Toxins Removal and Inflammatory State modulAtion During Online Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers
TRIAD2
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary goal of the study is to evaluate in patients on three times a week on-line HDF the efficacy, in terms of toxin removal and modulation of the inflammatory state, of two different dialyzers: Helixone versus Asimmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedMarch 17, 2021
March 1, 2021
1.3 years
September 5, 2020
March 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of uremic toxins
Beta 2 microglobulin (B2M), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, myoglobin, light chains, retinol binding protein, homocysteine, p-cresol, indoxyl sulfate, BPA, alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), FGF23 (fibroblast growth factor 23)
24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Measurement of endothelial cells metabolism
24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)
Patients survival
24 months
Body impedance analysis
24 months.
AGEs measurements
24 months
Measurement of inflammatory cytokines
24 months. Blood samples will be drawn at Time 0 (on starting the study when the patients starts HDF treatment), after 1 month, after 3 months, after 6 months, after 12 months, and after 24 months (study end)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hemodiafiltration with ATA filter
EXPERIMENTALpatients with clinical history of hypersensitivity to polisulfone/poliethersulfone dialysis filters or hypersensitivity to drugs or generic allergens.
Hemodiafiltration with Helixone filter
ACTIVE COMPARATORno history of hypersensitivity to polisulfone/poliethersulfone dialysis filters is assessed; no history of hypersensitivity to drugs or generic allergens is assessed.
Interventions
1. the comparison of the effects of the two membranes on the serum levels of albumin, B2M, CRP, myoglobin, light chains, retinol binding protein, homocysteine, p-cresol, indoxyl sulfate, BPA, alpha-1-microglobulin (A1M), FGF23 (fibroblast growth factor 23), and inflammatory cytokines; 2. the evaluation of the changes induced by the two filters on lymphocyte subsets, monocyte activation and senescence, and apoptosis rate; 3. the definition of the impact of the two membranes on the accumulation of AGEs as an index of metabolic and oxidative stress, determined by a non-invasive method based on the measurement of skin autofluorescence through a dedicated device (AGE Reader, DiagnOptics Technologies BV, Groningen, Netherlands).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with chronic renal failure under periodic standard bicarbonate hemodialysis;
- Three times a week dialysis session;
- Residual diuresis \<200 mL/day;
- Age \>18 years;
- Vascular access for hemodialysis with blood flow \>250 mL/minute;
- Need of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) for signs of middle molecules intoxication (e.g. B2M \>30 mg/L, peripheral neuropathy, cardiovascular comorbidities) or for intradialytic hypotension.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute coronary syndrome;
- Acute hemorrage;
- Enrollment in another study protocol;
- Active infection;
- Malignancy;
- Inability to provide written signed consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantatio Unit, StOrsola University Hospital
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Related Publications (22)
O'Lone E, Viecelli AK, Craig JC, Tong A, Sautenet B, Roy D, Herrington WG, Herzog CA, Jafar T, Jardine M, Krane V, Levin A, Malyszko J, Rocco MV, Strippoli G, Tonelli M, Wang AYM, Wanner C, Zannad F, Winkelmayer WC, Webster AC, Wheeler DC. Cardiovascular Outcomes Reported in Hemodialysis Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jun 19;71(24):2802-2810. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.012.
PMID: 29903353BACKGROUNDLongenecker JC, Coresh J, Powe NR, Levey AS, Fink NE, Martin A, Klag MJ. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in dialysis patients compared with the general population: the CHOICE Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Jul;13(7):1918-27. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000019641.41496.1e.
PMID: 12089389BACKGROUNDKendrick J, Chonchol MB. Nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2008 Dec;4(12):672-81. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0954. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18825155BACKGROUNDZoccali C. Cardiovascular risk in uraemic patients-is it fully explained by classical risk factors? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Apr;15(4):454-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.454. No abstract available.
PMID: 10727537BACKGROUNDGeorgatzakou HT, Tzounakas VL, Kriebardis AG, Velentzas AD, Kokkalis AC, Antonelou MH, Papassideri IS. Short-term effects of hemodiafiltration versus conventional hemodialysis on erythrocyte performance. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;96(3):249-257. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2017-0285. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
PMID: 28854342BACKGROUNDHimmelfarb J, McMenamin E, McMonagle E. Plasma aminothiol oxidation in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2002 Feb;61(2):705-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00151.x.
PMID: 11849414BACKGROUNDMcIntyre NJ, Fluck RJ, McIntyre CW, Taal MW. Skin autofluorescence and the association with renal and cardiovascular risk factors in chronic kidney disease stage 3. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;6(10):2356-63. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02420311. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
PMID: 21885790BACKGROUNDKimura H, Tanaka K, Kanno M, Watanabe K, Hayashi Y, Asahi K, Suzuki H, Sato K, Sakaue M, Terawaki H, Nakayama M, Miyata T, Watanabe T. Skin autofluorescence predicts cardiovascular mortality in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial. 2014 Oct;18(5):461-7. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12160. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PMID: 24456287BACKGROUNDWautier JL, Schmidt AM. Protein glycation: a firm link to endothelial cell dysfunction. Circ Res. 2004 Aug 6;95(3):233-8. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000137876.28454.64.
