Occlusal Caries
10
0
3
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 10 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (10)
Clinical Performance of Flowable Giomer Versus Nanofilled Composite in Conservative Occlusal Cavities
Evaluation of Cytokines Level as an Indicator of Pulp Inflammation and Its Relation to the Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Affected With Proximal Versus Occlusal Decay
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Conservative Occlusal Restorations
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
The Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities (Randomized)
Evaluation of Clinical Performance for Recent Non Coated Glass Ionomer in Posterior Teeth
Management of Occlusal Caries Using Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Early Treatments for Preventing Occlusal Caries Lesions
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Inlays