Rural Home Hospital: Proof of Concept
Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults in Rural and Ultra-Rural Settings: Proof of Concept
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the implications of providing hospital-level care in rural homes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 7, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 30, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2025
December 1, 2024
3 months
August 2, 2020
February 5, 2024
December 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients That Completed Their Rural Home Hospitalization
Rural home hospital is when eligible rural patients receive hospital level care at home. This measure includes patients that were hospitalized in rural home hospital for treatment for their acute condition and were discharged from rural home hospital after their treatment was complete. The number in the data table reflects the number of patients that completed their home hospitalization.
Day of admission to day of discharge, estimated 10 days later
Secondary Outcomes (12)
3-item Care Transition Measure
Once, within Day of discharge to 7 days later
Picker Experience Questionnaire
Once, within Day of discharge to 7 days later
Global Satisfaction: Scale
Once, between Day of discharge to 7 days later
Perceived Acceptability of RHH Care
Day of discharge to 30 days later
Perceived Safety, Quality of Care, Caregiver Burden
Day of discharge to 30 days later
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Home hospital care
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive hospital-level care in their home, as a substitute to traditional hospital care
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>=18 years old
- Any infectious process (e.g., pneumonia, diverticulitis, cellulitis, complicated urinary tract infection)
- Heart failure exacerbation
- Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
- Atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response
- Diabetes and its complications
- Venous thromboembolism: This includes a patient who requires therapeutic anticoagulation and concomitant monitoring (thus requiring inpatient status)
- Gout exacerbation
- Chronic kidney disease with volume overload
- Hypertensive urgency
- End of life / desires only medical management: Regarding a patient who desires only medical management, this includes a patient who requires acute care for symptom management but declines any surgical intervention. This may include a patient who is about to transition to hospice care, for example, but still has the functional capacity to meet our criteria below. Under these circumstances, we would make sure that various contingencies, including possible transition to hospice care or hospital readmission, are completely understood by patients and caregivers as applicable.
- Lives in rural or ultra-rural area (see definitions in Appendix) that can be served by one of our RHH clinicians.
- Has capacity to consent to study
- Can identify a potential caregiver who agrees to stay with patient for first 24 hours of admission. Caregiver must be competent to call care team if a problem is evident to her/him. After 24 hours, this caregiver should be available for as-needed spot checks on the patient: This criterion maybe waived for highly competent patients at the patient and clinician's discretion.
- Age \>= 18 years old
- +3 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Acute delirium, as determined by the Confusion Assessment Method
- Cannot establish peripheral access (or access requires ultrasound guidance, unless ultrasound guidance is available)
- Secondary condition: active non-melanoma/prostate cancer, end-stage renal disease, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebral vascular accident, acute hemorrhage
- Primary diagnosis requires controlled substances
- Cannot independently ambulate to bedside commode
- As deemed by on-call MD, patient likely to require any of the following procedures that have not already occurred: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic procedure, blood transfusion, cardiac stress test, or surgery
- For pneumonia: Most recent CURB65 \> 3: new confusion, BUN \> 19mg/dL, respiratory rate\>=30/min, systolic blood pressure\<90mmHg, Age\>=65 (\<14% 30-day mortality); Most recent SMRTCO \> 2: systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg (2pts), multilobar CXR involvement (1pt), respiratory rate \>= 30/min, heart rate \>= 125, new confusion, oxygen saturation \<= 90% (\<10% chance of intensive respiratory or vasopressor support); Absence of clear infiltrate on imaging; Cavitary lesion on imaging; Pulmonary effusion of unknown etiology; O2 saturation \< 90% despite 5L O2
- For heart failure: Has a left ventricular assist device; GWTG-HF17 (\>10% in-hospital mortality) or ADHERE18 (high risk or intermediate risk 1)\*; Severe pulmonary hypertension
- For complicated urinary tract infection: Absence of pyuria; Most recent qSOFA \> 1 (SBP≤100 mmHg, RR≥22, GCS\<15 \[any AMS\]) (if sepsis, \>10% mortality)
- For other infection: Most recent qSOFA \> 1 (SBP≤100 mmHg, RR≥22, GCS\<15 \[any AMS\]) (if sepsis, \>10% mortality)
- For COPD: BAP-65 score \> 3 (BUN\>25, altered mental status, HR\>109, age\>65) (\<13% chance in-hospital mortality): exercise caution
- For asthma: Peak expiratory flow \< 50% of normal: exercise caution
- For diabetes and its complications: Requires IV insulin
- For hypertensive urgency: Systolic blood pressure \> 190 mmHg; Evidence of end-organ damage; for example, acute kidney injury, focal neurologic deficits, myocardial infarction
- For atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response: Likely to require cardioversion; New atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response; Unstable blood pressure, respiratory rate, or oxygenation; Despite IV beta and/or calcium channel blockade in the emergency department, HR remains \> 125 and SBP remains different than baseline; Less than 1 hour of time has elapsed with HR \< 125 and SBP similar or higher than baseline
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brigham and Women's Hospitallead
- Rx Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah Health
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Related Publications (13)
Hung WW, Ross JS, Farber J, Siu AL. Evaluation of the Mobile Acute Care of the Elderly (MACE) service. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 10;173(11):990-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.478.
