NCT04483362

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate a physical activity intervention for children during acute cancer treatment. The intervention aims to encourage children to participate in increased levels of physical activity and reduce the amount of time they spend engaged in sedentary activities. This study also aims to evaluate different ways of assessing physical function in order to determine the best outcome measure to use for children during acute cancer treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 9, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 3, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 3, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

June 3, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 2, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

physical activity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (17)

  • Demand for the intervention

    Recruitment rate (comparing the number of people recruited to the number of potentially eligible participants), and documenting the reasons for non-participation.

    Through completion of recruitment, estimated as 9 months

  • Acceptability of the intervention according to participants

    Participant and participant guardian perspective on intervention satisfaction and potential areas of improvement via semi-structured interviews

    After completion of the intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Acceptability of the intervention according to staff

    Staff perspective on intervention satisfaction and potential areas of improvement via focus groups with staff members

    Through study completion, estimated as 1 year

  • Implementation of the intervention: adherence to wearing Fitbit

    Adherence to wearing the Fitbit for monitoring, percentage of complete Fitbit data days out of total intervention days

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Implementation of the intervention: attendance to intervention sessions

    Adherence to attending intervention sessions, percentage of intervention sessions that were attended

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Implementation of the intervention: ability for participants to attain their steps per day goal

    Goal attainment, percentage of days out of total intervention days that participant was able to achieve their steps per day target

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Practicality of the intervention: adverse events

    Measured by number of adverse events reported related to trial procedures. At each trial visit, participants will be asked "How have you felt since your last visit?" in order to elicit any changes in their well-being. They will also be asked if they have had any falls, new injuries, felt distress as a result of the intervention or experienced a change in medical or mobility status. Adverse events relevant to participant safety will also be documented from correspondence from their primary care physician or from the medical record. Adverse events recorded as serious or non-serious, related or not related to the intervention.

    Post the participant's final trial visit (on average 12 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph steps per day

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in average steps taken per day measured via the Actigraph

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit steps per day

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in average steps taken per day measured via the Fitbit

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph distance travelled per day

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in average distance travelled per day measured via the Actigraph

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit distance travelled per day

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in average distance travelled per day measured via the Fitbit

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Actigraph physical activity intensity

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in different physical activity intensities (sedentary, light, moderate-vigorous and vigorous) measured by the Actigraph

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: Fitbit physical activity intensity

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in different physical activity intensities (sedentary, light, moderate-vigorous and vigorous) measured by the Fitbit

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: sedentary bouts

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of sedentary bouts per day measured via the Actigraph

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: body position

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in time spent in each body position per day measured via the Actigraph

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: active hours

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of active hours per day measured via the Fitbit

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical activity between pre and post intervention: active minutes

    Mean change from pre to post intervention in number of active minutes per day measured via the Fitbit

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Movement ABC

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: 6 Minute Walk Test

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Timed Up and Go

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Timed Up and Down Stairs

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • Limited efficiency testing assessing changes in physical function from pre to post intervention: Time to Rise from the Floor

    Post intervention (on average 8 weeks)

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Construct validity of physical function measures

    Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)

  • Interpretability of physical function measures

    Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)

  • Responsiveness of physical function measures

    Post completion of follow up assessment (on average 10 weeks)

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Physical Activity

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioural change techniques to promote physical activity

Behavioral: Complex physical activity intervention

Interventions

Structured weekly sessions with a Physiotherapist over an 8 week period, including: * Evaluation of current levels of physical activity and physical function - including discussion of results * Education regarding the importance of physical activity * Supervised physical activity session with a physiotherapist * Structured weekly sessions applying behavioural change techniques which aim to increase participation in physical activity. Sessions include: provision of activity monitor (Fitbit Inspire), goal setting, monitoring, collaborative problem solving and action plan implementation. Intervention includes additional time allowance of 1 hour per week to assist in implementing action plan items

Physical Activity

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Is between the ages of 5-17 years at the time of consent
  • Diagnosed (or relapsed) with cancer \>4 weeks and \<6 months at time of consent
  • Currently receiving cancer treatment at the Royal Children's Hospital
  • Has been an in-patient for \>7 consecutive days at the time of consent
  • Provide a signed and dated informed consent form and/or has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf

You may not qualify if:

  • Deemed by the treating medical team as unsafe to participate
  • Child/adolescent unable to mobilise independent of clinical staff assistance, as classified by the research team at the time of consent (use of a gait aid or assistance from a primary carer/support person is accepted). For example, if a child/adolescent requires assistance from nursing staff or physiotherapist in order to walk, they will be excluded.
  • Child/adolescent unable to follow simple instructions
  • Suitable support person (18 years and over) not available to participate in continuous monitoring of daily steps in tandem with the child/adolescent
  • No suitable access to a device to sync with a Fitbit
  • Inability or unwillingness of participant or legally acceptable representative to give written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Royal Children's Hospital

Parkville, Victora, 3052, Australia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.

    PMID: 19362699BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Sarah L Grimshaw

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2020

First Posted

July 23, 2020

Study Start

November 9, 2020

Primary Completion

September 3, 2021

Study Completion

September 3, 2021

Last Updated

June 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The participants will be asked to voluntarily consent to data sharing. Beginning from 3 months after article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access: * Individual de-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article (text, tables, figures and appendices) * Trial protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Participant Informed Consent Form

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
3 months following publication - until the end of archival period (15 year post-trial completion (TGA) or until child aged 25 years (whichever is the later))
Access Criteria
Research projects that have been approved by a Human Research Ethics Committee

Locations