Informed Consent and Clinical Trials
2 other identifiers
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To understand the patients' meaning of the informed consent process in clinical trials. Objective of the study is:
- to assess, in a cohort of subjects included in clinical trials, whether the information and the informed Consent Forms conveyed to the patients have been understood
- to assess whether the choice to participate in a clinical trial is informed and aware
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2012
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedMarch 3, 2015
March 1, 2015
5 months
June 26, 2012
March 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Therapeutic misconception cases among participants
The question N° 18 has 4 answers. The patients who will answer "yes, for sure" will be considered cases of "therapeutic misconception". The study is qualtative. The assessment needs a multidimensional evaluation through many primary outcomes.
From the 31st to the 40th day since the ICF signature of the clinical trial
Time required to release the informed consent signed
The question N. 7 wants to verify the time passed between the release of information by the investigator and the signature of the informed consent (Less than 1 hour, more than 1 hour, more than 1 day, more than 1 week).
From the 31st to the 40th day since the ICF signature of the clinical trial
Understanding of the possibilities / alternatives to experimental therapy
The questions N. 15 and N. 16 want to verify the awareness of possible alternatives to the experimental therapy.
From the 31st to the 40th day since the ICF signature of the clinical trial
Comprehension of the significance of the informed consent
The question N. 11 want to verify the patient's awareness about the significance of the informed consent.
From the 31st to the 40th day since the ICF signature of the clinical trial
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects or legal representatives (care givers, parents) who have signed the ICF during the last 30 days for participation in an interventional clinical trial
You may qualify if:
- subjects or legal representatives (care givers, parents) who have signed the IC during the last 30 days for participation in an interventional clinical trial
- release an authorization to be contacted by the Ethics Committee of AUSL Bologna.
- able to read Italian
You may not qualify if:
- subjects enrolled in observations studies
- not release of authorization to be contacted by the Ethics Committee
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ethics Commitee AUSL of Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, 40100, Italy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paola Mosconi, Biology
Ethics Committee AUSL of Bologna
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2012
First Posted
July 10, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03