Quality Improvement Study on Operative Consent Forms
Delivering High Quality Documentation on Operative Consent Forms; A UK Major Trauma Centre Quality Improvement Study
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A Quality Improvement Project was undertaken to improve the completion of operative consent forms within a UK hospital plastic surgery department. Four weekly interventions were made which were accompanied by four further data collection cycles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 30, 2020
May 1, 2020
28 days
July 22, 2020
July 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Legibility of consent forms
Number of operative consent forms that are overall legible (rather than illegible) as assessed by 2 members of the quality improvement team. In cases of differing of opinion on legibility a third member the team to assess.
4 weeks
Full population of patient signature, writing of name and dating of operative consent form
Number of operative consent forms with full population of: patient signature + patient writing of name + patient dating of operative consent form
4 weeks
Omission of all abbreviations from written description of operation + risks of operation + benefits of operation on operative consent form
Number of operative consent forms with: omission of all abbreviations from written description of operation / risks of operation / benefits of operation fields on operative consent form
4 weeks
Interventions
All interventions directed to members of the plastic surgery department: Intervention 1: Poster illustration common mistakes on consent forms. Intervention 2: Group message explaining Quality Improvement Project to the department. Intervention 3: Email from Consultant lead in support of project. Intervention 4: Further group message illustrating gains and ongoing goals of the project.
Eligibility Criteria
The operative consent form of any adult or paediatric patient consented for an operative procedure within the Royal London Hospital Plastic surgery department within the time frame of the Quality Improvement Project.
You may qualify if:
- Operative Consent form 1 or Consent form 2 completed within the Royal London Hospital Plastic surgery department within one week of the previous intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- All other consent forms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
BartsLondonNHS
London, E1 1FR, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Gillon R. Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2015 Jan;41(1):111-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102282.
PMID: 25516950BACKGROUND
Related Links
- 1\. Wai Hung Yau et al. Clinical Negligence Costs: taking action to safeguard NHS sustainability. BMJ 2020; 368 doi
- 2\. House of Commons Committee of public accounts. Managing the costs of clinical negligence in hospital trusts. Fifth report of session 2017-2019. (accessed 4th July 2020)
- 2\. House of Commons Committee of public accounts. Managing the costs of clinical negligence in hospital trusts. Fifth report of session 2017-2019. (accessed 4th July 2020)
- 5\. Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines on Good Surgical Practice Sept 2014 section 3.5.1 'Consent'. (accessed 4th July 2020)
- 6\. Institute for Healthcare Improvement; Quality Improvement Essentials Toolkit. (accessed 4th July 2020)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Matthew Stodell, FRCS
Barts and the Royal London NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
January 6, 2020
Primary Completion
February 3, 2020
Study Completion
June 20, 2020
Last Updated
July 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
No sharing of participant data will take place.