NCT04148664

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare overall clinical outcomes between High Power Short Duration (HPSD) and standard radiofrequency (RF) ablation settings for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation in the treatment of subjects with paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 30, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 1, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 3, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2020

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

October 30, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Ablation Duration

    RF ablation duration from start of first pulmonary vein isolation lesion to end of last lesion

    During Ablation

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Maximum esophageal temperature

    During ablation

  • Maximum esophageal temperature rise

    During ablation

  • Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation

    assessed at 6 and 12 months post-ablation

  • Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation

    assessed at 6 and 12 months post-ablation

  • % pulmonary vein pairs isolated with first encirclement

    During Ablation

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard Catheter Settings

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group 1 - Standard RF ablation settings

Procedure: Catheter ablation with Standard RF ablation settings

High Power Short Duration (HPSD)

EXPERIMENTAL

Group 2 - High power short duration RF

Procedure: Catheter ablation with High Power Short Duration RF ablation settings

Interventions

Standard RF ablation settings (n=30): Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.

Standard Catheter Settings

High power short duration RF (n=30): Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.

High Power Short Duration (HPSD)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female ≥18 years of age at their pre-operative visit.
  • Patient is scheduled to have their first AF ablation
  • Paroxysmal or persistent AF
  • Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior AF ablation
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 6 months
  • Known esophageal ulcer or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within prior 6 months
  • Intent to perform adjunctive left atrial ablation, including posterior wall isolation, left atrial appendage isolation, mitral or other linear lesions.
  • Prior rheumatic heart disease or significant mitral stenosis
  • Mechanical mitral valve replacement
  • Long lasting persistent AF \> 1 year
  • Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with LV ejection fraction LVEF\<35%
  • Prior left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device
  • Prior septal occlusion device
  • Pregnancy
  • Pacemaker, defibrillator or any contraindication to MRI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Perino AC, Leef GC, Cluckey A, Yunus FN, Askari M, Heidenreich PA, Narayan SM, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Secular trends in success rate of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The SMASH-AF cohort. Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

    PMID: 30502925BACKGROUND
  • Kim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):961-967. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw128.

    PMID: 27256420BACKGROUND
  • Asbach S, Biermann J, Bode C, Faber TS. Early Heparin Administration Reduces Risk for Left Atrial Thrombus Formation during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087. doi: 10.4061/2011/615087. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

    PMID: 21747989BACKGROUND
  • Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Feb;16(2):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.031.

    PMID: 30712645BACKGROUND
  • Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PMID: 30067486BACKGROUND
  • Nair KK, Shurrab M, Skanes A, Danon A, Birnie D, Morillo C, Chauhan V, Mangat I, Ayala-Paredes F, Champagne J, Nault I, Tang A, Verma A, Lashevsky I, Singh SM, Crystal E. The prevalence and risk factors for atrioesophageal fistula after percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Canadian experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):139-44. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9853-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

    PMID: 24317916BACKGROUND
  • Nair KK, Danon A, Valaparambil A, Koruth JS, Singh SM. Atrioesophageal Fistula: A Review. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Oct 31;8(3):1331. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1331. eCollection 2015 Oct-Nov.

    PMID: 27957213BACKGROUND
  • Han HC, Ha FJ, Sanders P, Spencer R, Teh AW, O'Donnell D, Farouque O, Lim HS. Atrioesophageal Fistula: Clinical Presentation, Procedural Characteristics, Diagnostic Investigations, and Treatment Outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005579.

    PMID: 29109075BACKGROUND
  • Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, Nalliah C, Qian P, Barry T, Nadri F, Samanta R, Tran Y, Thomas S, Kovoor P, Thiagalingam A. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):874-880. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw077.

    PMID: 27207815BACKGROUND
  • Baher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, Marashly Q, Kholmovski EG, Siebermair J, Acharya M, Aljuaid M, Morris AK, Kaur G, Han FT, Wilson BD, Steinberg BA, Marrouche NF, Chelu MG. High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1583-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

    PMID: 30573123BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Catheter Ablation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Radiofrequency AblationRadiofrequency TherapyTherapeuticsAblation TechniquesSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Edward P Gerstenfeld, MD

    Chief of Cardiac Electrophysiology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a multi-center prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Enrollment of 60 subjects undergoing clinically-indicated AF ablation is planned with 1:1 block randomization (standard 'low power' RF settings n=30, HPSD n=30 and allowing for 10 drop-outs / consent withdrawals). Follow-up will be over 12 months.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2019

First Posted

November 1, 2019

Study Start

December 3, 2019

Primary Completion

December 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 30, 2022

Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We are open to collaboration but do not plan to give our data to others.

Locations