Lundbeck TOMs Orthostatic Hypotension
Technology-Based Objective Measures for Gait and Postural Assessment in Parkinson Disease Patients With Orthostatic Hypotension: Feasibility and Effect-Size Finding Study
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthostatic hypotension (OH), which consists in a significant reduction in blood pressure levels upon standing from a seated position, may affect approximately one in three patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). It usually presents as dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling faint, or feeling like you might black out while standing. This can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of PD patients, resulting in difficulties with balance, walking, and increased risk of falls. The main aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of technological devices (a computerized system for analyzing abnormalities in walking in clinical settings and a wearable sensor to detect changes in postural unsteadiness in the home environment) may improve the detection of complications and the response to medical therapies for OH in patients with PD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 26, 2022
CompletedSeptember 26, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.9 years
July 9, 2020
March 16, 2022
August 30, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) Score
Orthostatic Hypotension Symptom Assessment (OHSA; Range: 0-10) and Orthostatic Hypotension Daily Activities Scale (OHDAS; Range: 0-10) 10 items measured on a Likert-scale with 10 being the worst possible score.
1 month
Tinetti Score
he Tinetti assessment tool is an easily administered task-oriented test that measures an older adult's gait and balance abilities. Scoring: Items are scored either "0-1" or "0-2". "0" indicates the highest level of impairment, whereas a higher score (1 or 2) indicates the individuals independence. There were 17 tasks (one task split into two sub-items and scored twice) that the scores were summed for a highest possible score of 28 (10 items scored on a 0-1 scale, and 8 items scored on a 0-2 scale). The Tinetti assessment was compared pre- and post- 6 week medication dosing.
6 weeks
PDQ-39 Score
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living including mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. The scale consists of 39 items ranked on a 5-point ordinal scale (Never=0, Occasionally=1, Sometimes=2, Often=3, Always=4). Each dimension total score range from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better Quality of Life. Dimension score = sum of scores of each item in the dimension divided by the maximum possible score of all the items in the dimension, multiplied by 100. Overall score = sum of dimension total scores divided by 8. Scores were compared pre- and post- 6 weeks dosing with medication.
6 weeks
Gait Analysis - Stride Length
Measured in cm
1 month
Gait Analysis - Single Leg Stance Time
Using a gait mat, participants were instructed to walk self-paced along the mat. The sensors in the mat automatically extracted the percentage of time a participant stood on a single leg. The output was compared pre- and post- 6 week dosing with study medication.
6 weeks
Gait Analysis - Gait Velocity
Using a gait mat, participants were instructed to walk self-paced on the mat, turn around, and walk back. Their velocity was measured in cm/sec. This output was compared pre- and post- 6 week dosing with study medication.
6 weeks
Postural Analysis - Postural Sway
Using a gait mat, postural sway was measured in cm on the X-axis while participants were asked to stand eyes open and eyes closed for 30 seconds. This output was compared pre- and post- 6 weeks dosing with study medication.
6 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Droxidopa
EXPERIMENTAL100-600mg droxidopa TID
Interventions
droxidopa taken three times a day titrated up to a maximum of 600 mg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, meeting UK Brain Bank criteria for at least 3 years
- Hoehn and Yahr (H\&Y) stage I-III
- Age between 30 and 80 years old (both inclusive)
- Stable dosage of dopaminergic medications for at least 4 weeks
- Orthostatic Hypotension, defined as a fall in systolic BP ≥ 20 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 10 mmHg within 3 minutes of standing
- Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes mellitus or other diseases potentially associated with autonomic dysfunction
- Treatment with antihypertensive drugs or with alpha-adrenergic antagonists
- Cognitive impairment, defined as a score \< 24 at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- Any atypical signs lowering the diagnostic certainty for PD
- Lack of postural reflex defined as a score \> 2 at the MDS-UPDRS item 3.12 (recover at the pull test)
- Severe levodopa induced dyskinesia, defined as an MDS-UPDRS item 4.2 \> 2 (functional impact of dyskinesia)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Alberto Espay, MD, MSclead
- Lundbeck LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Related Publications (21)
Velseboer DC, de Haan RJ, Wieling W, Goldstein DS, de Bie RM. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011 Dec;17(10):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 May 14.
