NCT04492007

Brief Summary

This is a proof-of-concept pilot randomized clinical trial to test the feasibility of the innovative Patient-Reported Outcomes-Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) to enhance personalized supportive care for cancer patients and caregivers during post-treatment care transition.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 30, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 2, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 21, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 3, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

June 24, 2020

Results QC Date

June 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ostomy (colostomy, urostomy, and ileostomy)symptomself-managementcaregivingfamily researchtelehealthself-efficacyquality of lifepost-treatment care transition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Enrollment Number

    The enrollment rate is defined as the number of potentially eligible couples (dyads) who have consented to participate in the study. 1 Dyad = 1 participant + their caregiver. Potentially eligible dyads (subjects and their caregivers) were approached and informed about the study. then the number of dyads who consented and completed.

    Baseline

  • Number of Potentially Eligible Dyads Participants Actually Enrolled in the Study

    Potentially Eligible Dyads Participants Actually Enrolled in the Study will be evaluated by the number of dyads who successfully consented and completed the baseline survey among all people approached for the study. 1 Dyad = 1 participant + their caregiver.

    Baseline, after consent

  • Number of Dyads Remained in the Study and Completed the Post-Intervention Follow-Up Survey.

    The number of dyad Participants Enrolled who Remained in the Study and Completed the Post-Intervention Follow-Up Survey was assessed by the number of enrolled dyad participants who completed the 2-month follow-up survey at the end of the study period.

    Up to 3 months (2-month follow up survey)

  • Usability of Reported Outcomes - Patient Reported Outcomes - Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS)

    Usability of Reported Outcomes - Patient Reported Outcomes - Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) evaluates three aspects: General, content, and navigation, contains 19 items on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree". The score for each aspect was calculated as the sum of the scores from all items in this aspect. The scores ranged between 5 and 25 for General and Content, and the Navigation score ranged between 9 and 45. The higher score of the specific aspect that patients and their caregivers reported indicates the better usability of the aspect. This survey was offered separately at the follow-up visit to patients and their caregivers. Participants who completed at least 80.00% of the questions were included in the analysis. Usual Care and Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) group scores were compared.

    Up to 2 months (Follow up survey)

  • Satisfaction With the PRISMS Program

    The satisfaction survey evaluates satisfaction with various aspects, contains 9 items on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5, and higher scores reflect better satisfaction. Questions: Q1. The amount of time to review the program every time. Q2. Ease of navigating. Q3. Information I received. Q4. Quality of the information I received. Q5. The program has increased my knowledge about managing my symptoms and complications. Q6. The program has improved how I manage my symptoms and complications. Q7. The program has improved how I communicate with my family about sensitive topics related to my cancer care. Q8. The time and effort took me to complete. Q9. My knowledge about how my cancer has affected my partner and our relationship was improved. This survey was offered at the follow-up visit to patients and their caregivers separately. More than 80.00% of the questions answered were included in the analysis. The mean score for each question for Usual Care and PRISMS were compared.

    2-month followup survey

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Difference of Quality of Life Change Over Time as Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G).

    baseline , 2 months

  • Difference of Anxiety Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form 7a

    Baseline and 2 months

  • Difference of Depression Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression Short From 8b

    Baseline, 2 months

  • Difference Pain Score Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b

    Baseline, 2 months

  • Difference of Fatigue Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS Fatigue -Short Form 7a

    Baseline, 2 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PRISMS

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to usual care, participants assigned to this arm will have access to our Patient-Reported Outcomes-Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) program.

Behavioral: Patient-Reported Outcomes-Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS)

Usual Care

NO INTERVENTION

Participants assigned to this arm will receive the standard of care that is provided to all patients.

Interventions

Participants will receive personalized self-care information and guidance based on their symptoms and signs of complications (e.g., skin infection, fatigue) from the web-based telehealth PRISMS program. They will also have access through this website a peer support online forum that is moderated by a research nurse as well as professional support through videoconferencing/telephone from the research nurse and also their healthcare providers at the hospital(s) if they experience moderate to severe symptoms and/or abnormal sign (e.g., body temperature is greater than 98.6 C

PRISMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must:
  • have been surgically treated for colorectal, bladder, ovarian, cervical, or uterine cancer with curative intent;
  • be within one month of hospital discharge of a newly created ostomy with curative intent;
  • be able to read and speak English;
  • be 18 years or older;
  • have a caregiver who is willing to participate in the study;
  • Caregivers must:
  • be 18 years or older;
  • be able to read and speak English;
  • be identified as the primary caregiver by the patient;
  • have not themselves been diagnosed with cancer or received cancer treatment during the study (to ensure that patients and caregivers focus their efforts on care of the patient).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients and their caregivers will be excluded if they:
  • are unable to read, speak, or understand English;
  • have more than one type of ostomy;
  • have other cancer diagnosis (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer); or
  • have cognitive impairment (assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Xu S, Tan X, Ma C, McElyea RS, Shieh K, Stover AM, Smith A, Stitzenberg K, Basch E, Song L. An eHealth symptom and complication management program for cancer patients with newly created ostomies and their caregivers (Alliance): a pilot feasibility randomized trial. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10919-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUterine Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesUrologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal DisordersUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Xianming Tan PhD
Organization
University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Officials

  • Lixin Song, RN, PhD

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2020

First Posted

July 30, 2020

Study Start

November 2, 2020

Primary Completion

October 21, 2021

Study Completion

December 20, 2021

Last Updated

February 3, 2025

Results First Posted

February 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a pilot study with very small sample size and specific inclusion criteria. Sharing data with others may increase the risk to patient confidentiality.

Locations