The Impact of Post-operative Voiding Trial on Length of Stay Following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Active vs. Passive Voiding Trials in a Gynecologic Oncologic Patient Population Undergoing Same-day Discharge Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
130
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of an active voiding trial compared to a passive voiding trial on time to discharge following a planned same day discharge laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigators hypothesize that performing an active voiding trial will assess urinary function and lead to a reduction in length of stay.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2020
CompletedNovember 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
July 17, 2020
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
length of hospital stay
Time (minutes) from the completion of surgery to discharge from the post-operative recovery unit
within 24 hours (1440 minutes) following surgical procedure (while most participants are discharged on the same day some participants require overnight admission with length of stay up to 24 hours- though still measured in minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
time to void
within 12 hours (720 minutes) following surgical procedure
catheter replacement
within 24 hours (1440 minutes) following surgical procedure
discomfort with voiding trial
within 12 hours (720 minutes) following surgical procedure
overnight admission
within 1 day following surgical procedure
Study Arms (2)
Active Voiding Trial
EXPERIMENTALAt the completion of surgery, a Foley catheter was left in place. When the patient was determined to be ambulatory by the recovery room nurse, the bladder was backfilled with 300cc of sterile normal saline. Voiding 200cc or (2/3) of the backfill amount was considered passing.
Passive Voiding Trial
NO INTERVENTIONAt the completion of surgery, a Foley catheter was removed in the operating room. Study participants were allowed six hours to void spontaneously, with 200cc being considered adequate consistent with institution standard practice. At the completion of six hours, if spontaneous voiding has not occurred, a bladder scan was performed and additional time was allowed based on bladder volume with criteria previously established as institution standards based on published practices.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled to undergo a total laparoscopic hysterectomy by a gynecologic oncology surgeon for either benign or malignant disease
- planned same day discharge surgery
You may not qualify if:
- history of significant urinary dysfunction (such as home catheterization) or neurologic dysfunction precluding spontaneous voiding
- bilateral radical pelvic dissection (defined as bilateral ureterolysis or removal of bilateral parametria)
- surgical cases converted to laparotomy or open surgery
- Surgical or medical contra-indications (based on the surgeons or anesthesiologists' recommendations) to same day discharge requiring inpatient admission
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (15)
Lee J, Jennings K, Borahay MA, Rodriguez AM, Kilic GS, Snyder RR, Patel PR. Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PMID: 24462854BACKGROUNDPitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB. The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.
PMID: 25048103BACKGROUNDSchiavone MB, Herzog TJ, Ananth CV, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):382.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
PMID: 23107080BACKGROUNDWalker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Spiegel G, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5331-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
PMID: 19805679BACKGROUNDWalker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 1;30(7):695-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
PMID: 22291074BACKGROUNDMelamed A, Katz Eriksen JL, Hinchcliff EM, Worley MJ Jr, Berkowitz RS, Horowitz NS, Muto MG, Urman RD, Feltmate CM. Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):178-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4582-4. Epub 2015 May 9.
PMID: 25956576BACKGROUNDNahas S, Feigenberg T, Park S. Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: A systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):439-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.113. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PMID: 27475523BACKGROUNDGeller EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 28;6:829-38. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S55383. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25210477BACKGROUNDFoundation W-BF. Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. 2016
BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDGhezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Colombo G, Salvatore S, Tomera S, Bolis P. Immediate Foley removal after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: determinants of postoperative urinary retention. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):706-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.013.
PMID: 17980330RESULTGeller EJ, Hankins KJ, Parnell BA, Robinson BL, Dunivan GC. Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):637-642. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd.
PMID: 21860294RESULTFoster RT Sr, Borawski KM, South MM, Weidner AC, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):627.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.017.
PMID: 18060956RESULTPulvino JQ, Duecy EE, Buchsbaum GM, Flynn MK. Comparison of 2 techniques to predict voiding efficiency after inpatient urogynecologic surgery. J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.096. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PMID: 20727543RESULTAlessandri F, Mistrangelo E, Lijoi D, Ferrero S, Ragni N. A prospective, randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):716-20. doi: 10.1080/00016340600606976.
PMID: 16752265RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Voiding trial protocols for each group (AVT and PVT) as well as data collection sheets were stored in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes which were assigned after enrollment and were opened in the operating room at the completion of surgery by the surgical assistant. Attending surgeons and investigators were blinded to the individual patient study assignment. Due to the nature of the study, participants were not masked to their intervention.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- BWPO Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2020
First Posted
July 27, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 4, 2017
Study Completion
August 4, 2017
Last Updated
November 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data will be available upon request until the time of publication.
- Access Criteria
- requests should be made via the study contact email.
De-identified patient data and voiding protocols will be made available upon request via email to other researchers