Impact of Pre-procedure Cognitive Status on Outcome at 3 Months After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
TAVI-Geriatrie
1 other identifier
observational
109
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study plans to investigate the relationship between cognitive status pre-procedure, and clinical outcomes at 3 months in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedFebruary 24, 2022
February 1, 2022
2 years
June 20, 2019
February 23, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
All-cause death
Safety outcome at 3 months as assessed by the VARC2 criteria: all-cause death
through 30 days after the TAVI procedure
Stroke
Safety outcome at 30 days as assessed by the VARC2 criteria: stroke
through 30 days after the TAVI procedure
life-threatening bleed
Safety outcome at 30 days as assessed by the VARC2 criteria: life-threatening bleed
through 30 days after the TAVI procedure
Combined VARC2 safety outcome
Safety criteria (within 30 days of the procedure) include all-cause death; stroke; life-threatening bleed; renal insufficiency; coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention; major vascular complication; valve dysfunction. Clinical Efficacy criteria (30 days to 3 months after the procedure) include: all-cause death; stroke; re-admission for valve-rela
through 30 days after the TAVI procedure
Combined VARC2 efficacy outcome
Clinical Efficacy criteria (30 days to 3 months after the procedure) include: all-cause death; stroke; re-admission for valve-related symptoms or worsening heart failure; NYHA Class III or IV; valve-related dysfunction.
through 30 days after the TAVI procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time required for MoCA
At the time of MoCA completion
Biological parameters pre-procedure
pre-procedure
Relationship between MoCA score and each component of the VARC2
At 3 months after TAVI procedure
Study Arms (1)
Study cohort
Adult (\>18 years) patients with aortic stenosis in whom TAVI is planned and who perform their pre-TAVI work-up in our centre will be invited to undergo cognitive assessment using the MoCA at the time of their hospitalization for pre-TAVI work-up. The MoCA will be administered by trained professionals with MoCA certification. Clinical outcomes, as assessed by the VARC2 criteria, will be collected for all patients at 3 months after the TAVI procedure.
Interventions
cognitive assessment using the validated MoCA test administered via an application on an iPad
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with aortic stenosis and a confirmed indication for TAVI, scheduled to undergo TAVI and who perform their pre-TAVI work-up in our centre will be invited to participate.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or over
- Scheduled to undergo TAVI
- Provide informed consent
- Able to understand French
You may not qualify if:
- subjects under legal guardianship or other legal protection
- subjects with documented severe dementia
- subjects with anticipated poor compliance
- subjects unable to understand French sufficiently well to perform the MoCA test
- pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25000, France
Biospecimen
Blood samples will be taken and centrifuged, and plasma will be aliquoted and frozen at -80°Celsius for analysis of growth differentiation factor (GDF) 15.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francois Schiele, MD, PhD
CHRU Besancon
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2019
First Posted
September 25, 2020
Study Start
October 9, 2019
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
February 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share