/hyperventilation, and bolus of fluid influences our measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedOctober 14, 2020
October 1, 2020
2 days
October 1, 2020
October 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correlation between different measures of hemodynamics
Calculated based on a number of hemodynamic measures listed in the protocol
September to December
Interventions
Measures of blood flow and preassures
Eligibility Criteria
Paramedic students recruited free of will.
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects who have signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Sick subjects at test day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oslo University Hospitallead
- Norwegian Telemedicinecollaborator
- Kopera Norwaycollaborator
- Edwards Lifesciencescollaborator
- Stryker Medicalcollaborator
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)collaborator
- University of Stavangercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, Please Select, 0367, Norway
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lars Wik, MD, PhD
Oslo University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
September 28, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
October 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- From September 2020 to September 2025
- Access Criteria
- A secure sharing plattform will be used.
Based on informed consent this will be done with those parties listed.