Assessing People's Hospital Outpatient Appointment Preferences in the United Kingdom
1 other identifier
interventional
1,481
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The sustainability of the United Kingdom's National Health Service's (NHS) is threatened immediately by Covid-19 and continually by an increasing prevalence of long-conditions that cannot be cured but can be maintained. Shifting traditional face-to-face outpatient appointments to remote video consultations may help the NHS continue to serve patients efficiently. While much research has examined healthcare providers' attitudes and beliefs about remote video consultations, less has attempted to understand how NHS service providers should invite patients to attend them. The present study examines how the framing of an invitation to attend a hospital outpatient appointment by video influences the proportion of people who agree to attend by video. It also explores some of the barriers and facilitators people may experience to attending appointments by video across diagnostic complexities and age groups. The results of this study should help hospitals better present patients with the option to attend video consultations where appropriate, and provide support to mitigate common barriers to people's willingness to give video consultations a go.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2020
CompletedNovember 5, 2020
November 1, 2020
2 months
August 24, 2020
November 3, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response to the outpatient invitation
Participants responses will indicate whether they would prefer a video or in-person appointment.
One day
Study Arms (3)
Video Default
EXPERIMENTALThe case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend your next consultation by video. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) Yes, I would be happy to attend a video consultation. B) If possible, I would rather attend the appointment in person.
In-Person Default
EXPERIMENTALThe case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend your next consultation in person. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) Yes, I would be happy to attend an in-person consultation. B) If possible, I would rather attend the appointment by video.
Active Choice
EXPERIMENTALThe case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend a consultation by video or in person. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) I would prefer a video consultation. B) I would prefer an in-person consultation.
Interventions
The case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend your next consultation by video. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) Yes, I would be happy to attend a video consultation. B) If possible, I would rather attend the appointment in person.
The case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend your next consultation in person. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) Yes, I would be happy to attend an in-person consultation. B) If possible, I would rather attend the appointment by video.
The case and response options participants in this group will be asked to consider is provided below. Imagine that a hospital clinician you have been seeing for over a year tells you that that upon reviewing your patient notes they would like you to attend a consultation by video or in person. Consider each of the response options below, and select the one that best describes how you would respond to your clinician. A) I would prefer a video consultation. B) I would prefer an in-person consultation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All participants will:
- be 18 years old or older;
- be resident in the United Kingdom; and
- indicate having been diagnosed with a chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke etc.
You may not qualify if:
- be less than 18 years old;
- not be resident in the United Kingdom; and
- not indicate having been diagnosed with a chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kelly Schmidtke
Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 7HL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelly A Schmidtke, PhD
University of Warwick
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2020
First Posted
September 2, 2020
Study Start
September 11, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2020
Study Completion
October 31, 2020
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The anonymised individual level data may be made available upon reasonable request within 10 years of the project being published in an academic jourhnal or may be published with an article if required by the journal.