NCT04461405

Brief Summary

In 2016, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) published its first-ever recommendations for integrating medical and psychosocial care for patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DMII) and common mental and behavioral health (MH/BH) problems. In the United States, 30 million people live with DMII, and the majority receive care in primary care settings. By implementing the ADA recommendations, primary care practices will help patients better manage their MH/BH needs, meet recommended goals for DMII management, and reduce the risk of adverse outcomes. Making these recommendations a routine part of practice is a major change, and it is critical to understand how best to implement the ADA recommendations and test its effectiveness in the real world. The pilot study builds on a series of prior studies to refine and pilot test a package of implementation strategies - called INTEGRATE-D - to support practices in implementing the ADA recommendations for integrated DMII care. INTEGRATE-D combines the following evidence-based implementation strategies: (1) electronic health record (EHR)-based support - to help align EHR use with ADA recommendations and enable screening for depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, cognitive impairment, and self-management, and support identifying and tracking progress on patient treatments and goals; (2) Audit and feedback - which involves assisting practices in accessing clinically relevant, actionable data reports to inform measurement and identification of care gaps in DMII and behavioral health care; (3) Skill-building resources - including training on ADA-recommended care; and (4) Facilitation - to help implement the above strategies and tailor the intervention so that practice work on the subset of areas where practices are ready to change to align care with ADA recommendations. The study aims are Aim 1: Refine the INTEGRATE-D intervention by incorporating the preferences of stakeholders. In partnership with patients, primary care key stakeholders and experts, compile and refine the package of implementation strategies in the INTEGRATE-D intervention. Aim 2: Demonstrate feasibility, acceptability, and estimate cost. Conduct a mixed-method, pre-post pilot comparing two practices that receive the INTEGRATE-D intervention to two control practices that receive training materials only.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
294

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 26, 2020

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2022

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 7, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

June 26, 2020

Results QC Date

May 30, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptability of Intervention

    A post-intervention four-item survey that evaluates the extent to which the intervention meets practice members' approval, is appealing and is liked and welcomed. The items were assessed on a Likert scale, ranging from -2 to 2 (i.e., completely disagree to completely agree, with 0 indicating neutrality). Composite scores were created by averaging scores for the four individual items. The scale range is from -2 (minimum) to +2 (maximum), where higher values represent a better outcome (more approval).

    At 15 months, post-intervention

  • Feasibility of the Intervention

    A post-intervention four-item survey that evaluates the extent to which the intervention is implementable, seems possible, seems doable, and seems easy to use. The items were assessed on a Likert scale, ranging from -2 to 2 (i.e., completely disagree to completely agree, with 0 indicating neutrality). Composite scores were created by averaging scores for the four individual items. The scale range is from -2 (minimum) to +2 (maximum), where higher values represent a better outcome (more approval).

    At 15 months, post-intervention

  • Appropriateness of Intervention

    A post-intervention four-item survey that evaluates the extent to which the intervention meets practice members' approval, is appealing and is liked and welcomed. The items were assessed on a Likert scale, ranging from -2 to 2 (i.e., completely disagree to completely agree, with 0 indicating neutrality). Composite scores were created by averaging scores for the four individual items. The scale range is from -2 (minimum) to +2 (maximum), where higher values represent a better outcome (more approval).

    At 15 months, post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Hemoglobin A1c

    Baseline (pre-intervention) and 15-months (post-intervention).

  • Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Baseline (pre-intervention) and 15-months (post-intervention).

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

INTEGRATE-D is a step-by-step blueprint that will assist practices with employing American Diabetes Association recommendations for integrating medical and psychosocial care. INTEGRATE-D consists of a set of implementation strategies that enable clinical teams to put evidence-based care in place. The intervention consists of training and education; audit and feedback materials; a facilitation implementation protocol; and health information technology support materials.

Behavioral: INTEGRATE-D

Control Arm

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care

Interventions

INTEGRATE-DBEHAVIORAL

INTEGRATE-D provides primary care practices with evidence-based training and support which includes: (1) Electronic health record (EHR)-based support-to help align EHR use with ADA recommendations and enable screening for depression, anxiety, DM distress, cognitive impairment, and self-management, and support identifying and tracking progress on patient treatments and goals; (2) Audit and feedback which involves assisting practices in accessing clinically relevant, actionable data reports to inform measurement and identification of care gaps in DMII and behavioral health care; (3) Skill-building resources including training on ADA-recommended care; and (4) Facilitation-to help implement the above strategies and the practice changes needed to align care with ADA recommendations.

Intervention Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary care practices are affiliated with the Oregon Rural Practice-Based Network (ORPRN), at time of recruitment.
  • Primary care practices must be located in Oregon.
  • Primary care practices have more than 100 adult patients aged 18 years or older with an electronic health record-based diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Melitus (DMII).
  • Patients are 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients have an electronic health record-based diagnosis of DMII.
  • Patients were seen by an ORPRN practice at least once in the 15 months prior to the start of intervention and once during the intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Deborah Cohen
Organization
Oregon Health & Science University

Study Officials

  • Deborah Cohen, PhD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vice Chair for Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2020

First Posted

July 8, 2020

Study Start

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion

July 1, 2022

Study Completion

July 1, 2022

Last Updated

February 7, 2025

Results First Posted

February 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations