NCT04531280

Brief Summary

This study examines the implications of providing hospital-level care in rural homes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 2, 2020

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 18, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 7, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 7, 2021

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 30, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

August 2, 2020

Results QC Date

February 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

home hospitalhospital at homehospital in the home

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Patients That Completed Their Rural Home Hospitalization

    Rural home hospital is when eligible rural patients receive hospital level care at home. This measure includes patients that were hospitalized in rural home hospital for treatment for their acute condition and were discharged from rural home hospital after their treatment was complete. The number in the data table reflects the number of patients that completed their home hospitalization.

    Day of admission to day of discharge, estimated 10 days later

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • 3-item Care Transition Measure

    Once, within Day of discharge to 7 days later

  • Picker Experience Questionnaire

    Once, within Day of discharge to 7 days later

  • Global Satisfaction: Scale

    Once, between Day of discharge to 7 days later

  • Perceived Acceptability of RHH Care

    Day of discharge to 30 days later

  • Perceived Safety, Quality of Care, Caregiver Burden

    Day of discharge to 30 days later

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Home hospital care

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive hospital-level care in their home, as a substitute to traditional hospital care

Other: Home hospital care

Interventions

Patients receive hospital-level care in their home.

Home hospital care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \>=18 years old
  • Any infectious process (e.g., pneumonia, diverticulitis, cellulitis, complicated urinary tract infection)
  • Heart failure exacerbation
  • Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
  • Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response
  • Diabetes and its complications
  • Venous thromboembolism: This includes a patient who requires therapeutic anticoagulation and concomitant monitoring (thus requiring inpatient status)
  • Gout exacerbation
  • Chronic kidney disease with volume overload
  • Hypertensive urgency
  • End of life / desires only medical management: Regarding a patient who desires only medical management, this includes a patient who requires acute care for symptom management but declines any surgical intervention. This may include a patient who is about to transition to hospice care, for example, but still has the functional capacity to meet our criteria below. Under these circumstances, we would make sure that various contingencies, including possible transition to hospice care or hospital readmission, are completely understood by patients and caregivers as applicable.
  • Lives in rural or ultra-rural area (see definitions in Appendix) that can be served by one of our RHH clinicians.
  • Has capacity to consent to study
  • Can identify a potential caregiver who agrees to stay with patient for first 24 hours of admission. Caregiver must be competent to call care team if a problem is evident to her/him. After 24 hours, this caregiver should be available for as-needed spot checks on the patient: This criterion maybe waived for highly competent patients at the patient and clinician's discretion.
  • Age \>= 18 years old
  • +3 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute delirium, as determined by the Confusion Assessment Method
  • Cannot establish peripheral access (or access requires ultrasound guidance, unless ultrasound guidance is available)
  • Secondary condition: active non-melanoma/prostate cancer, end-stage renal disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebral vascular accident, acute hemorrhage
  • Primary diagnosis requires controlled substances
  • Cannot independently ambulate to bedside commode
  • As deemed by on-call MD, patient likely to require any of the following procedures that have not already occurred: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic procedure, blood transfusion, cardiac stress test, or surgery
  • For pneumonia: Most recent CURB65 \> 3: new confusion, BUN \> 19mg/dL, respiratory rate\>=30/min, systolic blood pressure\<90mmHg, Age\>=65 (\<14% 30-day mortality); Most recent SMRTCO \> 2: systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg (2pts), multilobar CXR involvement (1pt), respiratory rate \>= 30/min, heart rate \>= 125, new confusion, oxygen saturation \<= 90% (\<10% chance of intensive respiratory or vasopressor support); Absence of clear infiltrate on imaging; Cavitary lesion on imaging; Pulmonary effusion of unknown etiology; O2 saturation \< 90% despite 5L O2
  • For heart failure: Has a left ventricular assist device; GWTG-HF17 (\>10% in-hospital mortality) or ADHERE18 (high risk or intermediate risk 1)\*; Severe pulmonary hypertension
  • For complicated urinary tract infection: Absence of pyuria; Most recent qSOFA \> 1 (SBP≤100 mmHg, RR≥22, GCS\<15 \[any AMS\]) (if sepsis, \>10% mortality)
  • For other infection: Most recent qSOFA \> 1 (SBP≤100 mmHg, RR≥22, GCS\<15 \[any AMS\]) (if sepsis, \>10% mortality)
  • For COPD: BAP-65 score \> 3 (BUN\>25, altered mental status, HR\>109, age\>65) (\<13% chance in-hospital mortality): exercise caution
  • For asthma: Peak expiratory flow \< 50% of normal: exercise caution
  • For diabetes and its complications: Requires IV insulin
  • For hypertensive urgency: Systolic blood pressure \> 190 mmHg; Evidence of end-organ damage; for example, acute kidney injury, focal neurologic deficits, myocardial infarction
  • For atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response: Likely to require cardioversion; New atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response; Unstable blood pressure, respiratory rate, or oxygenation; Despite IV beta and/or calcium channel blockade in the emergency department, HR remains \> 125 and SBP remains different than baseline; Less than 1 hour of time has elapsed with HR \< 125 and SBP similar or higher than baseline
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Utah Health

