NCT03800940

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, investigator initiated, prospective, superiority, parallel-group, randomized, double-blinded trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of trans-drain occlusion followed by gradual withdrawal of drain versus gradual withdrawal of drain alone for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) that persists for longer than 21 days.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 11, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2019

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 27, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 27, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 28, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

January 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Days to fistula closure

    Days from the randomly allocated treatment to fistula closure

    The date of fistula closure is the date on which the drain is removed after an output of ≦ 10 mL during 48 hours, without recurrence of fistula within the next 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • 30-day fistula closure rate

    From enrollment to 4 months after fistula occurrence

  • Rate of persistent or recurrent POPF after initial drain removal

    From drain removal to 3 months after drain removal or recurrence of fistula, whichever occurs first

  • Length of hospital stay after the assigned treatment

    From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

  • Hospital costs after the assigned treatment

    From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

  • Rate of fistula-related complications

    From occurrence of fistula to 3 months after drain removal

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    From treatment to discharge from the index admission, an average of 2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion

EXPERIMENTAL

Fistulography is performed to assess the condition of the fistula, and trans-drain occlusion is performed by injecting glue (NBCA and Lipiodol) through the drain to occlude the tract.

Procedure: Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion

Fistulography

SHAM COMPARATOR

Fistulography is performed to assess the condition of the fistula, without trains-drain occlusion.

Procedure: Fistulography

Interventions

1. Fistulography: an 18G needle is inserted into the tube and diluted contrast medium is slowly injected into the tube. 2. Trans-drain occlusion: a 0.035-inch guidewire is inserted via the puncture needle. The drain tube is removed, cut at 4 cm proximal to the skin fixation site, and preserved for reinsertion. After inserting a 40cm 5Fr KMP catheter over the guidewire, the guidewire is removed. Afte rinsing the KMP catheter with 3ml 5% glucose water, withdraw the catheter and simultaneously inject glue (33%, 1:2, 0.5ml of NBCA + 1ml Lipiodol) into the catheter until the proximal 5cm of the catheter remains inside the tract. The guidewire is re-inserted through the catheter, and then the original drain tube is re-inserted over the guidewire. The guidewire is removed and the drain is fixed.

Fistulography and trans-drain occlusion
FistulographyPROCEDURE

Fistulography: an 18G needle is inserted into the tube and diluted contrast medium is slowly injected into the tube.

Fistulography

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who undergo pancreatectomy (including pancreatoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation, distal pancreatectomy, and central pancreatectomy) and develop POPF that persists for 3 weeks after its occurrence.
  • With POPF that persists for 3 weeks after occurrence

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 20 years of age
  • Current or history of severe heart, lung, kidney, or liver failure
  • Karnofsky Performance Score \<60
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Have received somatostatin or its analogue in the index admission
  • Decline to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, 100, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P. Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2002 Oct;89(10):1245-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02202.x.

    PMID: 12296891BACKGROUND
  • Balcom JH 4th, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):391-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391.

    PMID: 11296108BACKGROUND
  • Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):248-57; discussion 257-60. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004.

    PMID: 9339931BACKGROUND
  • Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

    PMID: 28040257BACKGROUND
  • Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

    PMID: 16003309BACKGROUND
  • Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP, Marudanayagam R, Hodson J, Isaac J, Muiesan P, Navarro A, Patel K, Jah A, Napetti S, Adair A, Lazaridis S, Prachalias A, Shingler G, Al-Sarireh B, Storey R, Smith AM, Shah N, Fusai G, Ahmed J, Abu Hilal M, Mirza DF. Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1191-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997.

    PMID: 25371115BACKGROUND
  • El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1405-18. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5.

    PMID: 23494109BACKGROUND
  • Veillette G, Dominguez I, Ferrone C, Thayer SP, McGrath D, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):476-81. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476.

    PMID: 18490557BACKGROUND
  • McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston M, Callery MP, Christein JD, Dixon E, Drebin JA, Castillo CF, Fisher WE, Fong ZV, House MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Miller BC, Salem RR, Soares K, Valero V, Wolfgang CL, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk-adjusted Outcomes of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Model for Performance Evaluation. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):344-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001537.

    PMID: 26727086BACKGROUND
  • Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Buchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7.

    PMID: 21529927BACKGROUND
  • Tjaden C, Hinz U, Hassenpflug M, Fritz F, Fritz S, Grenacher L, Buchler MW, Hackert T. Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

    PMID: 26776849BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Fistula

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yu-Wen Tien, MD, PhD

    National Taiwan University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive trans-drain occlusion followed by gradual drain withdrawal or gradual drain withdrawal.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2019

First Posted

January 11, 2019

Study Start

January 11, 2019

Primary Completion

November 27, 2022

Study Completion

March 27, 2023

Last Updated

March 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations