NCT04512521

Brief Summary

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma will be placed on biologics if they continue to be uncontrolled despite maximized inhalation therapy or if they are only controlled under oral corticosteroids. Among biologics, 80% of patients respond to treatment and improve clinically, but approximately 20% are non-responders and up to date no established predictive factors for treatment response exist. Among the responders, about 30% respond very well (so-called super responders), the rest shows moderate improvements. As the lung function, one main criterion to evaluate treatment response improves in most patients with delay, the response (or non-response) to treatment can only be reliably estimated after 4 to 12 months. This can lead to prolonged use of medication in non-responders (overtreatment) on one hand and to unjustified and premature termination of therapy (undertreatment) on the other hand (GINA report 2019). Functional lung MRI has the potential to show early changes in lung microstructure, regional ventilation and perfusion and thus has the potential for early detection of therapy response. Very promising results of dynamic regional ventilation and perfusion mapping using phase resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI have been shown recently. However, if functional lung MRI can reliably detect treatment effects under Mepolizumab therapy and can help to predict a long-term patient outcome is still unknown. As these findings could directly influence clinical decision making this question is of high clinical relevance.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2020

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 4, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 29, 2020

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2020

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

July 29, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Baseline ventilation-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI

    Baseline airway function by measuring ventilation-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI.

    baseline

  • Ventilation-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI after 3 months treatment with Mepolizumab

    To study the effect of Mepolizumab treatment after 3 months treatment compared to baseline on airway function by measuring ventilation-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI.

    3 months

  • Baseline perfusion-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI

    Baseline vascular function by measuring pulmonary perfusion-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI

    baseline

  • Perfusion-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI after 3 months treatment with Mepolizumab

    To study the effect of Mepolizumab treatment after 3 months treatment compared to baseline on vascular function by measuring pulmonary perfusion-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI

    3 months

  • Baseline ventilation/Perfusion mismatch by pulmonary MRI

    Baseline Ventilation/Perfusion match and mismatch measured by pulmonary MRI.

    baseline

  • Ventilation/Perfusion mismatch by pulmonary MRI after 3 months treatment with Mepolizumab

    To study the effect of Mepolizumab treatment after 3 months treatment compared to baseline as Ventilation/Perfusion match and mismatch measured by pulmonary MRI.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Ventilation-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI after 6 weeks treatment with Mepolizumab

    6 weeks

  • Perfusion-defect percentage by pulmonary MRI after 6 weeks treatment with Mepolizumab

    6 weeks

  • Ventilation/Perfusion mismatch by pulmonary MRI after 6 weeks treatment with Mepolizumab

    6 weeks

  • Baseline asthma control test

    baseline

  • Asthma control test after 12 months of treatment with Mepolizumab

    12 months

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

eosinophilic asthma

Drug: Mepolizumab

Interventions

Mepolizumab therapy

eosinophilic asthma

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The patients will be selected for this study consecutively by Dr. Suhling (or colleagues; Dr. Drick) from his Asthma outpatient clinic according to his clinical judgement.

You may qualify if:

  • Able and willing to give written informed consent.
  • Male and female subjects, aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients which are eligible for treatment using anti-IL-5 -antibody treatment following guidelines: severe eosinophilic asthma and blood eosinophils of ≥150 cells/μL at screening or ≥ 300 cells/μL within 12 months prior to treatment
  • Physician-diagnosed severe asthma according to ERS/ATS guidelines
  • Treatment with a total daily dose of medium or high-dose ICS (e.g. ≥ 500μg fluticasone propionate, ≥ 800μg budesonide or equivalent total daily dose). ICS can be contained within an ICS/LABA combination product.
  • At least one additional maintenance asthma controller e.g. LABA, LTRA, theophylline, LAMA, etc. with or without OCS

You may not qualify if:

  • Any clinically relevant abnormal findings in physical examination, clinical chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, vital signs, lung function at screening visit, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study or may influence the results of the study, or the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Past or present disease, which as judged by the investigator, may affect the outcome of this study. These diseases include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, hepatic disease, renal disease, hematological disease, neurological disease, endocrine disease or pulmonary disease other than Asthma (including but not confined to tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease or lung fibrosis).
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Risk of non-compliance with study procedures.
  • Suspected inability to understand the protocol requirements, instructions and study-related restrictions, the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.
  • History of an acute respiratory infection four weeks prior to enrolment. These patients will not be eligible, but will be permitted to be rescreened 4 weeks after the resolution of the respiratory tract infection.
  • Subjects with severe renal impairment (GFR ≤ 30 mL/min) including those with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or urinary retention.
  • Subjects with active/ clinical history of COPD.
  • Subjects unable to undergo MRI scans, including claustrophobia or presence of any metal objects within the patient, preventing from MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker, aneurysm clips).
  • History of asthma exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) or hospitalization within 3 months prior to enrolment.
  • Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 35 kg/m2.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hannover Medical School

Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (25)

  • To T, Stanojevic S, Moores G, Gershon AS, Bateman ED, Cruz AA, Boulet LP. Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 19;12:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-204.

    PMID: 22429515BACKGROUND
  • Hekking PW, Wener RR, Amelink M, Zwinderman AH, Bouvy ML, Bel EH. The prevalence of severe refractory asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Apr;135(4):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

    PMID: 25441637BACKGROUND
  • Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, Bush A, Castro M, Sterk PJ, Adcock IM, Bateman ED, Bel EH, Bleecker ER, Boulet LP, Brightling C, Chanez P, Dahlen SE, Djukanovic R, Frey U, Gaga M, Gibson P, Hamid Q, Jajour NN, Mauad T, Sorkness RL, Teague WG. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014 Feb;43(2):343-73. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00202013. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

    PMID: 24337046BACKGROUND
  • Braman SS. The global burden of asthma. Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1 Suppl):4S-12S. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1_suppl.4S.

    PMID: 16840363BACKGROUND
  • Pavord ID, Korn S, Howarth P, Bleecker ER, Buhl R, Keene ON, Ortega H, Chanez P. Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Aug 18;380(9842):651-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60988-X.

    PMID: 22901886BACKGROUND
  • Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx150017. Epub 2015 Apr 10. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25860645BACKGROUND
  • Bel EH, Wenzel SE, Thompson PJ, Prazma CM, Keene ON, Yancey SW, Ortega HG, Pavord ID; SIRIUS Investigators. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in eosinophilic asthma. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1189-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403291. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

    PMID: 25199060BACKGROUND
  • Castro M, Zangrilli J, Wechsler ME, Bateman ED, Brusselle GG, Bardin P, Murphy K, Maspero JF, O'Brien C, Korn S. Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

    PMID: 25736990BACKGROUND
  • Nair P, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, Bourdin A, Lugogo NL, Kuna P, Barker P, Sproule S, Ponnarambil S, Goldman M; ZONDA Trial Investigators. Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Benralizumab in Severe Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2448-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703501. Epub 2017 May 22.

    PMID: 28530840BACKGROUND
  • Voskrebenzev A, Gutberlet M, Klimes F, Kaireit TF, Schonfeld C, Rotarmel A, Wacker F, Vogel-Claussen J. Feasibility of quantitative regional ventilation and perfusion mapping with phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI in healthy volunteers and COPD, CTEPH, and CF patients. Magn Reson Med. 2018 Apr;79(4):2306-2314. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26893. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

    PMID: 28856715BACKGROUND
  • Kaireit TF, Gutberlet M, Voskrebenzev A, Freise J, Welte T, Hohlfeld JM, Wacker F, Vogel-Claussen J. Comparison of quantitative regional ventilation-weighted fourier decomposition MRI with dynamic fluorinated gas washout MRI and lung function testing in COPD patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jun;47(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25902. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

    PMID: 29160020BACKGROUND
  • Kaireit TF, Voskrebenzev A, Gutberlet M, Freise J, Jobst B, Kauczor HU, Welte T, Wacker F, Vogel-Claussen J. Comparison of quantitative regional perfusion-weighted phase resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced regional pulmonary perfusion MRI in COPD patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr;49(4):1122-1132. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26342. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

    PMID: 30350440BACKGROUND
  • Klimes F, Voskrebenzev A, Gutberlet M, Kern A, Behrendt L, Kaireit TF, Czerner C, Renne J, Wacker F, Vogel-Claussen J. Free-breathing quantification of regional ventilation derived by phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI. NMR Biomed. 2019 Jun;32(6):e4088. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4088. Epub 2019 Mar 25.

    PMID: 30908743BACKGROUND
  • Bauman G, Puderbach M, Deimling M, Jellus V, Chefd'hotel C, Dinkel J, Hintze C, Kauczor HU, Schad LR. Non-contrast-enhanced perfusion and ventilation assessment of the human lung by means of fourier decomposition in proton MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Sep;62(3):656-64. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22031.

