Lenient Rate Control Versus Strict Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation. The Danish Atrial Fibrillation Randomised Clinical Trial
DanAF
1 other identifier
interventional
350
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart arrhythmia with a prevalence of approximately 2% in the western world. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of death and morbidity. The comparable effects of a lenient rate control strategy and a strict rate control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation are uncertain and only one trial has assessed this previously in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. The investigators will therefore undertake a randomised, superiority trial at four hospitals in Denmark.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 31, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2026
CompletedMarch 16, 2022
March 1, 2022
4.9 years
August 26, 2020
March 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score
After 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Days alive outside hospital
After 6 months
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT)
After 1 year
Short Form-36 (SF-36) mental component score
1 year
Serious adverse events
1 year
Other Outcomes (71)
All-cause mortality
1 year
All-cause mortality
2 year
All-cause mortality
After 3 years
- +68 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lenient rate control
EXPERIMENTALTreating physicians will target a resting heart rate between 80 and 110 beats per minute on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.
Strict rate control
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreating physicians will target a resting heart rate a mean resting heart rate \< 80 bpm on a 12-lead resting ECG measured over 1 minute after 5 minutes of rest.
Interventions
Treatment will be provided according to current guidelines and as such the algorithm for treatment will be differentiated based on the status of left ventricular ejection fraction. For participants with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) will be the primary therapy. Secondary therapies may include digoxin or amiodarone. For participants with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, the primary therapy will be beta-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) or non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (verapamil) with secondary therapy consisting of digoxin or amiodarone. Pacing therapies, alone or with atrioventricular node ablation, are utilised as indicated in the view of the treating physician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Rate control must be accepted as being the primary management strategy going forward. Consideration towards whether rhythm control is more appropriate must be considered, especially given the results of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial (EAST).
- Informed consent.
- Adult (18 years or older).
You may not qualify if:
- No informed consent.
- Initial heart rate under 80 bpm at rest (assessed via ECG before randomisation).
- Less than 3 weeks of anticoagulation with new oral anticoagulants or 4 weeks with efficient warfarin if indicated.
- If the treating physician deems that the participant is not fit to be randomised into both groups based on an individual assessment. Such a decision will be made before randomisation by the treating physician. This can e.g. be participants dependent on a high ventricular rate to maintain a sufficient cardiac output. Such participants could be participants with heart failure, participants with a hemodynamically significant valve dysfunction, or severely dehydrated participants.
- Participants who are haemodynamically unstable and therefore require immediate electrical cardioversion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Holbaek Sygehuslead
- Odense University Hospitalcollaborator
- Hvidovre University Hospitalcollaborator
- Zealand University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Holbæk Hospital
Holbæk, 4300, Denmark
Hvidovre University Hospital
Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000, Denmark
Zealand University Hospital - Roskilde
Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Cold IM, Feinberg JB, Brandes A, Davidsen U, Dixen U, Dominguez H, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Hadad R, Kristensen KE, van Le DT, Nielsen EE, Olsen MH, Pedersen OD, Raymond IE, Sajadieh A, Soja AMB, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a statistical analysis plan for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2023 Apr 1;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07247-7.
PMID: 37005636DERIVEDFeinberg JB, Olsen MH, Brandes A, Raymond L, Nielsen WB, Nielsen EE, Stensgaard-Hansen F, Dixen U, Pedersen OD, Gang UJO, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. Lenient rate control versus strict rate control for atrial fibrillation: a protocol for the Danish Atrial Fibrillation (DanAF) randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 31;11(3):e044744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044744.
PMID: 33789853DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joshua Feinberg, MD
Holbaek University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessors will be blinded. Participants will not be informed of the heart rate target or actual heart rate. Treatment providers managing the heart rate target will not be blinded as the intervention requires information of the heart rate. Other treatment providers will not be informed of the heart rate target.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2020
First Posted
September 9, 2020
Study Start
March 31, 2021
Primary Completion
March 2, 2026
Study Completion
March 2, 2026
Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Not possible to describe yet but will be made available within a timely manner after publication of results.
- Access Criteria
- Sharing will abide by the General Data Protection Regulation and the Danish data protections laws.
We will share anonymised data in a data repository.