NCT04532671

Brief Summary

In patients using Inlay restorations will the use of 3D printed PEEK material and technique have superior clinical performance to milled PEEK one or to milled composite resin inlays, evaluation of restorations will be done at baseline, six months and 12 months using the modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation system

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 17, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 31, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

August 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Marginal integrity

    Visual inspection with explorer and mirror, Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface

    12 months

  • marginal discoloration

    Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches, the degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth

    12 months

  • secondary caries

    Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time

    12 months

  • post operative sensitivity

    Asking the patient if there is any associated pain after adding the restoration

    12 months

Study Arms (3)

Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

OTHER

Poly ether ether keton (PEEK) is acknowledged as a high-performance polymer in engineering \& medical applications due to its favorable mechanical and chemical properties.

Other: Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

CADCAM poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

OTHER

PEEK was predominantly processed out of CAD/CAM-supported milled out of prefabricated blanks.

Other: CADCAM Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

indirect resin composite

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In CAD/CAM resin composite blocks, properties of flexibility and ease of use similar to that of resin composite are combined with durability and surface finish properties similar to that of ceramics

Other: indirect resin composite

Interventions

PEEK has been used in dentistry so far in certain fields as for, removable and fixed dental prostheses, implants, and implant abutments as well as orthodontic devices, whereas in literature, it is mostly mentioned in relation to prosthetics. PEEK was predominantly processed out of CAD/CAM-supported milled out of prefabricated blanks. Producing dental restorations via Additive manufacturing is still hardly widespread

Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

Increased demand for long-lasting restoration's properties have led to many improvements in the production techniques of posterior restorations such as CAD/CAM systems. This technique simplifies the production of indirect restorations and make it possible to use advanced materials as PEEK

CADCAM poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

CADCAM resin composite blocks using milling process

indirect resin composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aging greater than or equal 18 years.
  • Patients with a high level of oral hygiene.
  • Each patient enrolled in the study had moderate to large size carious lesion or defective restoration to be replaced on a maxillary or mandibular permanent molar.
  • Patients with good likelihood of recall availability.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with general/systemic illness.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Concomitant participation in another research study.
  • Inability to comply with study procedures.
  • Heavy bruxism habits.
  • Last experience with allergic reactions against any components of the used materials.
  • Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

poly(phthalazine ether sulfone ketone)

Study Officials

  • Donia M elshafey, master

    Cairo University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

donia M elshafey, master

CONTACT

dina E mohamed, Doctorate

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principle investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Posted

August 31, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

October 1, 2021

Study Completion

October 1, 2022

Last Updated

August 31, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Undecided: It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
expecting to have all the data during october 2022
Access Criteria
IPD through contacting the main author doniamamdouh@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.com
More information