Lay Health Worker Expanded Intervention in Community Oncology Practices
1 other identifier
interventional
416
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Undertreated patient symptoms and resulting acute care use require approaches that improve symptom-burden. Previously a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention was developed for patients with cancer. In pilot work, the intervention was associated with improvements in patient symptom burden and reductions in healthcare use and costs of care at the end of life. This intervention will be expanded across several clinics to evaluate the impact of the LHW intervention on with cancer and the LHW will be trained to refer patients to palliative care. This randomized intervention will evaluate the effect on healthcare use, total costs, palliative care and hospice referral.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2024
CompletedApril 27, 2025
April 1, 2025
4 years
July 4, 2020
April 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
% of patients with Emergency Department Visit within 12-months after patient enrollment (Chart Review)
Emergency Department use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of the % of patients with emergency department visits between study arms.
12 months after patient enrollment
% of patients with Hospitalization Visits within 12 months after patient enrollment (Chart Review)
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment. We will evaluate comparisons of hospitalizations between the two study arms.
12 months after patient enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
% of patients with a Hospice Consult within 12-months after patient enrollment (Chart Review)
12 months after patient enrollment
Total Health Care Costs (Claims Review)
12 months after patient enrollment
% of patients with an Acute Care Facility Death (Chart Review)
30 days prior to death for patients who died at 12-months follow-up
% of patients with Emergency Department Visit in the last 30 days of life (Chart Review)
30 days prior to death for patients who died at 12-months follow-up
% of patients with Hospitalization Visits in the last 30 days of life (Chart Review)
30 days prior to death for patients who died at 12-months follow-up
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group Arm
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized into the intervention will be assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention. The intervention includes: proactive symptom assessments for patients for up to 12-months.
Behavioral:Program participants
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group arm will receive usual care as provided by their local oncologists.
Interventions
The intervention is a 12-month telephonic program in which a lay health worker (LHW), supervised on-site by a registered nurse practitioner (RNP), assessed patient symptoms after diagnosis using the validated Edmonton Symptom The intervention is a 12-month telephonic program in which a lay health worker (LHW), supervised on-site by a registered nurse practitioner (RNP), assessed patient symptoms after diagnosis using the validated Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) (cite) with the frequency of symptom assessment varying based on patient risk.
Usual care as provided by local oncologists
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed or relapsed cancer diagnosis.
- years or older
- Diagnosis of relapse or progressive disease (any cancer diagnosis) as identified by imaging or biopsy and confirmed by physician.
- Must have capacity to verbally consent
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to consent to the study due to lack of capacity as documented by the referring physician.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Tucson, Arizona, 85710, United States
The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Henderson, Nevada, 89052, United States
Related Publications (1)
Patel MI, Voskanyan M, Agajanian H, Agajanian R, Podnos Y, Milstein A. A Lay Health Worker-Led Symptom Intervention and Acute Care Use in Older Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Dec 30:e2523403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.23403. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41468027DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manali I Patel, MD MPH MS
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2020
First Posted
July 9, 2020
Study Start
October 5, 2020
Primary Completion
October 17, 2024
Study Completion
October 17, 2024
Last Updated
April 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share