NCT04569201

Brief Summary

  • Assess the efficacy of the endoscope as a single tool or as an adjuvant tool to the microscope in intraventricular procedures.
  • Evaluate the limitations of the endoscope in these procedures.
  • Review the outcome of endoscopic and/or endoscopic assisted microsurgical intraventricular procedures.
  • Achieve a verdict in the long-standing controversy about the most effective, least invasive, and optimal way to resect intraventricular lesions, can the endoscope rival the surgical microscope?

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 29, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Early Clinical outcome using Glasgow Outcome Scale

    Assessment of the post operative mortality and morbidity using: Glasgow Outcome Scale: 1. Death:Self-explanatory 2. Persistent vegetative state: Coma or severe deficit rendering the patient totally dependent 3. Severe disability: Significant neurological deficit interfering with daily activities or prevents return to employment 4. Moderate disability:Minor neurological deficit not interfering with daily functioning or work 5. Good recovery:Returned to the original functional level with no deficit

    Early outcome: 24 hours post-operatively.

  • Early Clinical outcome using Modified Rankin Scale

    The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is used to measure the degree of disability in patients, as follows: * 0: No symptoms at all * 1: No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities * 2: Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance * 3: Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance * 4: Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance * 5: Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention * 6: Dead

    Within 6 weeks after surgery.

  • Late outcome assessment

    Within six months, assessment of the performance of the patient with modified rankin scale.

    within 6 months after surgery

Interventions

EndoscopePROCEDURE

The use of the neuro endoscope in excision of intraventricular lesions either alone or in assistance of the surgical microscope

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

PAtients with intraventricular lesions, presented to The Neurosurgery Department, At Assiut University Hospital in Assiut, Egypt

You may qualify if:

  • Intraventricular arachnoid cysts
  • Intraventricular colloid cysts
  • Intraventricular tumors.

You may not qualify if:

  • Intraventricular lesions extending outside the ventricle (exception to arachnoid cysts)
  • Patients who are unfit for any neurosurgical interventions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (10)

  • Nduom EK, Sribnick EA, Ormond DR, Hadjipanayis CG. Neuroendoscopic Resection of Intraventricular Tumors and Cysts through a Working Channel with a Variable Aspiration Tissue Resector: A Feasibility and Safety Study. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:471805. doi: 10.1155/2013/471805. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

    PMID: 23844287BACKGROUND
  • Yasargil MG, Abdulrauf SI. Surgery of intraventricular tumors. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1029-40; discussion 1040-1. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333768.12951.9a.

    PMID: 18695523BACKGROUND
  • Barber SM, Rangel-Castilla L, Baskin D. Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:898753. doi: 10.1155/2013/898753. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

    PMID: 24191196BACKGROUND
  • Singh I, Rohilla S, Kumar P, Krishana G. Combined microsurgical and endoscopic technique for removal of extensive intracranial epidermoids. Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Feb 14;9:36. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_392_17. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29527394BACKGROUND
  • Cappabianca P, Cinalli G, Gangemi M, Brunori A, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E, Decq P, Delitala A, Di Rocco F, Frazee J, Godano U, Grotenhuis A, Longatti P, Mascari C, Nishihara T, Oi S, Rekate H, Schroeder HW, Souweidane MM, Spennato P, Tamburrini G, Teo C, Warf B, Zymberg ST. Application of neuroendoscopy to intraventricular lesions. Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:575-97; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000316262.74843.dd.

    PMID: 18596446BACKGROUND
  • Souweidane MM, Luther N. Endoscopic resection of solid intraventricular brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2):271-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.2.271.

    PMID: 17219833BACKGROUND
  • Harris AE, Hadjipanayis CG, Lunsford LD, Lunsford AK, Kassam AB. Microsurgical removal of intraventricular lesions using endoscopic visualization and stereotactic guidance. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jan;56(1 Suppl):125-32; discussion 125-32. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000146227.75138.08.

    PMID: 15799800BACKGROUND
  • Brunori A, de Falco R, Delitala A, Schaller K, Schonauer C. Tailoring Endoscopic Approach to Colloid Cysts of the Third Ventricle: A Multicenter Experience. World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:e457-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.051. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

    PMID: 29959067BACKGROUND
  • Yadav YR, Parihar V, Sinha M, Jain N. Endoscopic treatment of the suprasellar arachnoid cyst. Neurol India. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):280-3. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.63772.

    PMID: 20508350BACKGROUND
  • Romano A, Chibbaro S, Marsella M, Oretti G, Spiriev T, Iaccarino C, Servadei F. Combined endoscopic transsphenoidal-transventricular approach for resection of a giant pituitary macroadenoma. World Neurosurg. 2010 Jul;74(1):161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.024.

    PMID: 21300008BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Endoscopes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic EquipmentEquipment and SuppliesSurgical Equipment

Central Study Contacts

Nour Eldin H. M. K. Imam, Masters Degree in Neurosurgery

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Lecturer (Principal Investigator)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2020

First Posted

September 29, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 29, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09