NCT04561310

Brief Summary

To determine the technique that will have better effects in realigning the muscle kinematics and to normalize the muscle activity along with reducing muscle stiffness with mobilizations techniques

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

September 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

ShoulderPainFibrosisDisability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Shoulder pain and disability Index (SPADI)

    The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. Each of the 13 items is to be rated with a number from 0 to 10: For the pain score (first 5 items): 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable; For the disability score (last 8 items): 0 means no impairment and 10 means the patient requires help to perform that action

    6th week

  • The oxford scale

    The Oxford Scale is a 0-5 scale which is then recorded as 0/5 or 2/5, sometimes with a + or - sign to indicate more or less power but not sufficient to reduce or increase the number.

    6th week

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The common format is a horizontal bar or line. Similar to the VAS, the NPRS is anchored by terms describing pain severity extremes.

    6th week

  • ROM Shoulder Flexion

    Goniometer is used to measure the range of the motion of the shoulder flexion

    6th week

  • ROM Shoulder Extension

    Goniometer is used to measure the range of the motion of the shoulder extension

    6th week

  • ROM Shoulder Abduction

    Goniometer is used to measure the range of the motion of the shoulder Abduction

    6th week

  • ROM Shoulder External Rotation

    Goniometer is used to measure the range of the motion of the shoulder External Rotation

    6th week

  • ROM Shoulder Internal Rotation

    Goniometer is used to measure the range of the motion of the shoulder Internal Rotation

    6th week

Study Arms (2)

Post facilitation stretch

EXPERIMENTAL

Post facilitation stretch with Maitland mobilization

Other: Post facilitation stretch

Active release technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active release technique with Maitland mobilization

Other: Active release technique

Interventions

Post facilitation stretch with maitland mobilization Grade I \& II Maitland mobilization of shoulder joint in 1st and 2nd week progressing to Grade III oscillatory mobilization of shoulder joint in 3rd week. It will further progress to Grade IV Maitland oscillatory mobilizations in the 4th or 5th week. Treatment will be provided 3 session/week for 6 weeks with 40 minutes/session

Post facilitation stretch

Active release technique with maitland mobilization Grade I \& II Maitland mobilization of shoulder joint in 1st and 2nd week progressing to Grade III oscillatory mobilization of shoulder joint in 3rd week. It will further progress to Grade IV Maitland oscillatory mobilizations in the 4th or 5th week. Treatment will be provided 3 session/week for 6 weeks with 40 minutes/session

Active release technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Controlled diabetic patients (random 200-250mg/dl /fasting 120-160mg/dl).
  • Grade 2 \& 3 of adhesive capsulitis,
  • Pain (NPRS) ranging between 3-10
  • Reduced normal shoulder ROM's i.e
  • Flexion less than 160 degrees.
  • Extension less than 50 degrees.
  • Abduction less than 170 degrees.
  • External rotation less than 80 degrees.
  • Internal rotation less than 70 degrees

You may not qualify if:

  • Trauma history of shoulder/surgery.
  • Frozen shoulder accompanied with neurological involvement.
  • People with any injury or disability of elbow or hand

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Asif Hospital Wah Cantt

Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Rose PG. Effective Reduction of Adhesive Capsulitis Pain with a Suprascapular Nerve Block Given in a Primary Care Clinic. InConference Highlights (p. 30).

    BACKGROUND
  • Ewald A. Adhesive capsulitis: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2011 Feb 15;83(4):417-22.

    PMID: 21322517BACKGROUND
  • Tighe CB, Oakley WS Jr. The prevalence of a diabetic condition and adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. South Med J. 2008 Jun;101(6):591-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181705d39.

    PMID: 18475240BACKGROUND
  • Garcilazo C, Cavallasca JA, Musuruana JL. Shoulder manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2010 Sep;6(5):334-40. doi: 10.2174/157339910793360824.

    PMID: 20701586BACKGROUND
  • Hsu CL, Sheu WH. Diabetes and shoulder disorders. J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Sep;7(5):649-51. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12491. Epub 2016 Mar 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27182002BACKGROUND
  • Donatelli R, Ruivo RM, Thurner M, Ibrahim MI. New concepts in restoring shoulder elevation in a stiff and painful shoulder patient. Phys Ther Sport. 2014 Feb;15(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

    PMID: 24315683BACKGROUND
  • Anton HA. Frozen shoulder. Can Fam Physician. 1993 Aug;39:1773-8.

    PMID: 8374364BACKGROUND
  • Gutierrez Espinoza HJ, Pavez F, Guajardo C, Acosta M. Glenohumeral posterior mobilization versus conventional physiotherapy for primary adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial. Medwave. 2015 Sep 22;15(8):e6267. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2015.08.6267. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 26485477BACKGROUND
  • Ravichandran H, Balamurugan J. Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretch and muscle energy technique in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Saudi Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015 May 1;15(2):170.

    BACKGROUND
  • Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, le Cessie S, Vliet Vlieland TP. Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;86(3):355-68.

    PMID: 16506872BACKGROUND
  • Gupta S, Jaiswal P, Chhabra D. A comparative study between postisometric relaxation and isometric exercises in non-specific neck pain. Journal of exercise science and physiotherapy. 2008;4(2):88.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kim JH, Lee HS, Park SW. Effects of the active release technique on pain and range of motion of patients with chronic neck pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Aug;27(8):2461-4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2461. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

    PMID: 26357426BACKGROUND
  • Shih YF, Liao PW, Lee CS. The immediate effect of muscle release intervention on muscle activity and shoulder kinematics in patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional, exploratory study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 28;18(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1867-8.

    PMID: 29183307BACKGROUND
  • Noten S, Meeus M, Stassijns G, Van Glabbeek F, Verborgt O, Struyf F. Efficacy of Different Types of Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Primary Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 May;97(5):815-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

    PMID: 26284892BACKGROUND
  • Hung CJ, Hsieh CL, Yang PL, Lin JJ. Relationships between posterior shoulder muscle stiffness and rotation in patients with stiff shoulder. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Mar;42(3):216-20. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0504.

    PMID: 20411215BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BursitisPainFibrosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Nazish Rafique, MSPT

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2020

First Posted

September 23, 2020

Study Start

June 15, 2020

Primary Completion

January 1, 2021

Study Completion

January 30, 2021

Last Updated

March 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations