Mirror Therapy Versus Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on Upper Limb Function
Effects of Mirror Therapy Versus Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on Upper Limb Function in Post-stroke Patient
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to determine the effects of Mirror therapy on upper limb function in a post-stroke patient, To determine the effects of Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on upper limb function in a post-stroke patient and To compare the effects of Mirror therapy versus Repetitive Facilitation Exercise on upper limb function in the post-stroke patient. Study Design is Randomized control trial with a sample size of 50 participants. Sampling Technique used is Non-probability purposive assessor-blinded sampling technique and randomization through sealed envelope method Duration of study was 6 months.Study Setting of Railway general hospital. Inclusion criteria had Hemiparetic patient, Sub-acute and chronic stroke patients, First-ever stroke patient, Age: 40-60, Gender: both male and female, MMSE \>24, Modified Ashworth scale \<3, Stable patient (Good sitting balance ) and No visual-spatial hemineglect. Exclusion criteria of Unstable patient, Uncooperative patient, Orthopedic deformity, Aphasia, Visual infection and joint pain (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, ankle)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2020
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
September 1, 2020
5 months
July 8, 2020
September 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Fugal Meyer scale
Fugl Meyer assessment tool is used for the evaluation of recovery extent in post stroke patients. It consists of 226 total points and is divided in 5 major domains including sensory function, motor function, joint range of motion, balance and pain each domain contain multiple sub items. Scoring is being recorded on a (3-points ordinal scale) . upper limb total score is 66. Fugyl Meyer is also a reliable and highly valid tool with ICC=0.96 and internal consistency is 94.7%.
From baseline to 6th week
Wolf motor scale
The Wolf motor scale is considered as numerical catalogue for the assessment of upper extremity motor function. Motor skills of patients are assessed through time and well designed, practical and functional tasks. Total 15 task has been performed. the minimum value for each task is 1 and maximum value is 3. increased value shows improvement.This is also a reliable tool for upper limb motor function with fair inter rater reliability as the value of ICC=0.97-0.99 and internal consistency is 92.4%.
From baseline to 6th week
Upper extremity functional index
Upper extremity functional index is use for outcome measure in stroke patient. It consist of 20-item questionnaire and each item has 5 point ordinal scale The total sum of all item the final score is 80 point. The reliability of upper extremity functional index is (ICC=0.94)
From baseline to 6th week
Brunnstrom scale
Brunnstrom recovery scale is use for motor recovery in stroke patient .It consist of 7-stages, 1=Flaccid Paralysis,2=Spasticity,3=Spasticity is marked ,4=Spasticity decreased,5= Spasticity wanes,6= Coordination and pattern of movement can be near normal ,7=Normal The inter-rater reliability if burnnstrom recovery scale is (ICC 0.89-0.98) for arm and (ICC 0.69-0.92)for hand.
From baseline to 6th week
Study Arms (2)
mirror box therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe objects use for task-specific mirror therapy are duster, glass, the wooden block of different sizes and shapes, beads, coin, paper cards and spongy ball. In all these activities shoulder horizontal flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, elbow flexion-extension, forearm supination-pronation, wrist flexion-extension, finger flexion-extension, abduction, adduction, opposition, are performed automatically.
Repetitive Facilitation Exercise
EXPERIMENTALTreatment involved rapid passive stretching of the muscles of the targeted joints in conjunction with tapping and rubbing the skin to assist in the generation of a contraction.Shoulder horizontal flexion-extension , adduction-abduction ,elbow flexion-extension, forearm supination-pronation, wrist flexion-extension, finger flexion-extension, abduction, adduction, opposition, are performed
Interventions
* Patients in Task-specific mirror box therapy group will receive therapy for 30 min/day, 3 times/week for 6 weeks. * The patient is seated close to a table a mirror (33\*35 cm) was placed vertically. The involved hand was placed behind the mirror and uninvolved in front of the mirror. * The subject is asked to transfer small cubes from the middle position to the lateral side, placing pegs in holes and taking them out, turning over paper cards, placing steel needles in holes, stacking blocks, and putting glass on a shelf. * During the sessions, subjects will be asked to try and do the activity on the unaffected side and asked to do some movement with the paretic hand simultaneously.
* The patients in the control group will receive Repetitive Facilitation Exercise for 30 min/day, 3 times/week for 6 weeks. * Repetitive facilitative techniques were used to elicit movement of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers in a manner designed to minimize synergistic movements. * Participants were directed to concentrate on generating movement on the joint being treated while avoiding contraction of non-targeted muscles. * Therapists provided verbal directions with commands such as "bend/straighten" or "one, two, three. * Participant efforts were supplemented as necessary to achieve a full range of motion (ROM)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hemiparetic patient
- Sub-acute and chronic stroke patients
- First-ever stroke patient
- Age: 40-60
- Gender: both male and female
- MMSE \>24
- Modified Ashworth scale \<3
- Stable patient (Good sitting balance )
- No visual-spatial hemineglect.
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable patient
- Uncooperative patient
- Orthopaedic deformity
- Aphasia
- Visual infection
- Joint pain (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, ankle)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah International University
Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
Related Publications (6)
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, Elkind MS, George MG, Hamdan AD, Higashida RT, Hoh BL, Janis LS, Kase CS, Kleindorfer DO, Lee JM, Moseley ME, Peterson ED, Turan TN, Valderrama AL, Vinters HV; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064-89. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca. Epub 2013 May 7.
PMID: 23652265BACKGROUNDOwolabi MO, Akarolo-Anthony S, Akinyemi R, Arnett D, Gebregziabher M, Jenkins C, Tiwari H, Arulogun O, Akpalu A, Sarfo FS, Obiako R, Owolabi L, Sagoe K, Melikam S, Adeoye AM, Lackland D, Ovbiagele B; Members of the H3Africa Consortium. The burden of stroke in Africa: a glance at the present and a glimpse into the future. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015 Mar-Apr;26(2 Suppl 1):S27-38. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2015-038.
PMID: 25962945BACKGROUNDYang Q, Tong X, Schieb L, Vaughan A, Gillespie C, Wiltz JL, King SC, Odom E, Merritt R, Hong Y, George MG. Vital Signs: Recent Trends in Stroke Death Rates - United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Sep 8;66(35):933-939. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6635e1.
PMID: 28880858BACKGROUNDScheid A, Choppin PW. Two disulfide-linked polypeptide chains constitute the active F protein of paramyxoviruses. Virology. 1977 Jul 1;80(1):54-66. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90380-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 195398BACKGROUNDShimodozono M, Noma T, Nomoto Y, Hisamatsu N, Kamada K, Miyata R, Matsumoto S, Ogata A, Etoh S, Basford JR, Kawahira K. Benefits of a repetitive facilitative exercise program for the upper paretic extremity after subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 May;27(4):296-305. doi: 10.1177/1545968312465896. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
PMID: 23213077BACKGROUNDRiggs BL, Jowsey J, Kelly PJ, Arnaud CD. Role of hormonal factors in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Isr J Med Sci. 1976 Jul;12(7):615-9.
PMID: 972016BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aruba Saeed, PHD*
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2020
First Posted
July 13, 2020
Study Start
July 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 15, 2019
Study Completion
January 15, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share