Peer-mentor Support for Older Vulnerable Myocardial Infarction Patients
'HjertensGlad'.Inequality in Cardiac Rehabilitation Attendance: Peer-mentors as a Feasible Solution
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: Advanced treatment regimens have reduced cardiovascular mortality resulting in an increasingly older myocardial infarction (MI) population in need of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) , the majority (74%) is above 60 years. The positive effect of CR is well established; CR reduces cardiovascular mortality, lowers hospital admissions, and improves quality of life among patients with ischemic heart disease. These positive effects of CR has also been established among older patients. The inherent problem lies in the low attendance rate, often below 50%. Several studies, including studies from Denmark, have shown that low participation in CR is most prevalent among older, vulnerable female patients. The notion vulnerable covers patients with low socioeconomic position (SEP), patients with non-western background and patients living alone, as these groups have particularly low CR attendance. Effective interventions aiming at increasing CR attendance among these low attending groups are thus warranted and the current study will seek to address this. AIM: To test feasibility and acceptability of methods used in a peer-mentor intervention among older female and vulnerable post MI patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study is designed as a one arm feasibility study. Patients (n=20) are recruited by a dedicated research nurse before discharge from the cardiology department at Nordsjællands Hospital. Data is collected at three timepoints, baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The patients (mentees) are matched with peer-mentors. Peer-mentoring (i.e. mentoring by a person with a similar life situation or health problem as one self) is a low-cost intervention that holds the potential to improve CR attendance and improve physical and psychological outcomes among older patients. Peer-mentors are role models who can guide and support patients overcoming barriers of CR attendance. Peer-mentoring is unexplored in a CR setting among older, female and vulnerable MI patients; establishing the novelty of the current study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 21, 2021
CompletedJune 24, 2021
June 1, 2021
10 months
August 5, 2020
June 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Recruitment
Number of patients included from eligible patients
Baseline
Dropout
Number of patients not completing the intervention
24 weeks
Satisfaction with intervention
Semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients
12 weeks
Number of contacts
Number of contacts between patient and peer-mentor
24 weeks
Content of contacts
Content of contacts between patient and peer-mentor will be assessed through open ended question on questionnaire i.e. 'What was the content of your meeting? e.g face-to-face meeting with conversation about everyday life'
24 weeks
CR attendance
Measured as 'self-reported CR attendance'
12 weeks
CR attendance
Measured as 'self-reported CR attendance'
24 weeks
Change in Health-related Quality of Life
Measured using the 'HeartQoL' 'Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire'. Min. score: 0, max score: 42. Higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Change in Self-efficacy
Measured using the questionnaire 'General self-efficacy scale'. Min score: 10, max score: 40. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Baseline to 24 weeks
Change in symptoms of anxiety and depression
Measured using the questionnaire 'The hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). Min. score: 0, max score 42. Lower scores indicating a better outcome
Baseline to 24 weeks
Change in dietary quality
Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Baseline to 24 weeks
Change in physical activity
Measured using the questionnaire 'Heartdiet'. Higher scores indicating a better outcome
Baseline to 24 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Peer-mentoring
EXPERIMENTALPeer-mentoring
Interventions
Patients (mentees) are matched with a peer-mentor. Throughout the intervention period (24 weeks), the mentee and the mentor will have informal telephone contact and meet face-to face approximately 8 times during the intervention period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥65 years and diagnosed with MI and referred to CR and female or low SEP or single living or non-western background.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to provide written consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University College Copenhagenlead
- Velux Fondencollaborator
- Danish Nurses Organisationcollaborator
- Nordsjaellands Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Nordsjællands Hospital - Frederikssund
Frederikssund, 3600, Denmark
Nordsjællands Hospital - Hillerød
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Pedersen M, Bennich B, Boateng T, Beck AM, Sibilitz K, Andersen I, Overgaard D. Peer-mentor support for older vulnerable myocardial infarction patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation: single-arm feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 9;8(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01141-w.
PMID: 35945611DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria K Pedersen, Ph.d.
University College Copenhagen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2020
First Posted
August 11, 2020
Study Start
September 7, 2020
Primary Completion
June 21, 2021
Study Completion
June 21, 2021
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share