Comparison of Desensitizing Materials
Comparison Between Two Different Desensitizing Materials in Controlling Natural Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy of two commercially available in-office desensitizing agents (Fluoraphat Pro and VivaSens®), in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2020
CompletedSeptember 1, 2020
August 1, 2020
3 months
August 19, 2020
August 30, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Likert type scale used to measure attitudes or opinions
Likert type scale grading from 0-4 0: No sensitivity 1. Very mild sensitivity 2. Mild sensitivity 3. Moderate Sensitivity 4. Severe Sensitivity to compare the efficacy of two commercially available in-office desensitizing agents (Fluoraphat Pro and VivaSens®), in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.
24 Hours
Study Arms (1)
desensitizing agents (Fluoraphat Pro and VivaSens®)
OTHER22 participants above the age of 18 years who presented to dental clinics in Riyadh Elm University with dentine hypersensitivity were randomly selected to participate in the study. Each participant has at least two teeth with natural hypersensitivity which was not caused by any iatrogenic causes or bad oral habits, so there are 44 cases divided into two groups according to the material used, each group has 22 teeth, that make it applicable to apply the studied material with every patient on individual tooth with the same variables of the oral mouth. When teeth in the hypersensitivity group were evaluated for the level of DH, all teeth were found to have Grade 4 sensitivity.
Interventions
desensitizing agents for treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females aged between 18 and 50 years
- Patient should have at least 2 teeth with dentinal hypersensitivity
- Sound tooth structure
- Willingness to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Gingival recession
- Caries
- Non-carious lesions (attrition, abrasion, erosion, abfraction)
- Teeth restored with dental filling
- Fractured or cracked tooth
- Microleakage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nourah Aljasser
Riyadh, 13311, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roula Alboouni, Prof
Riyadh Elm University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2020
First Posted
August 26, 2020
Study Start
January 6, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2019
Study Completion
February 24, 2020
Last Updated
September 1, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08