Prediction of Inspiratory Effort Response to High PEEP in Patients Recovering From ARDS
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Spontaneous breathing during the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation in ARDS may be harmful, as high respiratory drive can generate large transpulmonary pressure swings and worsen lung injury. Higher PEEP may mitigate this by reducing inspiratory effort and lung stress, but patient response is variable and difficult to predict. While improved lung compliance appears to mediate the protective effects of PEEP, its bedside assessment is complex. Preclinical data suggest that changes in compliance are inversely reflected by changes in respiratory rate, but this relationship and its clinical utility in ARDS patients remain unclear.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Aug 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
ExpectedApril 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.7 years
August 19, 2020
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lung compliance response
changes in lung compliance from one PEEP level to the subsequent higher level, expressed in percentage of change
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Esophageal pressure swing
10 minutes
Dynamic transpulmonary pressure swing
10 minutes
Respiratory rate response
10 minutes
Interventions
Initially, the patients will be ventilated using pressure support ventilation with an inspiratory pressure adjusted to achieve 6 - 8 ml/kg of PBW with a minimal esophageal pressure swing of 5 cmH2O and a PEEP of 5 cmH2O. After 5 minutes, we will collect basic and advanced respiratory monitoring, including esophageal pressure and transpulmonary pressure swings. The same procedure will be carried out with 10 and 15 cmH2O of PEEP. Inspiratory pressure will be kept constant throughout the protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated using an endotracheal tube admitted to Anchorena San Martin intensive care unit who are ventilated in pressure support ventilation.
You may qualify if:
- Need of invasive mechanical ventilation
- Patients who had fulfill ARDS criteria based on Berlin definition during any time of invasive mechanical ventilation.
- Patient ventilated in pressure support ventilation.
- Time of invasive ventilation expected to be longer than 24 hs after the day of enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Neuromuscular diseases (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Duchenne Erb)
- previous diagnosis of chronic obstructed pulmonary disease
- not resolved pneumothorax
- bronchopleural fistula
- suspicion of central respiratory drive alteration (e.g., benzodiazepines intoxication).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sanatorio Anchorena de San Martin
San Martín, Buenos Aires, B1650CQU, Argentina
Related Publications (10)
Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, Ferguson ND, Penuelas O, Abraira V, Raymondos K, Rios F, Nin N, Apezteguia C, Violi DA, Thille AW, Brochard L, Gonzalez M, Villagomez AJ, Hurtado J, Davies AR, Du B, Maggiore SM, Pelosi P, Soto L, Tomicic V, D'Empaire G, Matamis D, Abroug F, Moreno RP, Soares MA, Arabi Y, Sandi F, Jibaja M, Amin P, Koh Y, Kuiper MA, Bulow HH, Zeggwagh AA, Anzueto A. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):220-30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC.
PMID: 23631814BACKGROUNDDAS-Taskforce 2015; Baron R, Binder A, Biniek R, Braune S, Buerkle H, Dall P, Demirakca S, Eckardt R, Eggers V, Eichler I, Fietze I, Freys S, Frund A, Garten L, Gohrbandt B, Harth I, Hartl W, Heppner HJ, Horter J, Huth R, Janssens U, Jungk C, Kaeuper KM, Kessler P, Kleinschmidt S, Kochanek M, Kumpf M, Meiser A, Mueller A, Orth M, Putensen C, Roth B, Schaefer M, Schaefers R, Schellongowski P, Schindler M, Schmitt R, Scholz J, Schroeder S, Schwarzmann G, Spies C, Stingele R, Tonner P, Trieschmann U, Tryba M, Wappler F, Waydhas C, Weiss B, Weisshaar G. Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) - short version. Ger Med Sci. 2015 Nov 12;13:Doc19. doi: 10.3205/000223. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26609286BACKGROUNDSchepens T, Dres M, Heunks L, Goligher EC. Diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Feb;25(1):77-85. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000578.
PMID: 30531536BACKGROUNDMauri T, Cambiaghi B, Spinelli E, Langer T, Grasselli G. Spontaneous breathing: a double-edged sword to handle with care. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):292. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.55.
PMID: 28828367BACKGROUNDGoligher EC, Fan E, Herridge MS, Murray A, Vorona S, Brace D, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Tomlinson G, Singh JM, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Brochard LJ, Ferguson ND. Evolution of Diaphragm Thickness during Mechanical Ventilation. Impact of Inspiratory Effort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1080-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0620OC.
PMID: 26167730BACKGROUNDTelias I, Brochard L, Goligher EC. Is my patient's respiratory drive (too) high? Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1936-1939. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5091-2. Epub 2018 Mar 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 29497778BACKGROUNDBrochard L, Slutsky A, Pesenti A. Mechanical Ventilation to Minimize Progression of Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP.
PMID: 27626833BACKGROUNDMorais CCA, Koyama Y, Yoshida T, Plens GM, Gomes S, Lima CAS, Ramos OPS, Pereira SM, Kawaguchi N, Yamamoto H, Uchiyama A, Borges JB, Vidal Melo MF, Tucci MR, Amato MBP, Kavanagh BP, Costa ELV, Fujino Y. High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Renders Spontaneous Effort Noninjurious. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 May 15;197(10):1285-1296. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1244OC.
PMID: 29323536BACKGROUNDYoshida T, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Fujino Y. Spontaneous breathing during lung-protective ventilation in an experimental acute lung injury model: high transpulmonary pressure associated with strong spontaneous breathing effort may worsen lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 May;40(5):1578-85. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182451c40.
PMID: 22430241BACKGROUNDMauri T, Bellani G, Confalonieri A, Tagliabue P, Turella M, Coppadoro A, Citerio G, Patroniti N, Pesenti A. Topographic distribution of tidal ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and pressure support. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1664-73. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287f6e7.
PMID: 23507723BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of physica therapy department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2020
First Posted
August 24, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04