Study Stopped
Internal company decision
A Study of Brexanolone for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brexanolone in participants on ventilator support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2022
CompletedAugust 19, 2022
August 1, 2022
7 months
September 1, 2020
July 1, 2022
August 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Are Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 28
Respiratory failure is defined based on resource utilization, requiring at least one of the following: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, oxygen delivered by high-flow nasal cannula (heated, humidified oxygen delivered via reinforced nasal cannula at flow rates \>20 liter/minute with fraction of delivered oxygen \>=0.5), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Percentage of participants who were alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28 were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
From first dose of investigational product up to end of study (up to Day 40)
Number of Participants Who Died Through Day 28
From screening up to Day 28
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants receiving mechanical ventilation as standard of care were randomized to receive a 60-hour single continuous intravenous (IV) infusion of brexanolone-matching placebo.
Brexanolone
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receiving mechanical ventilation as standard of care were randomized to receive a 60-hour single continuous IV infusion of brexanolone at 70 micrograms per kilogram per hour (mcg/kg/h) for 58 hours followed by a 2-hour taper of brexanolone at 35 mcg/kg/h.
Interventions
Administered as IV infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant was confirmed positive for the novel coronavirus responsible for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at Screening
- Participant had a presumptive diagnosis of ARDS at Screening and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen \[PF ratio\]) less than (\<) 300 prior to randomization
- Participant was intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation prior to randomization
- Participants must had initiated mechanical ventilation within 48 hours prior to screening, or had an immediate clinical plan for such intervention at time of screening
- Participant was likely to survive, in the opinion of the investigator, for at least 72 hours from the time of screening
You may not qualify if:
- Participant had fulminant hepatic failure at Screening
- Participant had end stage renal disease at Screening
- Participant had a known allergy to progesterone, allopregnanolone, or any excipients in the brexanolone injection
- Participant was concurrently participating in another clinical trial for an investigational product or device at screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Sage Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93701, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48912, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Sage Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated early due to sponsor's decision and there were no safety concerns.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Monitor
- Organization
- Sage Therapeutics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2020
First Posted
September 3, 2020
Study Start
December 18, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2021
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
August 19, 2022
Results First Posted
July 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data sharing will be consistent with the results submission policy of ClinicalTrials.gov.