Prediction of Cardiac Instability in Intensive Care
PRECAIN
1 other identifier
observational
3,069
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A large number of different organ functions are recorded in real time for patients who are monitored in an intensive care unit. On the one hand, the measured values collected in this way are used for continuous monitoring of vital parameters, but they are also evaluated several times a day in order to be able to make decisions regarding further diagnostics and therapy. In the first case, threshold values can be defined, and if these are exceeded or fallen short of, the treatment team is automatically alerted. If these limits are set too liberally, then the alert will only indicate an acute risk to the patient, where extensive pathophysiological changes have already occurred. If the limits are chosen too restrictively, then there are frequent false alarms, since the limits are exceeded in most cases due to natural fluctuation, without this having any pathological value. The consequence is a so-called "alarm fatigue", which in the worst case leads to ignoring correct alarms and thus endangers the patients. By design, all of these readings only show the status quo of a patient. It is the task of the treatment team to predict from the course of these readings whether a threatening situation is developing for the patient. For daily clinical practice, it would be better if dangerous changes in vital signs could be predicted. In this case, it would be possible to intervene therapeutically not only when a dangerous situation has arisen, but to try to avert this situation through adequate measures by changing the therapy strategy. In such a case, the treatment team would no longer be confronted with emergency alarms, but could counteract an impending deterioration with a long lead time. The first approaches for detecting a drop in blood pressure, for example, which are based on simple models, are already in clinical use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2022
CompletedAugust 17, 2022
August 1, 2022
2 months
July 12, 2022
August 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUROC for Classification of Instability
AUROC for Classification of Instability
2018-03-01 to 2020-10-31
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Confusion Matrix
2018-03-01 to 2020-10-31
Descriptive Statistics This outcome measure will compare the individual feature (e. g. height in cm) in one group vs. the other. Significant difference will be described by p-value.
2018-03-01 to 2020-10-31
Study Arms (2)
Instability
No Instability
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
As described in the inclusion criteria.
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients that have been treated at the intensive care units of the Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria between 2018-03-01 and 2020-10-31.
You may not qualify if:
- None.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kepler University Hospital
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021, Austria
Related Publications (1)
Tschoellitsch T, Kaltenleithner S, Maletzky A, Moser P, Seidl P, Bock C, Thumfart S, Giretzlehner M, Hochreiter S, Meier J. Mean arterial pressure is all you need in a machine learning model for mean arterial pressure prediction. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Dec 1;42(12):1112-1122. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002238. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
PMID: 40726206DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Tschoellitsch, MD
Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2022
First Posted
July 22, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 31, 2022
Study Completion
July 31, 2022
Last Updated
August 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share