NCT04582461

Brief Summary

Preoperative assessment of visceral fat volume(VFV),total fat volume(TFV),pancreas/spleen density ratio and pancreatic duct diameter by multislice computed tomography abdomen to predict the risk of pancreatic fistula after Whipple's operation.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • preoperative prediction of occurence of pancreatic fistula after Whipple's operation to enhance surveillance and further management as early as possible.

    Preoperative assessment mainly abdominal fat distribution (expressed in centimeter cubic) by multislice computed tomography abdomen to predict the risk of pancreatic fistula after Whipple's operation.

    Baseline

Interventions

All patients will undergo a preoperative multiphasic multidetector CT scan before surgery.The unenhanced scan will be used to generate a CT reconstruction of the upper abdomen (from the diaphragm to the kidneys) with a 5mm thickness. Two different radiologists (D.F. and D.I.), blinded to patient information, measured total fat volume (TFV), visceral fat volume (VFV), and analyzed pixels with densities in the - 190 hounsfield units (HU) to - 20 HU range. the ratio between the density of the pancreas over the density of the spleen will be calculated and the maximum diameter of the pancreatic duct will be measured using the arterial phase in order to better identify the entire length of the duct.

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Selection of average 100 patients expected to visit Assiut university hospitals for multislice computed tomography Abdomen before Whipple's operation according to the recorded flow on the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in the last year.

You may qualify if:

  • all patients referred to the radiology department for multislice computed tomography Abdomen examination for preoperative evaluation before Whipple's operation over the estimated period of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with contraindications to multislice computed tomography as a history of reactions to contrast agents, radioactive iodine treatment for thyroid disease, metformin use, and chronic or acutely worsening renal disease.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (15)

  • Ilic M, Ilic I. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 28;22(44):9694-9705. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9694.

    PMID: 27956793BACKGROUND
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

    PMID: 30207593BACKGROUND
  • Hidalgo M, Cascinu S, Kleeff J, Labianca R, Lohr JM, Neoptolemos J, Real FX, Van Laethem JL, Heinemann V. Addressing the challenges of pancreatic cancer: future directions for improving outcomes. Pancreatology. 2015 Jan-Feb;15(1):8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

    PMID: 25547205BACKGROUND
  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PMID: 26742998BACKGROUND
  • Mohammed S, Van Buren G 2nd, Fisher WE. Pancreatic cancer: advances in treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9354-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9354.

    PMID: 25071330BACKGROUND
  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

    PMID: 16003309BACKGROUND
  • Enestvedt CK, Diggs BS, Cassera MA, Hammill C, Hansen PD, Wolf RF. Complications nearly double the cost of care after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.019. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

    PMID: 22464011BACKGROUND
  • Huttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 16;2(2):CD006053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub6.

    PMID: 26905229BACKGROUND
  • Koti RS, Gurusamy KS, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery: a Cochrane review. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Apr;12(3):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00157.x.

    PMID: 20590882BACKGROUND
  • Lermite E, Pessaux P, Brehant O, Teyssedou C, Pelletier I, Etienne S, Arnaud JP. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):588-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018. Epub 2007 Mar 2.

    PMID: 17382217BACKGROUND
  • Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044.

    PMID: 15585382BACKGROUND
  • Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

    PMID: 23122535BACKGROUND
  • Sandini M, Bernasconi DP, Ippolito D, Nespoli L, Baini M, Barbaro S, Fior D, Gianotti L. Preoperative Computed Tomography to Predict and Stratify the Risk of Severe Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(31):e1152. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001152.

    PMID: 26252274BACKGROUND
  • Kirihara Y, Takahashi N, Hashimoto Y, Sclabas GM, Khan S, Moriya T, Sakagami J, Huebner M, Sarr MG, Farnell MB. Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition. Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):512-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827827d0.

    PMID: 23241871BACKGROUND
  • McAuliffe JC, Parks K, Kumar P, McNeal SF, Morgan DE, Christein JD. Computed tomography attenuation and patient characteristics as predictors of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Sep;15(9):709-15. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12037. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

    PMID: 23458275BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Fistula

Interventions

Multidetector Computed Tomography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography, Spiral ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2020

First Posted

October 9, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

January 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

October 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10