Feasibility Testing of Patient Reported Outcomes - Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS)
PRISMS
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a proof-of-concept pilot randomized clinical trial to test the feasibility of the innovative Patient-Reported Outcomes-Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) to enhance personalized supportive care for cancer patients and caregivers during post-treatment care transition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2025
CompletedFebruary 3, 2025
January 1, 2025
12 months
June 24, 2020
June 3, 2024
January 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Enrollment Number
The enrollment rate is defined as the number of potentially eligible couples (dyads) who have consented to participate in the study. 1 Dyad = 1 participant + their caregiver. Potentially eligible dyads (subjects and their caregivers) were approached and informed about the study. then the number of dyads who consented and completed.
Baseline
Number of Potentially Eligible Dyads Participants Actually Enrolled in the Study
Potentially Eligible Dyads Participants Actually Enrolled in the Study will be evaluated by the number of dyads who successfully consented and completed the baseline survey among all people approached for the study. 1 Dyad = 1 participant + their caregiver.
Baseline, after consent
Number of Dyads Remained in the Study and Completed the Post-Intervention Follow-Up Survey.
The number of dyad Participants Enrolled who Remained in the Study and Completed the Post-Intervention Follow-Up Survey was assessed by the number of enrolled dyad participants who completed the 2-month follow-up survey at the end of the study period.
Up to 3 months (2-month follow up survey)
Usability of Reported Outcomes - Patient Reported Outcomes - Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS)
Usability of Reported Outcomes - Patient Reported Outcomes - Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) evaluates three aspects: General, content, and navigation, contains 19 items on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree". The score for each aspect was calculated as the sum of the scores from all items in this aspect. The scores ranged between 5 and 25 for General and Content, and the Navigation score ranged between 9 and 45. The higher score of the specific aspect that patients and their caregivers reported indicates the better usability of the aspect. This survey was offered separately at the follow-up visit to patients and their caregivers. Participants who completed at least 80.00% of the questions were included in the analysis. Usual Care and Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) group scores were compared.
Up to 2 months (Follow up survey)
Satisfaction With the PRISMS Program
The satisfaction survey evaluates satisfaction with various aspects, contains 9 items on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5, and higher scores reflect better satisfaction. Questions: Q1. The amount of time to review the program every time. Q2. Ease of navigating. Q3. Information I received. Q4. Quality of the information I received. Q5. The program has increased my knowledge about managing my symptoms and complications. Q6. The program has improved how I manage my symptoms and complications. Q7. The program has improved how I communicate with my family about sensitive topics related to my cancer care. Q8. The time and effort took me to complete. Q9. My knowledge about how my cancer has affected my partner and our relationship was improved. This survey was offered at the follow-up visit to patients and their caregivers separately. More than 80.00% of the questions answered were included in the analysis. The mean score for each question for Usual Care and PRISMS were compared.
2-month followup survey
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Difference of Quality of Life Change Over Time as Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G).
baseline , 2 months
Difference of Anxiety Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Anxiety Short Form 7a
Baseline and 2 months
Difference of Depression Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS-Emotional Distress-Depression Short From 8b
Baseline, 2 months
Difference Pain Score Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b
Baseline, 2 months
Difference of Fatigue Change Over Time as Assessed by PROMIS Fatigue -Short Form 7a
Baseline, 2 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PRISMS
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to usual care, participants assigned to this arm will have access to our Patient-Reported Outcomes-Informed Symptom Management System (PRISMS) program.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants assigned to this arm will receive the standard of care that is provided to all patients.
Interventions
Participants will receive personalized self-care information and guidance based on their symptoms and signs of complications (e.g., skin infection, fatigue) from the web-based telehealth PRISMS program. They will also have access through this website a peer support online forum that is moderated by a research nurse as well as professional support through videoconferencing/telephone from the research nurse and also their healthcare providers at the hospital(s) if they experience moderate to severe symptoms and/or abnormal sign (e.g., body temperature is greater than 98.6 C
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must:
- have been surgically treated for colorectal, bladder, ovarian, cervical, or uterine cancer with curative intent;
- be within one month of hospital discharge of a newly created ostomy with curative intent;
- be able to read and speak English;
- be 18 years or older;
- have a caregiver who is willing to participate in the study;
- Caregivers must:
- be 18 years or older;
- be able to read and speak English;
- be identified as the primary caregiver by the patient;
- have not themselves been diagnosed with cancer or received cancer treatment during the study (to ensure that patients and caregivers focus their efforts on care of the patient).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients and their caregivers will be excluded if they:
- are unable to read, speak, or understand English;
- have more than one type of ostomy;
- have other cancer diagnosis (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer); or
- have cognitive impairment (assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (1)
Xu S, Tan X, Ma C, McElyea RS, Shieh K, Stover AM, Smith A, Stitzenberg K, Basch E, Song L. An eHealth symptom and complication management program for cancer patients with newly created ostomies and their caregivers (Alliance): a pilot feasibility randomized trial. BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10919-x.
PMID: 37301841DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Xianming Tan PhD
- Organization
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lixin Song, RN, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2020
First Posted
July 30, 2020
Study Start
November 2, 2020
Primary Completion
October 21, 2021
Study Completion
December 20, 2021
Last Updated
February 3, 2025
Results First Posted
February 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is a pilot study with very small sample size and specific inclusion criteria. Sharing data with others may increase the risk to patient confidentiality.