PMID: 15297385BACKGROUNDHangai M, Takebe N, Honma H, Sasaki A, Chida A, Nakano R, Togashi H, Nakagawa R, Oda T, Matsui M, Yashiro S, Nagasawa K, Kajiwara T, Takahashi K, Takahashi Y, Satoh J, Ishigaki Y. Association of Advanced Glycation End Products with coronary Artery Calcification in Japanese Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes as Assessed by Skin Autofluorescence. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016 Oct 1;23(10):1178-1187. doi: 10.5551/jat.30155. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PMID: 26961217BACKGROUNDWang CC, Wang YC, Wang GJ, Shen MY, Chang YL, Liou SY, Chen HC, Chang CT. Skin Autofluorescence Is Associated with Endothelial Dysfunction in Uremic Subjects on Hemodialysis. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147771. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26809145BACKGROUNDHofmann B, Jacobs K, Navarrete Santos A, Wienke A, Silber RE, Simm A. Relationship between cardiac tissue glycation and skin autofluorescence in patients with coronary artery disease. Diabetes Metab. 2015 Nov;41(5):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
PMID: 25553578BACKGROUNDVanholder R, Pletinck A, Schepers E, Glorieux G. Biochemical and Clinical Impact of Organic Uremic Retention Solutes: A Comprehensive Update. Toxins (Basel). 2018 Jan 8;10(1):33. doi: 10.3390/toxins10010033.
PMID: 29316724BACKGROUNDGryp T, Vanholder R, Vaneechoutte M, Glorieux G. p-Cresyl Sulfate. Toxins (Basel). 2017 Jan 29;9(2):52. doi: 10.3390/toxins9020052.
PMID: 28146081BACKGROUNDHung SC, Kuo KL, Wu CC, Tarng DC. Indoxyl Sulfate: A Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 7;6(2):e005022. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005022. No abstract available.
PMID: 28174171BACKGROUNDLiabeuf S, Lenglet A, Desjardins L, Neirynck N, Glorieux G, Lemke HD, Vanholder R, Diouf M, Choukroun G, Massy ZA; European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Plasma beta-2 microglobulin is associated with cardiovascular disease in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 2012 Dec;82(12):1297-303. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.301. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
PMID: 22895515BACKGROUNDDesjardins L, Liabeuf S, Lenglet A, Lemke HD, Vanholder R, Choukroun G, Massy ZA; European Uremic Toxin (EUTox) Work Group. Association between free light chain levels, and disease progression and mortality in chronic kidney disease. Toxins (Basel). 2013 Nov 8;5(11):2058-73. doi: 10.3390/toxins5112058.
PMID: 24217396BACKGROUNDGutierrez OM, Mannstadt M, Isakova T, Rauh-Hain JA, Tamez H, Shah A, Smith K, Lee H, Thadhani R, Juppner H, Wolf M. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 7;359(6):584-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706130.
PMID: 18687639BACKGROUNDMenegatti E, Rossi D, Chiara M, Alpa M, Sena LM, Roccatello D. Cytokine release pathway in mononuclear cells stimulated in vitro by dialysis membranes. Am J Nephrol. 2002 Sep-Dec;22(5-6):509-14. doi: 10.1159/000065288.
PMID: 12381952BACKGROUNDMemoli B, Postiglione L, Cianciaruso B, Bisesti V, Cimmaruta C, Marzano L, Minutolo R, Cuomo V, Guida B, Andreucci M, Rossi G. Role of different dialysis membranes in the release of interleukin-6-soluble receptor in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 2000 Jul;58(1):417-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00181.x.
PMID: 10886590BACKGROUNDWalker RJ, Sutherland WH, De Jong SA. Effect of changing from a cellulose acetate to a polysulphone dialysis membrane on protein oxidation and inflammation markers. Clin Nephrol. 2004 Mar;61(3):198-206. doi: 10.5414/cnp61198.
PMID: 15077871BACKGROUNDFuruta M, Kuragano T, Kida A, Kitamura R, Nanami M, Otaki Y, Nonoguchi H, Matsumoto A, Nakanishi T. A crossover study of the acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate and polysulfone membranes for elderly hemodialysis patients: the effect on hemodynamic, nutritional, and inflammatory conditions. ASAIO J. 2011 Jul-Aug;57(4):293-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31821796f1.
PMID: 21499075BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gaetano La Manna, Prof
StOrsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2020
First Posted
September 18, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03