PMID: 21571570BACKGROUNDPalma JA, Gomez-Esteban JC, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Martinez J, Tijero B, Berganzo K, Kaufmann H. Orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson disease: how much you fall or how low you go? Mov Disord. 2015 Apr 15;30(5):639-45. doi: 10.1002/mds.26079. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
PMID: 25678194BACKGROUNDSenard JM, Rai S, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Brefel C, Rascol O, Rascol A, Montastruc JL. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;63(5):584-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.63.5.584.
PMID: 9408097BACKGROUNDTan LC, Tan AK, Tjia HT. The profile of hospitalised patients with Parkinson's disease. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998 Nov;27(6):808-12.
PMID: 10101555BACKGROUNDWoodford H, Walker R. Emergency hospital admissions in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2005 Sep;20(9):1104-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.20485.
PMID: 15884038BACKGROUNDVossius C, Nilsen OB, Larsen JP. Parkinson's disease and hospital admissions: frequencies, diagnoses and costs. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010 Jan;121(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01239.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
PMID: 19744137BACKGROUNDKaufmann H, Malamut R, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Rosa K, Freeman R. The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ): validation of a novel symptom assessment scale. Clin Auton Res. 2012 Apr;22(2):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s10286-011-0146-2. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
PMID: 22045363BACKGROUNDMerola A, Romagnolo A, Rosso M, Lopez-Castellanos JR, Wissel BD, Larkin S, Bernardini A, Zibetti M, Maule S, Lopiano L, Espay AJ. Orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease: Does it matter if asymptomatic? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Dec;33:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
PMID: 27641792BACKGROUNDHubble RP, Naughton GA, Silburn PA, Cole MH. Wearable sensor use for assessing standing balance and walking stability in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0123705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123705. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25894561BACKGROUNDTinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 3944402BACKGROUNDJenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing. 1997 Sep;26(5):353-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.5.353.
PMID: 9351479BACKGROUNDRobbins TW, James M, Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, McInnes L, Rabbitt P. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994 Sep-Oct;5(5):266-81. doi: 10.1159/000106735.
PMID: 7951684BACKGROUNDKarrasch M, Laatu S, Martikainen K, Marttila R. CERAD test performance and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Dec;128(6):409-13. doi: 10.1111/ane.12138. Epub 2013 May 14.
PMID: 23668316BACKGROUNDEspay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB, Maetzler W, Dean JM, Klucken J, Eskofier BM, Merola A, Horak F, Lang AE, Reilmann R, Giuffrida J, Nieuwboer A, Horne M, Little MA, Litvan I, Simuni T, Dorsey ER, Burack MA, Kubota K, Kamondi A, Godinho C, Daneault JF, Mitsi G, Krinke L, Hausdorff JM, Bloem BR, Papapetropoulos S; Movement Disorders Society Task Force on Technology. Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;31(9):1272-82. doi: 10.1002/mds.26642. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PMID: 27125836BACKGROUNDGibb WR, Lees AJ. The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jun;51(6):745-52. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745.
PMID: 2841426BACKGROUNDLahrmann H, Cortelli P, Hilz M, Mathias CJ, Struhal W, Tassinari M. EFNS guidelines on the diagnosis and management of orthostatic hypotension. Eur J Neurol. 2006 Sep;13(9):930-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01512.x.
PMID: 16930356BACKGROUNDDineen J, Freeman R. Autonomic Neuropathy. Semin Neurol. 2015 Aug;35(4):458-68. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558983. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
PMID: 26502768BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUNDJordan J, Biaggioni I. Diagnosis and treatment of supine hypertension in autonomic failure patients with orthostatic hypotension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Mar-Apr;4(2):139-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00516.x.
PMID: 11927799BACKGROUNDGoetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340.
PMID: 19025984BACKGROUNDO'Sullivan JD, Said CM, Dillon LC, Hoffman M, Hughes AJ. Gait analysis in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations: influence of levodopa and comparison with other measures of motor function. Mov Disord. 1998 Nov;13(6):900-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130607.
PMID: 9827613BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Alberto Espay, MD, MSc
- Organization
- University of Cincinnati
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Neurology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2020
First Posted
August 12, 2020
Study Start
February 11, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 26, 2022
Results First Posted
September 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share