Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer Using Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
QARC
Pathological Response Prediction to Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Carcinoma and Comparison of Engineered Features Versus Deep Learning Models
1 other identifier
observational
150
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
In esophageal carcinoma, neoadjuvant concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (NA-CCRT) followed by surgery is the current standard of care and ample evidence has accumulated supporting the view that complete pathological response (pCR) is a positive prognostic marker for improved outcomes. Predicting the probability of achieving pCR prior to neoadjuvant treatment could permit modification of treatment protocols for those patients unlikely to achieve pCR. Radiomics is a new entrant in the field of imaging where specific features are derived from the intensity and distribution pattern of pixels based on a region-of-interest (ROI). The features thus extracted can then be used for prediction modelling similar to other -omics datasets. Preliminary investigations examining its utility have been performed and its applications have thus far focused on screening and survival prediction after treatment. Due to the multi-dimensional nature of data extracted using radiomics, Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are ideally suited for analysing and modelling radiomic features. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)\[utilising Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)\] are both part of the AI framework. In contrast to ML, DL is a new entrant and has been utilised by some medical researchers for modelling using prediction-type algorithms. Besides significantly reducing the workflow associated with Radiomics-based research, feature engineering and modelling using DL are immune to the effects of incorrect ROI delineation. However, the main limitation of DL is the 'blackbox' effect, in which the underlying basis of a CNN is not known. This has been mitigated in part by the visualisation of activation maps directly on the image dataset to prove biological plausibility of predictions. The comparative performance of both types of modelling is also not known. Our objective is to investigate pCR probability in our study population using radiomics-based ML and AI-based modelling. We will also investigate the comparative performance of both modelling techniques. For DL based prediction modelling, we will attempt to provide biological plausibility on the basis of activation maps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 28, 2022
December 1, 2022
3.5 years
July 23, 2020
December 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Develop models to predict pCR based on pre-neoadjuvant imaging modalities
August 2021
Perform a clinical audit of patient outcomes (OS, RFS, pCR rate) after new-adjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy
January 2020
Study Arms (1)
Study Group
Patients undergoing NA-CCRT followed by Surgery
Interventions
Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy via any technique, delivered concurrently with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy.
Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy, delivered concurrently with Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy.
Esophagectomy, performed 4-6 weeks after completion of Neo-Adjuvant Concurrent ChemoRadiation
Eligibility Criteria
Patient records in each participating research center from January 2011 to 1st May 2020
You may qualify if:
- ECOG Performance Status: 0-2
- Patients with histopathological or cytopathological confirmed malignancy of the esophagus
- Histology: Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma
- Patients should have received NeoAdjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation (NACCRT) followed by Surgery
- All therapeutic interventions (Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy \& Surgery) delivered within participating institutions
- At least one pre-NACCRT DICOM imaging dataset (HRCT/ 18-FDG PET-CT/ Radiotherapy planning CT) for each patient
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with any metallic implants in the region of interest
- Patient with locally advanced disease or metastatic disease (T4 disease, Fistula, metastases)
- Patients with prior history of radiotherapy in the same region
- Patients developing a second malignancy in the esophagus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Illawarra Cancer Care Centre
Wollongong, 2500, Australia
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110019, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kundan S Chufal, MD
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant & Chief of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2020
First Posted
July 28, 2020
Study Start
January 16, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share