PMID: 23608775BACKGROUNDFong TG, Tulebaev SR, Inouye SK. Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 Apr;5(4):210-20. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.24.
PMID: 19347026BACKGROUND2014 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report.; 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/surveillance/progress-report/index.html. Accessed April 19, 2016.
BACKGROUNDCounsell SR, Holder CM, Liebenauer LL, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Kresevic DM, Quinn LM, Allen KR, Covinsky KE, Landefeld CS. Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: a randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1572-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03866.x.
PMID: 11129745BACKGROUNDLeff B, Burton L, Mader SL, Naughton B, Burl J, Inouye SK, Greenough WB 3rd, Guido S, Langston C, Frick KD, Steinwachs D, Burton JR. Hospital at home: feasibility and outcomes of a program to provide hospital-level care at home for acutely ill older patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Dec 6;143(11):798-808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-11-200512060-00008.
PMID: 16330791BACKGROUNDCryer L, Shannon SB, Van Amsterdam M, Leff B. Costs for 'hospital at home' patients were 19 percent lower, with equal or better outcomes compared to similar inpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1237-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1132.
PMID: 22665835BACKGROUNDLevine DM, Ouchi K, Blanchfield B, Diamond K, Licurse A, Pu CT, Schnipper JL. Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):729-736. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4307-z. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
PMID: 29411238BACKGROUNDBureau UC. What is Rural America?https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2017/08/rural-america.html. Published 2017. Accessed May 31, 2019.
BACKGROUNDGarcia MC, Rossen LM, Bastian B, Faul M, Dowling NF, Thomas CC, Schieb L, Hong Y, Yoon PW, Iademarco MF. Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Counties - United States, 2010-2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 8;68(10):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6810a1.
PMID: 31697657BACKGROUNDParker K, Horowitz J, Brown A, Fry R, Cohn D, Igielnik R. What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities.; 2018. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3/2018/05/Pew-Research-Center-Community-Type-Full-Report-FINAL.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2019
BACKGROUNDCreditor MC. Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 1;118(3):219-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011.
PMID: 8417639BACKGROUNDJoynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries admitted to critical access and non-critical access hospitals, 2002-2010. JAMA. 2013 Apr 3;309(13):1379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2366.
PMID: 23549583BACKGROUNDJoynt KE, Harris Y, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Quality of care and patient outcomes in critical access rural hospitals. JAMA. 2011 Jul 6;306(1):45-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.902.
PMID: 21730240BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Our study has limitations.1. We admitted three patients from two rural areas of Utah, limiting generalizability. Second, two out of three patients were lost to follow-up and did not complete a discharge survey or interview. These patients may have had experiences we did not capture.Third, given this was a small proof of concept, the technology systems were not integrated by design.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Levine
- Organization
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. David Levine MD, MPH, MA
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2020
First Posted
August 28, 2020
Study Start
February 18, 2021
Primary Completion
May 7, 2021
Study Completion
May 7, 2021
Last Updated
January 30, 2025
Results First Posted
January 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share