Evaluating a Messaging Campaign in the United States
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,244
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: To evaluate reactions to and opinions of a messaging campaign. Participants: Participants will be recruited through Prime Panels and will be US-based adults (18 years old and older) who consumed red meat in the past 30 days. Procedures (methods): After completing a screening question about meat consumption, participants will review a consent form. If they select to participate in the study, participants will be randomly assigned to view control messages, red meat-related environment messages, or red meat-related health messages. They will be asked a series of questions about these messages. Participants will also be asked about grocery shopping preferences and standard demographics questions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 5, 2020
September 1, 2020
2 days
September 14, 2020
October 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived Message Effectiveness (PME)
Perceived effectiveness of the messages will be measured during the message using 4 items adapted from Baig et al. (2018): concern, unpleasantness, and discouragement. The averaged responses on the 4 items will be used to create a PME score. All 4 items are measured using a a 1 to 5 likert scale, with higher scores representing a higher amount of the construct. Questions: How much do these messages... * make you concerned about the health effects of eating red meat? * make you concerned about the environmental effects of eating red meat? * discourage you from wanting to eat red meat? * make eating red meat seem unpleasant to you? 1. Not at all, 2=Very little, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=A great deal).
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Attention
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Negative affect
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Cognitive elaboration
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Social interactions
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Intention to reduce meat consumption
~10 minute computer survey immediately after seeing messages
Study Arms (3)
Environment-focused Meatless Monday messages
EXPERIMENTALFour environmental messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Health-focused Meatless Monday messages
EXPERIMENTALFour health messages from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Neutral Message
OTHERFour neutral messages about checking one's credit score.
Interventions
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the environmental harms of meat production from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about the health harms of meat consumption from the Meatless Monday campaign.
Participants will be randomized to view a set of four messages about checking their credit score.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be 18 years or older
- Be able to read and speak English
- Be able to take a computer survey in English
- Currently reside in the United States
- Consumed red meat in the past 30 days
You may not qualify if:
- Non red-meat eater
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- Wellcome Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Carolina Population Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hannah Rayala
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- STUDY CHAIR
Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
September 24, 2020
Study Start
September 29, 2020
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09