Kenya: The Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Ellavi UBT for Postpartum Hemorrhage
Kenya: An Implementation Study on the Barriers and Facilitators of Scaling up the Innovative, Low-cost Ellavi Uterine Balloon Tamponade for Postpartum Hemorrhage
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this implementation research study is to generate evidence that informs the successful uptake and adoption of the Ellavi Uterine Balloon Tamponade (UBT) within Kenyan postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) management programs. The investigators aim to improve the likelihood that the Ellavi UBT will be integrated into the Kenyan health care system by obtaining critical feedback from stakeholders and health care providers on the barriers and facilitators towards its successful adoption and roll out. The research will be done in three purposively selected University of Nairobi affiliated hospitals in Nairobi county, Kenya. This study will therefore be exploratory and use a non-experimental design. The study team will train all obstetric healthcare staff (i.e. obstetricians, midwives, medical officers, clinical officers) involved in PPH management at the participating healthcare facilities on use of the Ellavi UBT. The investigators will then gather feedback from the obstetric healthcare workers (post-training and post-PPH) to understand the barriers to and facilitators of use in order to evaluate acceptability and feasibility among facilities providing different levels of care (level 4, level 5 (county), level 6 (tertiary)). This process will help to generate training and facility level recommendations for improved uptake and integration into the local maternal care package. Case report forms and semi-quantitative surveys will be completed by obstetrical care providers to evaluate the primary outcomes of acceptability and feasibility by measuring: context of use, accuracy of use, perceptions of the device, user confidence, acceptability, usability, facilitators of use, barriers to use, use-patterns, and insights into training effectiveness. The secondary outcomes will include financial data to determine the cost of introducing the Ellavi UBT into the Kenyan PPH management protocols and the health system. The study will not involve the storage of biological samples. There is not a direct benefit of the study to the individual participants. All study participants will sign consent forms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedApril 22, 2022
April 1, 2022
10 months
June 11, 2020
April 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Determine the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of using the Ellavi UBT via semi-quantitative surveys (quantitative and qualitative measures) with health care providers in Nairobi County.
Determine feasibility by measuring: 1) user comprehension of the Ellavi UBT usage steps and accuracy of use by evaluating assembly, timing of use, relevance for patient's health status (semi-quantitative measures), 2) facilitators of use and barriers to use (open ended, qualitative questions on facility placement, leadership influence, procurement channels, patient feedback), and 3) insights into training effectiveness (opened ended qualitative questions on preferred methods of training, quality of teaching provided). These outcome measures will be evaluated using both quantitative (multiple choice, likert scale) and qualitative (open ended explanations) responses. Determine acceptability by measuring: perceptions of the device (likert scale), attitudes towards the device (likert scale), user confidence (likert scale), and usability (likert scale). Determine appropriateness by measuring: patterns of use with open ended qualitative questions.
6 months
Determine the adoption, penetration, sustainability and fidelity of implementing the Ellavi UBT by examining hospital record books and collecting quantitative data.
Determine the adoption, penetration, sustainability and fidelity of implementing the Ellavi UBT device into PPH care at 3 health care facilities using semi-quantitative surveys and hospital level record books. Determine penetration: # facilities participating, # health workers trained, % of all health workers trained at each site. Determine adoption: % of facilities that adopted UBT devices, # of trained health workers who used the UBT. Determine sustainability: proportion of facilities and health worker who use UBTs/month, for 6 months; %l of providers that use the UBT correctly for \>80% of cases. Determine fidelity: % of all health workers surveyed that used the Ellavi UBT.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Determine the cost of introducing the Ellavi UBT into the PPH management protocol and health system by examining cost data, hospital procurement records, and quantifying labor hours worked.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Training
Study participants trained on how to use the Ellavi intra-uterine balloon tamponade via virtual webinar training. Feedback on training course elements will be obtained for future improvements prior to scaling.
Managing PPH
Study participants who provided refractory PPH care using an Ellavi UBT device will give feedback on the barriers and facilitators to use of the newly registered, low-cost medical device.
Interventions
The study team will train all obstetric healthcare staff (i.e. obstetricians, midwives, medical officers, clinical officers) involved in PPH management at the participating healthcare facilities on use of the Ellavi UBT. This will be done to gather feedback from the healthcare workers (post-training and post-PPH) to understand the barriers to and facilitators of use in order to evaluate acceptability and feasibility among facilities providing different levels of care (level 4, level 5 (county), level 6 (tertiary)).
Eligibility Criteria
Obstetrical care providers who recently participated in a training (before using the Ellavi UBT device for case management) and/or obstetrical care providers who recently managed a refractory PPH event. The study participant must work in one of the three participating health care facilities. The number of interviewees per site will vary depending on the size of the facility and the number of refractory PPH events. Eligible participants will be selected based on their participation in a PPH/Ellavi UBT training session, or their management of a PPH event. The study participants will include obstetricians, midwives, medical officers and clinical officers currently practicing medicine at Kenyatta National Hospital, Mbagathi Hospital, or St. Mary's Mission Hospital. If a facility has only three obstetrical care providers, these people will be re-sampled for each refractory PPH event to understand their interactions with the Ellavi UBT each time.
You may qualify if:
- Obstetricians, medical officers, clinical officers, and midwives who recently participated in a PPH/Ellavi UBT training or managed a refractory PPH case (with or without the use of an Ellavi UBT (within the past 72 hours) at one of the 3 participating health care facilities.
- Hospital administrators, supply store managers and/or procurement staff
You may not qualify if:
- \- Obstetricians, medical officers, clinical officers, and midwives working at the facility who do not agree or consent to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- PATHlead
- Department for International Development, United Kingdomcollaborator
- University of Nairobicollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kenyatta National Hospital
Nairobi, Kenya
Related Publications (1)
Parker ME, Qureshi Z, Deganus S, Soki J, Cofie P, Dapaah P, Owusu R, Gwako G, Osoti A, Ogutu O, Opira J, Sunkwa-Mills G, Boamah M, Srofenyoh E, Aboagye P, Fofie C, Kaliti S, Morozoff C, Secor A, Metzler M, Abu-Haydar E. Introduction of the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade into the Kenyan and Ghanaian maternal healthcare package for improved postpartum haemorrhage management: an implementation research study. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 3;13(2):e066907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066907.
PMID: 36737079DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Megan Parker, PhD
PATH
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2020
First Posted
August 6, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The de-identified data will be shared with the funder in the form of a study report. If data are held on a public database (due to publication requirements), they will not be linked to the study participant and their identity would not be revealed.