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Hung WW, Ross JS, Farber J, Siu AL. Evaluation of the Mobile Acute Care of the Elderly (MACE) service. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 10;173(11):990-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.478.

    PMID: 23608775BACKGROUND
  • Fong TG, Tulebaev SR, Inouye SK. Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 Apr;5(4):210-20. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.24.

    PMID: 19347026BACKGROUND
  • 2014 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report.; 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/surveillance/progress-report/index.html. Accessed April 19, 2016.

    BACKGROUND
  • Counsell SR, Holder CM, Liebenauer LL, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Kresevic DM, Quinn LM, Allen KR, Covinsky KE, Landefeld CS. Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: a randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1572-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03866.x.

    PMID: 11129745BACKGROUND
  • Leff B, Burton L, Mader SL, Naughton B, Burl J, Inouye SK, Greenough WB 3rd, Guido S, Langston C, Frick KD, Steinwachs D, Burton JR. Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 6;143(11):798-808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00008.

    PMID: 16330791BACKGROUND
  • Cryer L, Shannon SB, Van Amsterdam M, Leff B. Costs for 'hospital at home' patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1237-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132.

    PMID: 22665835BACKGROUND
  • Levine DM, Ouchi K, Blanchfield B, Diamond K, Licurse A, Pu CT, Schnipper JL. Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):729-736. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4307-z. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

    PMID: 29411238BACKGROUND
  • Bureau UC. What is Rural America?https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2017/08/rural-america.html. Published 2017. Accessed May 31, 2019.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garcia MC, Rossen LM, Bastian B, Faul M, Dowling NF, Thomas CC, Schieb L, Hong Y, Yoon PW, Iademarco MF. Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Counties - United States, 2010-2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 8;68(10):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6810a1.

    PMID: 31697657BACKGROUND
  • Parker K, Horowitz J, Brown A, Fry R, Cohn D, Igielnik R. What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities.; 2018. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3/2018/05/Pew-Research-Center-Community-Type-Full-Report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2019

    BACKGROUND
  • Creditor MC. Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 1;118(3):219-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011.

    PMID: 8417639BACKGROUND
  • Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to critical access and non-critical access hospitals, 2002-2010. JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2366.

    PMID: 23549583BACKGROUND
  • Joynt KE, Harris Y, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals. JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):45-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.902.

    PMID: 21730240BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

InfectionsHeart FailurePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAsthmaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicHypertensive Crisis

Interventions

Home Care Services, Hospital-Based

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBronchial DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System DiseasesRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesHypertensionVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Home Care ServicesCommunity Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Limitations and Caveats

Our study has limitations.1. We admitted three patients from two rural areas of Utah, limiting generalizability. Second, two out of three patients were lost to follow-up and did not complete a discharge survey or interview. These patients may have had experiences we did not capture.Third, given this was a small proof of concept, the technology systems were not integrated by design.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. David Levine
Organization
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. David Levine MD, MPH, MA

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2020

First Posted

August 28, 2020

Study Start

February 18, 2021

Primary Completion

May 7, 2021

Study Completion

May 7, 2021

Last Updated

January 30, 2025

Results First Posted

January 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations