The Effect of Capsaicin-induced Pain on Homeostatic Plasticity in Healthy Human Participants
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People suffering from chronic pain exhibit changes in the way the central nervous system processes pain. Some of the changes in the central nervous system are associated with how the brain adapts to the process of different stimuli. There are several physiological mechanisms that regulates how the brain adapts to changes and one of these mechanisms is called homeostatic plasticity (or equilibrium plasticity ). In healthy participants homeostatic plasticity mechanisms have been tested and considered normal, whereas in patients with chronic conditions, such as low back pain, this mechanism was shown to be dysfunctional. However, it is unknown when this difference in the pain system develops. It is possible that homeostatic mechanism becomes impaired during early stages of pain. This experiment will investigate the effect of capsaicin-induced pain on homeostatic plasticity in healthy participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 31, 2020
August 1, 2020
5 months
July 13, 2020
August 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Conspiratorial excitability
Corticospinal excitability measured as motor evoked potentials amplitude induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
[Time Frame: 0 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction]
Conspiratorial excitability
Corticospinal excitability measured as motor evoked potentials amplitude induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
[Time Frame: 15 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction]
Conspiratorial excitability
Corticospinal excitability measured as motor evoked potentials amplitude induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
[Time Frame: 30 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction]
Conspiratorial excitability
Corticospinal excitability measured as motor evoked potentials amplitude induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
[Time Frame: 45 minutes post homeostatic plasticity induction]
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity
Every 10 minutes post capsaicin application
Study Arms (4)
Capsaicin - alone
EXPERIMENTAL5x7 cm2 capsaicin patch
Placebo - alone
PLACEBO COMPARATOR5x7 cm2 placebo patch alone
Capsaicin - ice
EXPERIMENTAL5x7 cm2 capsaicin patch - plus ice
Placebo - ice
PLACEBO COMPARATOR5x7 cm2 placebo patch - plus ice
Interventions
5x7 cm2 capsaicin patch applied on the dorsal area of the hand and left in place for 24 hours
5x7 cm2 patch applied on the dorsal area of the hand and left in place for 24 hours
5x7 cm2 capsaicin patch applied on the dorsal area of the hand and left in place for 24 hours. Ice will be applied on top of the patch 1.5 hrs post patch application and left in place for 1 hr.
5x7 cm2 patch applied on the dorsal area of the hand and left in place for 24 hours. Ice will be applied on top of the patch 1.5 hrs post patch application and left in place for 1 hr.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy, aged between 18-60 years, right-handed and can speak and understand English.
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of ability to cooperate
- Chili allergy
- History or present chronic pain or current acute pain
- Pregnancy
- Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
- Present and previous neurological disorders such as epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease,
- dementia, stroke, migraine and other headache disorders, multiple sclerosis,
- Parkinson's disease, neuroinfections, brain tumors and head trauma.
- Present or previous musculoskeletal disorders such as tendonitis, degenerative disc disease, mechanical back syndrome, and ruptured/herniated disc.
- Present or previous mental illnesses such as depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.
- Current use of medications that may affect the trial (e.g. analgesics, anti- inflammatories, anti-depressives)
- Contraindications to TMS application (history of epilepsy, metal implants in head or jaw, etc.)
- Failure to pass the tDCS screening questionnaire
- Failure to pass the "TASS questionnaire"
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aalborg University
Aalborg, 9220, Denmark
Related Publications (5)
Thapa T, Graven-Nielsen T, Chipchase LS, Schabrun SM. Disruption of cortical synaptic homeostasis in individuals with chronic low back pain. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 May;129(5):1090-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.01.060. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
PMID: 29472134BACKGROUNDThapa T, Schabrun SM. Test-Retest Reliability of Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Primary Motor Cortex. Neural Plast. 2018 Jun 10;2018:6207508. doi: 10.1155/2018/6207508. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29983706BACKGROUNDKarabanov A, Ziemann U, Hamada M, George MS, Quartarone A, Classen J, Massimini M, Rothwell J, Siebner HR. Consensus Paper: Probing Homeostatic Plasticity of Human Cortex With Non-invasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):442-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.404. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
PMID: 26050599BACKGROUNDFricke K, Seeber AA, Thirugnanasambandam N, Paulus W, Nitsche MA, Rothwell JC. Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Mar;105(3):1141-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00608.2009. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
PMID: 21177994BACKGROUNDRossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
PMID: 25797650BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2020
First Posted
July 24, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share