    PMID: 19585597BACKGROUND
  • Moher Alsady T, Voskrebenzev A, Greer M, Becker L, Kaireit TF, Welte T, Wacker F, Gottlieb J, Vogel-Claussen J. MRI-derived regional flow-volume loop parameters detect early-stage chronic lung allograft dysfunction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1873-1882. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26799. Epub 2019 May 27.

    PMID: 31134705BACKGROUND
  • Svenningsen S, Eddy RL, Lim HF, Cox PG, Nair P, Parraga G. Sputum Eosinophilia and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ventilation Heterogeneity in Severe Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 1;197(7):876-884. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1948OC.

    PMID: 29313707BACKGROUND
  • Gutberlet M, Kaireit TF, Voskrebenzev A, Lasch F, Freise J, Welte T, Wacker F, Hohlfeld JM, Vogel-Claussen J. Free-breathing Dynamic 19F Gas MR Imaging for Mapping of Regional Lung Ventilation in Patients with COPD. Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):1040-1051. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170591. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

    PMID: 28972817BACKGROUND
  • Couch MJ, Ball IK, Li T, Fox MS, Biman B, Albert MS. 19 F MRI of the Lungs Using Inert Fluorinated Gases: Challenges and New Developments. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):343-354. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26292. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

    PMID: 30248212BACKGROUND
  • Horn FC, Marshall H, Collier GJ, Kay R, Siddiqui S, Brightling CE, Parra-Robles J, Wild JM. Regional Ventilation Changes in the Lung: Treatment Response Mapping by Using Hyperpolarized Gas MR Imaging as a Quantitative Biomarker. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):854-861. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017160532. Epub 2017 May 4.

    PMID: 28471738BACKGROUND
  • Capaldi DPI, Sheikh K, Eddy RL, Guo F, Svenningsen S, Nair P, McCormack DG, Parraga G; Canadian Respiratory Research Network. Free-breathing Functional Pulmonary MRI: Response to Bronchodilator and Bronchoprovocation in Severe Asthma. Acad Radiol. 2017 Oct;24(10):1268-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 May 24.

    PMID: 28551402BACKGROUND
  • Svenningsen S, Kirby M, Starr D, Leary D, Wheatley A, Maksym GN, McCormack DG, Parraga G. Hyperpolarized (3) He and (129) Xe MRI: differences in asthma before bronchodilation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Dec;38(6):1521-30. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24111. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

    PMID: 23589465BACKGROUND
  • Vogel-Claussen J, Schonfeld CO, Kaireit TF, Voskrebenzev A, Czerner CP, Renne J, Tillmann HC, Berschneider K, Hiltl S, Bauersachs J, Welte T, Hohlfeld JM. Effect of Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium on Pulmonary Perfusion and Ventilation in Hyperinflated Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CLAIM). A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 May 1;199(9):1086-1096. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201805-0995OC.

    PMID: 30641027BACKGROUND
  • Hueper K, Parikh MA, Prince MR, Schoenfeld C, Liu C, Bluemke DA, Dashnaw SM, Goldstein TA, Hoffman EA, Lima JA, Skrok J, Zheng J, Barr RG, Vogel-Claussen J. Quantitative and semiquantitative measures of regional pulmonary microvascular perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging and their relationships to global lung perfusion and lung diffusing capacity: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study. Invest Radiol. 2013 Apr;48(4):223-30. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318281057d.

    PMID: 23385398BACKGROUND
  • Eddy RL, Svenningsen S, McCormack DG, Parraga G. What is the minimal clinically important difference for helium-3 magnetic resonance imaging ventilation defects? Eur Respir J. 2018 Jun 28;51(6):1800324. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00324-2018. Print 2018 Jun. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29650564BACKGROUND
  • Drick N, Seeliger B, Welte T, Fuge J, Suhling H. Anti-IL-5 therapy in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma - clinical efficacy and possible criteria for treatment response. BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0689-2.

    PMID: 30021546BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

blood eosinophil cell count, IgE FENO capillary BGA

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Eosinophilia

Interventions

mepolizumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesHypereosinophilic SyndromeEosinophiliaLeukocyte DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jens Vogel-Claussen, MD

    Hannover Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2020

First Posted

August 13, 2020

Study Start

May 4, 2020

Primary Completion

February 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 1, 2025

Last Updated

March 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations