A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Short-AF
SHORT-AF: A Randomized Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study to compare overall clinical outcomes between High Power Short Duration (HPSD) and standard radiofrequency (RF) ablation settings for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation in the treatment of subjects with paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedAugust 16, 2023
August 1, 2023
12 months
October 30, 2019
August 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ablation Duration
RF ablation duration from start of first pulmonary vein isolation lesion to end of last lesion
During Ablation
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Maximum esophageal temperature
During ablation
Maximum esophageal temperature rise
During ablation
Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation
assessed at 6 and 12 months post-ablation
Freedom from Atrial Fibrillation
assessed at 6 and 12 months post-ablation
% pulmonary vein pairs isolated with first encirclement
During Ablation
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Catheter Settings
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 - Standard RF ablation settings
High Power Short Duration (HPSD)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2 - High power short duration RF
Interventions
Standard RF ablation settings (n=30): Maximum 35W for 20-40 seconds, per operator standard.
High power short duration RF (n=30): Maximum 50 Watts for 5-15 seconds, per operator standard.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥18 years of age at their pre-operative visit.
- Patient is scheduled to have their first AF ablation
- Paroxysmal or persistent AF
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior AF ablation
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the previous 6 months
- Known esophageal ulcer or gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within prior 6 months
- Intent to perform adjunctive left atrial ablation, including posterior wall isolation, left atrial appendage isolation, mitral or other linear lesions.
- Prior rheumatic heart disease or significant mitral stenosis
- Mechanical mitral valve replacement
- Long lasting persistent AF \> 1 year
- Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, with LV ejection fraction LVEF\<35%
- Prior left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion device
- Prior septal occlusion device
- Pregnancy
- Pacemaker, defibrillator or any contraindication to MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (10)
Perino AC, Leef GC, Cluckey A, Yunus FN, Askari M, Heidenreich PA, Narayan SM, Wang PJ, Turakhia MP. Secular trends in success rate of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The SMASH-AF cohort. Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
PMID: 30502925BACKGROUNDKim TH, Park J, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pulmonary vein reconnection predicts good clinical outcome after second catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):961-967. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw128.
PMID: 27256420BACKGROUNDAsbach S, Biermann J, Bode C, Faber TS. Early Heparin Administration Reduces Risk for Left Atrial Thrombus Formation during Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:615087. doi: 10.4061/2011/615087. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
PMID: 21747989BACKGROUNDWinkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, Mead RH, Kong MH, Engel G, Salcedo J, Trivedi CG, Gianni C, Jais P, Natale A, Day JD. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Feb;16(2):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.031.
PMID: 30712645BACKGROUNDLeshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Biophysical Characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PMID: 30067486BACKGROUNDNair KK, Shurrab M, Skanes A, Danon A, Birnie D, Morillo C, Chauhan V, Mangat I, Ayala-Paredes F, Champagne J, Nault I, Tang A, Verma A, Lashevsky I, Singh SM, Crystal E. The prevalence and risk factors for atrioesophageal fistula after percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Canadian experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):139-44. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9853-z. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
PMID: 24317916BACKGROUNDNair KK, Danon A, Valaparambil A, Koruth JS, Singh SM. Atrioesophageal Fistula: A Review. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Oct 31;8(3):1331. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1331. eCollection 2015 Oct-Nov.
PMID: 27957213BACKGROUNDHan HC, Ha FJ, Sanders P, Spencer R, Teh AW, O'Donnell D, Farouque O, Lim HS. Atrioesophageal Fistula: Clinical Presentation, Procedural Characteristics, Diagnostic Investigations, and Treatment Outcomes. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005579.
PMID: 29109075BACKGROUNDBhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, Nalliah C, Qian P, Barry T, Nadri F, Samanta R, Tran Y, Thomas S, Kovoor P, Thiagalingam A. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):874-880. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw077.
PMID: 27207815BACKGROUNDBaher A, Kheirkhahan M, Rechenmacher SJ, Marashly Q, Kholmovski EG, Siebermair J, Acharya M, Aljuaid M, Morris AK, Kaur G, Han FT, Wilson BD, Steinberg BA, Marrouche NF, Chelu MG. High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Novel Index of Esophageal Injury. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1583-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
PMID: 30573123BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward P Gerstenfeld, MD
Chief of Cardiac Electrophysiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2019
First Posted
November 1, 2019
Study Start
December 3, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
August 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We are open to collaboration but do not plan to give our data to others.