NCT04287257

Brief Summary

Distal radial fractures (DRF) are the most common fractures encountered in health care. Annualized estimates in the United States alone suggest an incidence of approximately 640,000 cases, and rising, per year. Most fractures may be treated in a plaster cast, but unstable fractures tend to displace without a surgical procedure. 1 Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) is one modality commonly used to stimulate bone generation throughout various clinical settings including orthoapedic surgery. PEMF has been shown to primarily effect vascular generation, formation and neovascularization2,3. This may help decrease time to healing and allow patients to return to normal activities sooner. Additional study demonstrated that PEMF exposure increased cell proliferation, adhesion and the osteogenic commitment of MSCs, even in inflammatory conditions. In this in-vitro model PEMFs increased the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, and reduced the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 4. The distal radius fracture was chosen as the model to test the effects of PEMF treatment because it includes both trabecular and cortical bone, is accessible for radiographs, has little soft tissue that can distort the radiograph, and is amenable to multiple functional endpoints. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the use of FHP by means of pulsed electromagnetic fields in acute distal radius fractures will accelerate healing both clinically and radiotralogically

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 27, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 26, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in radiographic fracture healing

    Change from baseline in radiographic fracture healing will be measured. Radiographic healing will be defined as the interval in days between the occurrence of the fracture and the time when bridging in three of four cortices is seen on X-ray images. A measurement will be made at each follow up evaluation by using Radius Union Scoring System (RUSS) score

    Radiographic images (X-ray) will be performed for each subject from day 0 and onward: week 2,4, 6 and 12.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in improvement of function

    Functional assessment will be performed at 4, 6 and 12 weeks from treatment

Study Arms (2)

Standard treatment + Active FHP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The PEMF device - FHP (supplied by commercial support) will be placed under the cast in the ER after diagnosing the fracture and will be applied for 24 hours a day continuously for 30-40 days.

Device: Fracture Healing Patch (FHP)

Standard treatment + Sham FHP

SHAM COMPARATOR

Half of the PEMF devices will be not activated at random before the application to the patients. Two types of activators will be provided by the company: active and sham. Sham activated devices will give outward signs of normal function but will not generate a signal. The investigators will be unaware of the device's functionality. The patients will not be able to determine whether the device is working or not. At study completion, device serial numbers will be used to determine which patients received a working device. The company supplying the PEMF-devices will have no knowledge of patient outcome.

Device: Fracture Healing Patch (FHP)

Interventions

The Fracture Healing Patch (FHP) is an external silicone patch that contains inside micro-electronic modulus, which generates a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) to enhance and improve fracture healing. The FHP is placed under the cast at the fracture site. Throughout the treatment period the FHP produces a pulsed electromagnetic field. The FHP houses a battery, a microelectronic module and a coil that produce the PEMF.

Standard treatment + Active FHPStandard treatment + Sham FHP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects with closed unilateral dorsally angulated fracture of the distal radius (Colles') visible by x-ray.
  • Subjects treated conservatively by immobilization ± closed reduction
  • Age \>18 years
  • Subjects able to adhere to the visit schedule and protocol requirements and be available to complete the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with intra articular fracture or extra-articular fracture that meets the criteria for operative fracture fixation.
  • Subjects with pins or plates in the wrist
  • Sustained previous fractures or bone surgery in the currently fractured distal forearm
  • Synovial pseudarthrosis
  • Subjects with multiple trauma (several fractures at once)
  • Subjects suffering from joint diseases that affect the function of the wrist and/or hand of the injured arm.
  • Pregnancy
  • Women who are breast-feeding.
  • Women of childbearing potential and not using a medically accepted form of contraception when sexually active.
  • presence of a life supporting implanted electronical device

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Central Study Contacts

Reut Wengier

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Research and Developement Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2020

First Posted

February 27, 2020

Study Start

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

March 1, 2022

Last Updated

February 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share