NCT04484584

Brief Summary

Trauma results in inflammatory reactions accompanied by high protein edema. Trauma can also reduce the carrying capacity of the lymphatic system below normal lymphatic load, leading to exposure of lymphedema. Cellular wastes accumulated in interstitial fields and prolonged exudation period create a physiological problem. It causes the recovery time of tissues to be completed late and the functional gains to be delayed. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of Complex decongestive therapy on traumatic edema, pain and functionality.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 17, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 17, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 17, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Volumetric test measurement

    Volumetric test measurement is more than 50 mL, edema is considered to be present.

    at baseline

  • Volumetric test measurement

    Volumetric test measurement is more than 50 mL, edema is considered to be present.

    4. week

  • Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnarie

    The raw scale score for each of the six scales is the sum of the responses of each scale item. The raw score is converted to a score ranging from 0-100. The MHQ is scored using a general algorithm. The response categories for one of the questions is reversed and re-coded. For the Pain scale, a higher score indicates more pain. For the other five scales, higher scores indicate better hand performance.

    at baseline

  • Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnarie

    The raw scale score for each of the six scales is the sum of the responses of each scale item. The raw score is converted to a score ranging from 0-100. The MHQ is scored using a general algorithm. The response categories for one of the questions is reversed and re-coded. For the Pain scale, a higher score indicates more pain. For the other five scales, higher scores indicate better hand performance.

    4. week

  • Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation

    The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales: Pain subscale: contains 5 items each of which is further rated from 1-10. The maximum score in this section is 50 and minimum 0 Function subscale: contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections i.e specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities (having 4 items). The maximum score in this section is 50 and minimum 0.

    at baseline

  • Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation

    The PRWE allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales: Pain subscale: contains 5 items each of which is further rated from 1-10. The maximum score in this section is 50 and minimum 0 Function subscale: contains total 10 items which are further divided into 2 sections i.e specific activities (having 6 items) and usual activities (having 4 items). The maximum score in this section is 50 and minimum 0.

    4. week

  • Quick DASH

    Quick DASH measures upper extremity functionality. Quick DASH score calculation is made as disability / symptom score: (\[n total score / n\] -1) x25. The options are 'no difficulty' 'mild difficulty' 'moderate difficulty' severe difficulty 'and' unable '. 'no difficulty' is zero points and 'unable' is four.

    at baseline

  • Quick DASH

    Quick DASH measures upper extremity functionality. Quick DASH score calculation is made as disability / symptom score: (\[n total score / n\] -1) x25. The options are 'no difficulty' 'mild difficulty' 'moderate difficulty' severe difficulty 'and' unable '. 'no difficulty' is zero points and 'unable' is four.

    4. week

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Myometer test

    at baseline

  • Myometer test

    4.week

  • Dynamometer test

    at baseline

  • Dynamometer test

    4.week

Study Arms (2)

Complex Decongestive Therapy Group (CDT)

Complex Decongestive Therapy Group: The treatment was applied by a specialist therapist who received CDT training. The study group rehabilitation and CDT application is 1 hour. CDT Treatment Protocol: Deep abdominal technique application Neck region CDT application (supraclavicular fossa circular motion-Eflöraj) Circular movements on ipsilateral Axillar lymph nodes Circular movements on bottle neck cubital fossa Front arm bucket pumping pump push MLD application of dorsal and palmar face of the hand to ulnar and radial bundles Bandage Treatment (Fingers and hand and forearm bandage): Patients can stay for 6-8 hours or until the next day. Patients can do exercises in bandages. The patient is given home education. The treatment was made for approximately 30-45 minutes. Patients were given exercise training at home. Orthopedic rehabilitation is the same as the control group.

Other: complex decongestive therapy

Orthopedic Rehabilitation Group (OR)

Orthopedic Rehabilitation Group: The treatment was made for approximately 30-45 minutes. Patients were given exercise training at home. Orthopedic Rehabilitation Treatment Protocol: Exercises to be done at 4 to 6 weeks: Wrist NEH (at the pain limit),active exercise,Grasp exercise Exercises to be done at 6 to 8 weeks: Wrist NEH (at the pain limit),Active assistive / active exercise, Grasp exercise,Supination-pronation exercise. (Opposite baths and classical massage are recommended from orthopedics) Exercises to be done at 8 to 10 weeks: Stretching exercises,Finger strengthening spring with Digiflex spring, Power web combo hand finger arm amplifier, Msd theraflex hand exercise dough, Theraband flevbar exercise bar. Exercises to be done at 10 to 12 weeks Wrist strengthening exercises, Resistant exercises to all muscles.

Other: complex decongestive therapy

Interventions

Manual lymphatic drainage Manuel lymphatic drainage therapeutic technique is used for reducing edema and symptoms related with edema by accelerating lymphatic drainage. The aim of massage along the extremity is to provide fluid drainage.Manuel lymphatic drainage stimulates the internal contraction of lymphatic channels. If interstitial space concentration of protein is reduced, it provides drainage of obstructed lymph fluid from local lymph nodes.

Complex Decongestive Therapy Group (CDT)Orthopedic Rehabilitation Group (OR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

patients with distal radius fracture

You may qualify if:

  • Over 45 years
  • Unilateral distal radius fracture treated with plaster cast
  • Begin treatment after (7-10) days after removing the plaster
  • At least 50 mL of the volume difference between the upper extremities
  • Having signed the consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Associated ulna fracture
  • Pathological fracture
  • polytrauma
  • Bilateral fractures
  • With chronic kidney disease
  • The presence of infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi konuk training and research hospital

Istanbul, 34158, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Priganc V, Walter JR, Sublett SH. Edema assessment and management practice patterns among hand therapists: Survey research. J Hand Ther. 2020 Jul-Sep;33(3):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

    PMID: 31623957BACKGROUND
  • Rohner-Spengler M, Frotzler A, Honigmann P, Babst R. Effective Treatment of Posttraumatic and Postoperative Edema in Patients with Ankle and Hindfoot Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Multilayer Compression Therapy and Intermittent Impulse Compression with the Standard Treatment with Ice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Aug 6;96(15):1263-1271. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00939.

    PMID: 25100773BACKGROUND
  • Miller LK, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L. Effectiveness of edema management techniques for subacute hand edema: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;30(4):432-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

    PMID: 28807598BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Study Officials

  • meltem vural

    Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • banu aydeniz

    Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • tuba Altun

    Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hasan Kerem Alptekin

    Bahçeşehir University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc,Physotherapist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2020

First Posted

July 23, 2020

Study Start

March 17, 2020

Primary Completion

July 17, 2021

Study Completion

July 17, 2021

Last Updated

August 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-08

Locations