Parent Feedback Intervention Targeting Student Transitions and Alcohol Related Trajectories (+) Efficacy Study
FITSTART+
Extension and Online Adaptation of the FITSTART Parent-based Intervention to Reduce Drinking Among First-year Students
2 other identifiers
interventional
266
1 country
1
Brief Summary
FITSTART (Feedback Intervention Targeting Student Transitions and Risk Trajectories) is a parent-based social norms intervention that has been shown to reduce risky drinking in incoming first year students.This program uses normative feedback to correct parents overestimation of other parents negative alcohol-related parenting practices (e.g., number of drinks parents would permit their college student to consume). Theory and research suggests that correcting those common misperceptions can motivate parents to adjust their own behaviors (e.g., reducing the number of drinks they would permit), which, in turn, can impact college student drinking. Despite FITSTARTs success, the design of the program limits participation to only students who have parents who can attend on-campus orientation sessions during the summer months before the start of the Fall semester. To address this limitation and extend the previous work, the proposed randomized clinical trial (RCT) will evaluate the efficacy of an online adaptation of the FITSTART(+) PBI program. To examine the efficacy of the newly developed FITSTART+ PBI web app, the proposed RCT will use a longitudinal design to examine if students self-report drinking and related negative consequences during their first semester in college significantly differed between FITSTART+ PBI (intervention app) and a control version of the app. Self-reported drinking and consequences are expected to be lower amongst students with parents randomized to FITSTART+ PBI relative to those with parents randomized to the control app.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2023
CompletedJune 1, 2023
May 1, 2023
8 months
September 8, 2020
April 24, 2023
May 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change From Baseline Typical Weekly Drinking at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, participants reported the typical quantity of standard alcohol drinks consumed on each day of the week during the past 30 days using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Quantity of drinks reported on each day of the week at baseline and 1-month were then summed (separately) to create a composite variable assessing typical weekly drinking at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of typical drinks per week was subtracted from the baseline measure of typical drinks per week such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Typical Weekly Drinking at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, participants reported the typical quantity of standard alcohol drinks consumed on each day of the week during the past 30 days using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Quantity of drinks reported on each day of the week at baseline and 1-month were then summed (separately) to create a composite variable assessing typical weekly drinking at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of typical drinks per week was subtracted from the baseline measure of typical drinks per week such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Frequency of Alcohol Consequences at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, the number of types of negative alcohol-related consequences experienced out of a list of 14 common negative alcohol-related consequences (past 30 days) were summed to create a composite variable at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of negative consequences was subtracted from the baseline measure of negative consequences such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consequences during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consequences during this period.
baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Frequency of Alcohol Consequences at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, the number of types of negative alcohol-related consequences experienced out of a list of 14 common negative alcohol-related consequences (past 30 days) were summed to create a composite variable at each time point. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of negative consequences was subtracted from the baseline measure of negative consequences such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consequences during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consequences during this period.
baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of maximum drinks on one occasion from the Frequency, Quantity, Max (FQM) measure was used to assess peak drinks on one occasion over the past 30 days. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of peak drinks was subtracted from the baseline measure of peak drinks such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Quantity/Frequency/Peak Alcohol Use at 6 Months
At baseline and the 6-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of maximum drinks on one occasion from the Frequency, Quantity, Max (FQM) measure was used to assess peak drinks on one occasion over the past 30 days. To compute the outcome, the 6-month measure of peak drinks was subtracted from the baseline measure of peak drinks such that a positive value indicates a decrease in consumption during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in consumption during this period.
baseline, 6 months
Change From Baseline Heavy Episodic Drinking at 1 Month
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of times students reported a heavy episodic drinking (HED) event in the past two weeks. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of HED was subtracted from the baseline measure of HED such that a positive value indicates a decrease in HED events during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in HED events during this period.
baseline, 1 month
Change From Baseline Heavy Episodic Drinking at 6 Months
At baseline and the 1-month follow-up, an item assessing the number of times students reported a heavy episodic drinking (HED) event in the past two weeks. To compute the outcome, the 1-month measure of HED was subtracted from the baseline measure of HED such that a positive value indicates a decrease in HED events during this period and a negative value indicates an increase in HED events during this period.
baseline, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention App
EXPERIMENTALStudents in arm of the study will have a parent who has access to the following content in the parent app: (a) FITSTART+ PBI materials (personalized normative feedback quiz, information on college student drinking, and alcohol-specific advice for parents of first year students); (b) general advice for parents of college students (e.g., improving communication; reducing conflict); (c) information about university resources; and (d) a community section (parents can view other parent profiles, submit family photos, and view family photos submitted by other parents).
Control App
PLACEBO COMPARATORStudents in this arm of the study will have a parent who has access to the following content in the parent app: (a) general advice for parents of college students (e.g., improving communication; reducing conflict); (b) information about university resources; and (c) a community section (parents can view other parent profiles, submit family photos, and view family photos submitted by other parents).
Interventions
Personalized normative feedback on other parents behaviors + alcohol-specific parenting advice + general parenting advice
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-year incoming LMU student consented to participate in the study and their parent/guardian created a profile on the app
You may not qualify if:
- Outside of the students age range
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loyola Marymount
Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This trial was conducted in the first on-campus semester post-Covid, and there were several restrictions regarding student life in effect. This likely affected student alcohol use by limiting social drinking events and willingness to engage in those events (depressing the levels of risky drinking). Thus, the ability to detect changes in drinking was likely to have been impacted.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Bradley Trager, Research Scientist
- Organization
- Loyola Marymount University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph W LaBrie, PhD
Loyola Marymount University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Intervention condition is randomly assigned and the intervention delivery is digital, through a web app. Senior members of the research team will have a record of the participants randomized to each condition but the delivery of all intervention content is automated within the app. Junior members of the research team responsible for tracking participants and sending follow-up survey reminders will not be aware of participant condition assignment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2020
First Posted
September 16, 2020
Study Start
July 22, 2021
Primary Completion
March 22, 2022
Study Completion
March 22, 2022
Last Updated
June 1, 2023
Results First Posted
June 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- 1 year following publication of results.
- Access Criteria
- Study materials and data will be made available to the public on secure web portal.
Study results will be reported in aggregate, so that individual participants will not be identifiable in any research reports or presentations of the proposed study. A de-identified dataset will be made available to researchers 1 year after the initial publication of results. This dataset will include participant demographics and outcome measures assessed at baseline and the follow-up surveys. A data dictionary will be provided.