Study Stopped
The principal investigator left the hospital
Circadian & Homeostatic Synchronization Effect on Waking Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
Synch Fit
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sleep benefit (SB) consists of a spontaneous, transient and inconsistent improvement of the mobility occurring on morning awakening in approximately 40% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, before taking the first morning dose of dopaminergic drugs. The SB could represent a pathway for the development of new therapeutic strategies for motor symptoms in PD. Being a seemingly unpredictable phenomenon and a great variability daily, inter- and intra-subject, the SB study requires multiple and repeated assessments of mobility for several days. An experimental home setting would be optimal for this purpose in terms of cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability. In addition, since the extent and nature of SB have not been well characterized so far, and the magnitude of its variability is unknown, a reliable assessment method, independent of observers and situation, the SB is a requirement of further research in this area. A recently developed technique combining machine learning algorithms with wireless portable sensors (accelerometers and gyroscopes) and software applications could be particularly promising for characterizing the complexity and multiplicity of SBs in. With this technique, repeated and multiple assessments of mobility can be performed in the homes of patients without the constant presence of a researcher. This approach offers several advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of study protocols by patients. It also improves the ecological validity of subjective and objective estimates of mobility in these patients. The investigators chose to conduct this preliminary study on patients with PD rather than on healthy subjects, because SB is a phenomenon that has been described so far only in this population. Investigators also consider that the feasibility of the study will depend mainly on the patients' ability to move and the context of their own illness. SB is a phenomenon induced by sleep. The propensity and timing of sleep depend on the coordinated interaction of the duration of the previous awakening (homeostatic process) and a circadian signal (circadian process). In order to better understand SB, it is necessary to study the reciprocal influences of the circadian and homeostatic process. Investigators have devised a new paradigm to "shift" the circadian process phase around the homeostatic process, maintained under constant conditions, in order to observe the effect of the synchronism or desynchronization of these two processes on the awakening mobility of patients with an MP. This experimental approach was approved by Professor Aleksandar Videnovic (Harvard University School of Medicine, USA), opinion leader on circadian rhythmicity in the MP and scientific collaborator of this study. As a first step, the investigators plan to implement a technology-assisted home-based methodology, to validate it in PD patients and to verify the logistic feasibility of this method-assisted approach in a small group of patients, in order to to be able to apply this paradigm in larger scientific projects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 13, 2020
October 1, 2019
2 years
October 14, 2019
July 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Validation of the objective metrics of mobility
The validity of the mobility assessment by Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) wearable sensors will be verified. It will be defined as the accuracy of the machine learning algorithm to predict patients' motor status compared to the motor status assessed at clinical examination by means of the MDSUPDRS- III scale and the Fit test. Prediction by machine learning will be compared with the MDS-UPDRS-III total score and with the 3.14 item (global clinical impression of mobility) of the same scale. The patients will be asked to perform all the motor tasks of the MDS-UPDRS-III scale and the finger tapping test (Fit test) with both hands wearing the IMU system.
12 months
Objective and subjective mobility
Prediction of mobility by machine learning based on data from IMU wearable sensors; finger tapping test; VAS motor
12 months
Sleep and sleepiness
Measured by sleep diary, SSS
12 months
Cognition (electronic Stroop test)
12 months
Emotional state
Measured by Visual Analog Scale(VAS) mood/anxiety
12 months
Fatigue
Measured by VAS fatigue
12 months
Circadian phase
Continuously for skin body temperature and repeated samples (every 30' for a total of 9 samples, in the evening around the bed time, for salivary DLMO
12 months
Sleep homeostasis (SWA)
Calculated based on the EEG recording acquired by means of nocturnal portable polysomnography.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Chronotype
12 months
Sleep habits, sleep and wake-related symptoms, sleep quality
12 months
PD-specific sleep and wake-associated symptoms
12 months
Daytime symptoms of bad or insufficient sleep
12 months
Modification of mobility on morning awakening
12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients affected with idiopathic Parkinson Disease
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The validity of the mobility assessment by IMU wearable sensors will be verified in Work Package 3. It will be defined as the accuracy of the machine learning algorithm to predict patients' motor status compared to the motor status assessed at clinical examination by means of the MDS-UPDRS-III scale and the Fit test. Prediction by machine learning will be compared with the MDS-UPDRS-III total score and with the 3.14 item (global clinical impression of mobility) of the same scale. The patients will be asked to perform all the motor tasks of the MDS-UPDRS-III scale and the finger tapping test (Fit test) with both hands wearing the IMU system. A subset of minimal motor tasks allowing good prediction of the patient's motor status by the machine learning algorithm will then be selected for Work Package 4.
Baseline Phase B1: Observation phase: 1-week wrist actigraphy and sleep diary to assess habitual activity/rest routines. B2: Nocturnal sleep consolidation phase: 2 weeks: timed light exposure, constant sleep/wake routine and sleep restriction of 1 hour/night (based on habitual activity).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 18 years old;
- Patients affected with idiopathic PD, of both sexes;
- Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2 to 4 in the "on" state;
- Stable antiparkinsonian and/or psychotropic medications for at least 4 weeks prior to study screening;
- Reliable partner/caregiver to assist the patient during the study procedures;
- Affiliated person or beneficiary of a social security scheme;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years old;
- Atypical parkinsonian syndromes;
- Dementia;
- Treatment with extended-release dopaminergic drugs (excluding extended release levodopa given no later than 6 hours before the habitual bedtime);
- Use of hypno-sedative drugs or stimulants;
- Use of antidepressants unless on a stable dose for at least 3 months;
- Travel through 2 time zones within 90 days prior to study screening;
- Visual abnormalities that may interfere with light therapy, such as significant cataracts, narrow angle glaucoma or blindness;
- Any other medical condition potentially interfering with the assessment of mobility (e.g. limb amputation, post-stroke paralysis, severe osteo-articular condition);
- Any condition limiting the capability of the subject to understand the task to be performed at home by the patient himself (e.g. aphasia, oligophrenia);
- Severely altered physical and/or psychological health which, according to, the investigator, could affect the participant's compliance of the study;
- Inadequate housing conditions to perform home assessments;
- Patients refusing to participate in the study;
- Patients under legal guardianship or curatorship, pregnant and breastfeeding women, women of child-bearing age, persons in emergency situations;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Martinique
Fort-de-France, 97200, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pietro Luca RATTI, MD
CHU de Martinique
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2019
First Posted
July 13, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
April 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share