A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study About Internal Fixation Using FNS Versus MCS for Femoral Neck Fracture
1 other identifier
interventional
290
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective multicenter cohort study is to compare the post-operative implant failure rate between the patients with femoral neck fracture (AO classification 31-B) using Femoral Neck System (FNS) versus Multiple Cancellous Screws (MCS) at 2-year follow up. The patients are divided into the FNS group and the MCS group according to the internal fixation they choose. The internal fixation failure rate (IFFR) and differences in fracture prognosis of the two groups will be compared. Obtain clinical data of FNS in the Chinese population, and verify the safety and efficacy of FNS for patients with femoral neck fracture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedOctober 22, 2021
June 1, 2021
3 years
June 28, 2020
October 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Internal fixation failure rate
defined as the total incidence of internal plant cut-out and fracture.
from operation to 2-year follow-up after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants with Bone nonunion
from operation to 2-year follow-up after the surgery
Harris hip score
from operation to 2-year follow-up after the surgery
operation time
intraoperative
The times of intraoperative fluoroscopy
intraoperative
Number of Participants with Postoperative adverse events
from operation to 2-year follow-up after the surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Synthes Femoral Neck System (FNS)
EXPERIMENTALSynthes Femoral Neck System (FNS) was developed with the intention to combine advantages of DHS (dynamic hip screw) and MCS (multiple cancellous screw). The FNS implants consist of plates, bolts, locking screws and antirotating-screws. The plate consists of a small base plate with one or two locking holes and a barrel portion. The barrel allows for gliding of the head elements while restricting rotation around the head-neck axis, so FNS is a fixed-angle gliding fixation device that allows for controlled collapse of the femoral neck, like DHS. The FNS was also designed to minimize implant footprint on the bone with its compact design, like MCS. Furthermore, the FNS was designed to reduce the length of incision necessary for implant insertion when compared to DHS. This new concept of femoral neck fracture fixation still emphasizes the biology of fracture healing by initial fracture compression.
Multiple cancellous screws (MCS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMultiple cancellous screws (MCS) fixation is the most common and classic method to deal with femoral neck fractures which is less invasive and retains more viable bone, compared with dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation that appears biomechanically more stable. In this study, three cancellous screws with an inverted triangle pattern are used to fix the fracture of femoral neck.
Interventions
perform preoperative preparation, intraoperative operation and internal fixation implantation according to the instructions provided in the product packaging.
three cancellous screws with an inverted triangle pattern are used to fix the fracture of femoral neck.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Patients with unilateral femoral neck fractures that will be treated with internal fixation
- According to AO fracture classification, subjects with the fracture type (31-B)
- Subjects (with the help of relatives) can understand the informed documents and patient questionnaires.
- Subjects (with the help of relatives) voluntarily provide written informed consent to participate in the clinical study and authorize the transfer of their information to the sponsor.
- The investigator believes that the subject can understand the clinical study, is willing and able to complete all research procedures and follow-up visits and can cooperate with the research procedures.
- In-label use of the MCS and FNS.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject does not provide voluntary consent to participate in the study.
- The researcher believes that the subjects have conditions that affect the participation and follow-up of this study. (for example, the patient lives in a remote area or has difficulty in going back to the hospital for follow-up or does not cooperate with the medical guidance and suggestions of the surgeon.)
- The subjects were pregnant or lactating women.
- The researchers believe that the subjects have psychological disorders, which may affect the treatment outcome.
- Garden classification III and IV of femoral neck fracture patients older than 65 years
- Concurrent hip osteoarthritis.
- Fractures where the operative treatment will occur more than three weeks after the primary injury
- Patients combined with other bone fractures.
- Pathological fracture (e.g., primary or metastatic tumor)
- Serious soft tissue injury, judged by the investigator, will impact the union of the fracture, combined open fractures, vascular injury, and combined osteofascial compartment syndrome
- Multiple systemic injuries judged by researchers not suitable for enrollment.
- Revision surgeries (for example, due to malunion, nonunion or infection)
- Concurrent medical conditions judged by researchers not suitable for enrollment, such as: metabolic bone disease, post-polio syndrome, poor bone quality, prior history of poor fracture healing, etc
- Patients with anaesthetic and surgical contraindications
- Patients known to be allergic to implant components
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Peking University Third Hospitallead
- Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong Universitycollaborator
- Beijing Jishuitan Hospitalcollaborator
- Shanghai 6th People's Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Hospitalcollaborator
- The Fuzhou No 2 Hospitalcollaborator
- Xi'an Honghui Hospitalcollaborator
- West China Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fang Zhou, MD
Peking University Third Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2020
First Posted
July 8, 2020
Study Start
September 30, 2021
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
October 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share