Comparative Aesthetic Analysis Between Titanium and Ceramic Implants
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare ceramic and titanium implants with respect to the esthetic and clinical parameters, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Material and methods: Thirty patients received thirty implants (8-12 mm in length, 3.3 mm diameter and a tissue level design) to replace the absence of a single tooth in the anterior maxilla. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a ceramic or a titanium implant. Esthetic and clinical parameters and PROMs were evaluated 18 months after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2021
CompletedDecember 27, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.8 years
January 10, 2021
December 23, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome was the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index (ICAI).
It consists of nine sections: (i) mesiodistal dimension of the crown, (ii) position of the incisal edge of the crown, (iii) labial convexity of the crown, (iv) color and translucency of the crown, (v) crown surface, (vi) position of the gingival margin of the peri-implant mucosa, (vii) position of the interdental papilla, (viii) contour of the vestibular mucosa and (ix) color and surface of the vestibular mucosa. These sections were compared with the adjacent and contralateral tooth as a reference and assigned the following score: 0, excellent; 1 or 2 satisfactory; 3 or 4 moderate; 5 or more bad (Meijer et al., 2005).
36 months
Study Arms (2)
CONTROL GROUP
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplant surgery placement. Tissue Level SLA Titanium implant (Straumann Standard Plus Narrow Neck CrossFit®; Institut Straumann, Basel, Switzerland). The implant had a diameter of 3.3 mm and a polished neck of 1.8 mm. The length of the implants was 8, 10 and 12 mm and was chosen according to the patient's anatomy.
TEST GROUP
EXPERIMENTALImplant surgery placement. Tissue Level Ceramic monotype implant was placed (Straumann PURE Ceramic implants®; Institut Straumann, Basel, Switzerland). The implant had a diameter of 3.3 mm and a polished neck of 1.8 mm. The length of the implants was 8, 10 and 12 mm and was chosen according to the patient's anatomy.
Interventions
Two types of implant placement and follow-up to compare the esthetic, clinical and radiographic parameters between them.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Periodontal and systemically healthy patients \> 18 years of age, with good plaque control (\< 25%).
- Patients with a missing tooth in the anterior maxilla (from 13 to 23) with the presence of adjacent natural dentition mesially and distally (single gap). A minimum of 4 months of healing after tooth extraction was required before implant insertion.
- Presence of ≥ 2mm of keratinized tissue.
- Simultaneous bone regeneration was allowed during surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Intake any medication or presence of any systemic disease that could affect bone metabolism.
- Pregnancy, or lactating women.
- Active periodontal disease
- Smoking \>10 cig/day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Master Periodoncia
Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Juan Blanco
University of Santiago de Compostela
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctorate in Dentistry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2021
First Posted
January 13, 2021
Study Start
September 15, 2015
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
March 30, 2020
Last Updated
December 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share