Immediate Load in Dental Implants Using Conventional Drilling and Piezoelectric Osteotomy on Aesthetic Zone.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare the survival rate of the implants placed using the ultrasonic technique and placed using conventional drilling, with an immediate load on the aesthetic zone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 4, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.8 years
July 28, 2020
August 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Marginal Bone Loss
To compare MBL measured using radiographs.
1 month
Marginal Bone Loss
To compare MBL measured using radiographs.
3 months
Marginal Bone Loss
To compare MBL measured using radiographs.
6 months
Marginal Bone Loss
To compare MBL measured using radiographs.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Primary stability
Baseline
Secondary stability
3 months
Probing depth
3,6,12 months
Bleeding of probing
3,6,12 months
Survival rate
3,6,12 months
Study Arms (2)
Piezoelectric osteotomy
EXPERIMENTALImplant placement by piezoelectric osteotomy
Conventional drilling
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplant placement by conventional drilling
Interventions
Implants placed using the ultrasonic technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Absence of teeth on the aesthetic zone, whether its an incisor, canine or premolar.
- months after the dental extraction without alveolar scar tissue remains.
- Bone availability of at least 5mm of width and 13mm of length.
- At least 2 to 3 mm of soft tissue for the establishment of an adequate peri-implant biological width.
- Oclusal pattern that ensures prosthetic success.
- Implants need to have at least a 35 N and 70 ISQ index to be loaded.
- Index of plaque \< 20% and/or inactive periodontal disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute myocardial infarction in the last 2 months.
- Uncontrolled coagulation disorders
- Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c\> 7.5%).
- Radiotherapy on head/neck in the last 24 months.
- Immunocompromised patient.
- History of medication related to osteonecrosis of the jaws.
- Psychiatric disorders, alcohol, drugs and large smokers (\>10 cigarrillos).
- Plaque index \> 20%.
- Need for simultaneous or previous peri-implant guided bone regeneration procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Isabel Godoy Reina
Almería, 04001, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Master of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, PhD student.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2020
First Posted
August 4, 2020
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08