NCT04574622

Brief Summary

Spasticity, defined as a velocity dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes, is one of the most prominent motor problems that occur in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). This causes difficulty in achieving balance, mobility, and an upright stance. CP is a group of permanent disorders that affect the development of movement and posture caused by a non-progressive damage to the brain. Because CP occurs in 2-3 of 1000 individuals, it is one of the most common causes of severe physical disability in children. Mismanagement of spasticity can lead to contracture which is extremely difficult to treat and may result in severe functional disabilities. The current management of spasticity in CP includes physical therapy (i.e. passive stretching), oral medication, botulinum toxin injection, and surgery. Botulinum toxin injection has been proven to effectively reduce spasticity yet many patients are unable to get access to this treatment due to its high cost. Moreover, Botulinum toxin injection is currently not covered by the public health insurance of Indonesia. Therefore, other modalities which are more affordable and are non-invasive therapies should be considered as a treatment option for spasticity. Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT) has been utilized in the medical practice for the treatment of several musculoskeletal disorders such as chronic tendinopathies and spasticity. It is hypothesized that ESWT has two main effects which include a direct effect from mechanical forces at the treatment point and an indirect effect from cavitation. Even though rESWT has less penetration capacity over the focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (fESWT), rESWT is still believed to be more superior to fESWT because it requires less precise focusing, is less painful, and costs less. These also make rESWT the more appropriate choice for children with CP. Many studies have proven the efficacy of ESWT in reducing spasticity in spastic CP patients with significantly long lasting effects. Despite promising results, there still has yet to be a recommended guideline for the treatment of spasticity in children using rESWT. One of the critical parameters needed to be determined is the frequency of treatment. Therefore, the objective of this study is to understand whether the reduction in gastrocnemius stiffness in children with spastic CP is influenced by the frequency of ESWT sessions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 17, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 17, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2020

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 5, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 28, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

SpasticityCerebral PalsyChildrenESWTFrequency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Baseline Spasticity of Gastrocnemius

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    pre-ESWT

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after first ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    After first ESWT session (Week 1)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after second ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    After second ESWT session (Week 2)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after third ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    After third ESWT session (Week 3)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after fourth ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    After fourth ESWT session (Week 4)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius after fifth ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    After fifth ESWT session (Week 5)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius four weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    Four weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 9)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius eight weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    Eight weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 13)

  • Spasticity of Gastrocnemius twelve weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session

    Evaluated as the degree of resistance to passive movement using ASAS (0: no spasticity to 4: severe spasticity)

    Twelve weeks after fifth (last) ESWT session (Week 17)

Study Arms (2)

Five true ESWT sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

A total of five sessions (1x/week) were conducted. A total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

Device: radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Three true ESWT sessions and two sham ESWT sessions

EXPERIMENTAL

A total of three true ESWT (week 1, 3 and 5) and two sham ESWTs in (week 2 and 4) were conducted. For true ESWT sessions, a total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars. For sham ESWT sessions, a total of 1,500 pulses were delivered to each gastrocnemius muscle with a 1 cm gap between between the probe and subject's skin. The energy flux density was constant at 0.1 mJ/mm2 and the repetition frequency was at 4 Hz, with a pressure of 1.5 bars.

Device: radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Interventions

rESWT was given on gastrocnemius muscles with the subject lying on prone position. No anesthesia was required.

Five true ESWT sessionsThree true ESWT sessions and two sham ESWT sessions

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with spastic CP aged 5 to 18 years old
  • at least one gastrocnemius with an Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) of 2 or more
  • ability of legal respondent to give written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • months or less since the last botulinum injection on hamstring
  • surgical operation on lower limb within the last 12 months
  • severe contracture on gastrocnemius

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Kedokteran

Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Muscle SpasticityCerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBrain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Rizky K Wardhani, M.D., Physiatrist

    Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Kedokteran

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants (including parents of patients), physiatrists who conducted ESWT and physiatrists who examined the patients' ASAS score are all blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Physiatrist, Consultant in PM&R Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2020

First Posted

October 5, 2020

Study Start

January 17, 2020

Primary Completion

June 17, 2020

Study Completion

June 17, 2020

Last Updated

October 5, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Locations