CanMove: A Physical Activity Program for Children With Cancer
CanMove: The Feasibility of Implementing a Physical Activity Intervention for Children Undergoing Acute Cancer Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate a physical activity intervention for children during acute cancer treatment. The intervention aims to encourage children to participate in increased levels of physical activity and reduce the amount of time they spend engaged in sedentary activities. This study also aims to evaluate different ways of assessing physical function in order to determine the best outcome measure to use for children during acute cancer treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 3, 2021
CompletedJune 3, 2022
June 1, 2022
10 months
July 14, 2020
June 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Demand for the intervention
Recruitment rate (comparing the number of people recruited to the number of potentially eligible participants), and documenting the reasons for non-participation.
Through completion of recruitment, estimated as 9 months
Acceptability of the intervention according to participants
Participant and participant guardian perspective on intervention satisfaction and potential areas of improvement via semi-structured interviews
After completion of the intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Acceptability of the intervention according to staff
Staff perspective on intervention satisfaction and potential areas of improvement via focus groups with staff members
Through study completion, estimated as 1 year
Implementation of the intervention: adherence to wearing Fitbit
Adherence to wearing the Fitbit for monitoring, percentage of complete Fitbit data days out of total intervention days
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Implementation of the intervention: attendance to intervention sessions
Adherence to attending intervention sessions, percentage of intervention sessions that were attended
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Implementation of the intervention: ability for participants to attain their steps per day goal
Goal attainment, percentage of days out of total intervention days that participant was able to achieve their steps per day target
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Practicality of the intervention: adverse events
Measured by number of adverse events reported related to trial procedures. At each trial visit, participants will be asked "How have you felt since your last visit?" in order to elicit any changes in their well-being. They will also be asked if they have had any falls, new injuries, felt distress as a result of the intervention or experienced a change in medical or mobility status. Adverse events relevant to participant safety will also be documented from correspondence from their primary care physician or from the medical record. Adverse events recorded as serious or non-serious, related or not related to the intervention.
Post the participant's final trial visit (on average 12 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph steps per day
Mean change from pre to post intervention in average steps taken per day measured via the Actigraph
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit steps per day
Mean change from pre to post intervention in average steps taken per day measured via the Fitbit
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph distance travelled per day
Mean change from pre to post intervention in average distance travelled per day measured via the Actigraph
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit distance travelled per day
Mean change from pre to post intervention in average distance travelled per day measured via the Fitbit
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph physical activity intensity
Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in different physical activity intensities (sedentary, light, moderate-vigorous and vigorous) measured by the Actigraph
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit physical activity intensity
Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in different physical activity intensities (sedentary, light, moderate-vigorous and vigorous) measured by the Fitbit
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: sedentary bouts
Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of sedentary bouts per day measured via the Actigraph
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: body position
Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in each body position per day measured via the Actigraph
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: active hours
Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of active hours per day measured via the Fitbit
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: active minutes
Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of active minutes per day measured via the Fitbit
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Movement ABC
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: 6 Minute Walk Test
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Timed Up and Go
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Timed Up and Down Stairs
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Time to Rise from the Floor
Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Construct validity of physical function measures
Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)
Interpretability of physical function measures
Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)
Responsiveness of physical function measures
Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Physical Activity
EXPERIMENTALBehavioural change techniques to promote physical activity
Interventions
Structured weekly sessions with a Physiotherapist over an 8 week period, including: * Evaluation of current levels of physical activity and physical function - including discussion of results * Education regarding the importance of physical activity * Supervised physical activity session with a physiotherapist * Structured weekly sessions applying behavioural change techniques which aim to increase participation in physical activity. Sessions include: provision of activity monitor (Fitbit Inspire), goal setting, monitoring, collaborative problem solving and action plan implementation. Intervention includes additional time allowance of 1 hour per week to assist in implementing action plan items
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is between the ages of 5-17 years at the time of consent
- Diagnosed (or relapsed) with cancer \>4 weeks and \<6 months at time of consent
- Currently receiving cancer treatment at the Royal Children's Hospital
- Has been an in-patient for \>7 consecutive days at the time of consent
- Provide a signed and dated informed consent form and/or has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf
You may not qualify if:
- Deemed by the treating medical team as unsafe to participate
- Child/adolescent unable to mobilise independent of clinical staff assistance, as classified by the research team at the time of consent (use of a gait aid or assistance from a primary carer/support person is accepted). For example, if a child/adolescent requires assistance from nursing staff or physiotherapist in order to walk, they will be excluded.
- Child/adolescent unable to follow simple instructions
- Suitable support person (18 years and over) not available to participate in continuous monitoring of daily steps in tandem with the child/adolescent
- No suitable access to a device to sync with a Fitbit
- Inability or unwillingness of participant or legally acceptable representative to give written informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institutelead
- La Trobe Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Royal Children's Hospital
Parkville, Victora, 3052, Australia
Related Publications (1)
Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
PMID: 19362699BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sarah L Grimshaw
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2020
First Posted
July 23, 2020
Study Start
November 9, 2020
Primary Completion
September 3, 2021
Study Completion
September 3, 2021
Last Updated
June 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 3 months following publication - until the end of archival period (15 year post-trial completion (TGA) or until child aged 25 years (whichever is the later))
- Access Criteria
- Research projects that have been approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee
The participants will be asked to voluntarily consent to data sharing. Beginning from 3 months after article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access: * Individual de-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article (text, tables, figures and appendices) * Trial protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Participant Informed Consent Form