Carbon Dioxide Versus Iodine Contrast for Endovascular Revascularization of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
64
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
From July 2015 to July 2018, 64 patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease who were eligible for endovascular treatment and lacked contraindications to either iodine contrast or carbon dioxide (CO2) were randomized into the carbon dioxide CO2 group(32) or iodine contrast medium(ICM) group(32) were subjected to aortoiliac angioplasty. The primary outcome was the quality of image as the sole contrast agent used in interventions. The secondary outcomes were technical success rate and the safety of procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2020
CompletedJuly 7, 2020
July 1, 2020
4 years
June 30, 2020
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
quality of image as the sole contrast agent to perform the needed interventions: Likert rating scale
Imaging from all cases were analyzed on conclusion of the study. The images were reviewed by two independent observers (radiologists with \> 5 years of experience in performing endovascular procedures) blinded to treatment arm. Image quality was assessed using Likert rating scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) for each image.
on conclusion of patient recruitment , image quality was aseessed within 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
technical success rate
immediate post operative
Incidence of Procedure-related complications .
1year follow up
Study Arms (2)
CO2 group (treatment arm)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm included 32 patients who were randomized for using CO2 as the contrast medium for aortoiliac angiolplasty.
ICM group (control arm)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm involved 32 patients who were randomized for using iodine contrast medium (ICM) for aortoiliac angiolplasty.
Interventions
In the CO2 arm we used manual injection of CO2 from a medicinal CO2 cylinder connected to a particle filter. Under water aspiration was used to prevent air contamination. Using a twenty mls syringe the required amount of CO2was aspirated using a three way tap and was followed my aspirating 3mls of saline to provide a fluid barrier. In the ICM arm the injection of contrast was done using 10-ml syringes with 5 mls of iodinated contrast media and 5 mls of saline solution per injection. The ICM used in all cases was Omnipaque 300 (Iohexol), a nonionic low osmolar contrast commonly in use in both hospitals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with aortoiliac arteries atherosclerotic disease (with arterial atherosclerotic disease classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A, B and C, (classified by CT angiography)
- Patients with good distal runoff
- Patients suitable for either types of contrast ICM or CO2 (No history of allergy to contrast and normal kidney functions)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with TASC D aortoiliac lesions
- Patients requiring femoral endartectomy
- Patient s with significant multilevel distal disease
- Patients suffering from severe chronic obstructive lung disease, chronic kidney failure, heart failure, or pregnancy.
- Patients younger than 18 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
de Almeida Mendes C, de Arruda Martins A, Teivelis MP, Kuzniec S, Nishinari K, Krutman M, Halpern H, Wolosker N. Carbon dioxide is a cost-effective contrast medium to guide revascularization of TASC A and TASC B femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;28(6):1473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
PMID: 24704050BACKGROUNDFujihara M, Kawasaki D, Shintani Y, Fukunaga M, Nakama T, Koshida R, Higashimori A, Yokoi Y; CO2 Angiography Registry Investigators. Endovascular therapy by CO2 angiography to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective multicenter trial of CO2 angiography registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;85(5):870-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25722. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
PMID: 25380326BACKGROUNDSharafuddin MJ, Marjan AE. Current status of carbon dioxide angiography. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):618-637. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.446.
PMID: 28735955BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients who agreed were asked to sign an informed consent. After patient data input was done, randomization was computer generated in the vascular surgery department in Zagazig university hospitals. Computer generated random numbers were created with the use of randomly permuted blocks with two block sizes; after which they were secured in consecutive numbered envelopes and group allocation was independent of time and person delivering the treatment. Single blinding was used to recruit the patients.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate professorof vascular surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2020
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 15, 2020
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share