Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
OTHER_GRANT · Wellcome Trust
interventional
1,244
1 country
1
Study Start
September 29, 2020
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Purpose: To evaluate reactions to and opinions of a messaging campaign. Participants: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels and will be US-based adults (18 years old and older) who consumed red meat in the past 30 days. Procedures (methods): After completing a screening question about meat consumption, participants will review a consent form. If they select to participate in the study, participants will be randomly assigned to view control messages, red meat-related environment messages, or red meat-related health messages. They will be asked a series of questions about these messages. Participants will also be asked about grocery shopping preferences and standard demographics questions.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
September 14, 2020
Actual (reported)September 24, 2020
Actual (reported)September 29, 2020
Actual (reported)October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Perceived Message Effectiveness (PME)
Perceived effectiveness of the messages will be measured during the message using 4 items adapted from Baig et al. (2018): concern, unpleasantness, and discouragement. The averaged responses on the 4 items will be used to create a PME score. All 4 items are measured using a a 1 to 5 likert scale, with higher scores representing a higher amount of the construct. Questions: How much do these messages... * make you concerned about the health effects of eating red meat? * make you concerned about the environmental effects of eating red meat? * discourage you from wanting to eat red meat? * make eating red meat seem unpleasant to you? 1. Not at all, 2=Very little, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=A great deal).
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Attention
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Negative affect
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Cognitive elaboration
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Social interactions
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Intention to reduce meat consumption
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Four environmental messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Four health messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Four neutral messages about checking one's credit score.
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the environmental harms of meat production from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the health harms of meat consumption from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Carolina Population Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Hannah Rayala
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1,244 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
September 24, 2020
Study Start
September 29, 2020
Actual (reported)Helping People to Exercise Regularly
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about checking their credit score.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: