Treatment of TASC C and D Aortoiliac Lesions
Comparison of Open Surgery, Hybrid and Endovascular Repair for Complex TASC C/D Aortoiliac Lesions
1 other identifier
observational
900
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The treatment of patients with complex aortoiliac disease (AID), classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society consensus II (TASC) class C and D, presents a dilemma for vascular surgeons. Current guidelines recommend either open surgical reconstruction (OR), hybrid repair (HR) combining iliac stenting with femoral endarterectomy, or total endovascular repair (ER). While traditional OR with aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) is associated with excellent long term patency results, it is associated with significant perioperative morbidity with some studies citing mortality rates of up to 4-8%. The advancement of endovascular techniques has led to many trials suggesting that endovascular management of TASC II C and D lesions is a potential alternative treatment to open strategies mainly in the subset of patients with high surgical risk, given the substantially less perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to OR. Aim: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the short, mid-, and long-term results of open repair, hybrid and endovascular repair in the treatment patients with complex, TASC C and D, aortoiliac lesions. Methodology: This is a retrospective cohort study planning to include vascular surgery centers from the following countries: Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Serbia. Data will be collected on demographics, baseline comorbidities, anatomy and morphology of the aortoiliac and femoral bifurcation disease, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data. Propensity score analysis will be performed by matching open repair patients in all three groups (open, hybrid, and endovascular repair) controlling for demographics, baseline comorbidities, anatomical and morphological data. Endpoints: Primary endpoints are all-cause mortality and the major adverse limb events (major amputation - below and above the knee, new onset acute limb ischaemia, reintervention of the treated arterial segment). The secondary endpoints are the 30-day complications and primary patency.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 23, 2024
August 1, 2024
1 year
February 2, 2024
August 21, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
All-cause mortality
Overall mortality in all treatment arms
Short-term (30-days), mid-term (between 1-5 years), long-term (more than 5 years)
Major adverse limb event (MALE)
Major amputations (below and above the knee), new onset acute limb ischaemia of the treated extremity, and reintervention on the already treated arterial segment (aortoiliac segment and femoral bifurcation, excluding distal infrainguinal disease).
Short-term (30-days), mid-term (between 1-5 years), long-term (more than 5 years)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
30-day complication
Short-term (30-days)
Primary patency
Short-term (30-days), mid-term (between 1-5 years), long-term (more than 5 years)
Study Arms (3)
Open surgery
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing open surgery: aortobifemoral bypass, crossover bypass, axillobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac endarterectomy, iliofemoral bypass
Hybrid repair
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing simultaneous open surgical femoral artery reconstruction (endarterectomy, bypass, profundoplasty) and stenting of the iliac axis
Endovascular repair
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing total endovascular repair using different material: bare metal stents (self and balloon expandable), stent-grafts (self and balloon expandable), covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB), simple plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)
Interventions
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing open surgery: aortobifemoral bypass, crossover bypass, axillobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac endarterectomy, iliofemoral bypass
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing simultaneous open surgical femoral artery reconstruction (endarterectomy, bypass, profundoplasty) and stenting of the iliac axis
Patients with complex TASC C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing total endovascular repair using different material: bare metal stents (self and balloon expandable), stent-grafts (self and balloon expandable), covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB), simple plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)
Eligibility Criteria
Patient with peripheral arterial disease according to the Rutherford classification system (with claudications and chronic-limb threatening ischemia) undergoing one of the three available treatment option: * Open surgery (aortobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac endarterectomy, iliacofemoral bypass, crossover bypass, axillobifemoral bypass) * Hybrid repair (iliac artery stenting and common femoral artery reconstruction) * Endovascular repair (bare metal stenting, using covered stents, and plain balloon angioplasty)
You may qualify if:
- All patients (over 18 years of age) with a history of atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease treated between 1st January 2015 and 1st January 2022
- All management strategies will be included (endovascular, hybrid, and open)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients who are under 18 years of age
- Patients who have acute limb ischemia or acute on chronic ischemia
- Non-atherosclerotic origin of disease: cyclist disease, trauma, dissection
- Patients who were treated in conservative manner
- Patients who underwent primary major amputation
- Patients with limited life expectancy (less than 2 years)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Clinical Centre of Serbialead
- University of Belgradecollaborator
- University of Triestecollaborator
- Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.collaborator
- Clinical Center Nis, University of Niscollaborator
- Clinical Center Novi Sad, University of Novi Sadcollaborator
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinjecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Related Publications (5)
Antonello M, Squizzato F, Bassini S, Porcellato L, Grego F, Piazza M. Open repair versus endovascular treatment of complex aortoiliac lesions in low risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1155-1165.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
PMID: 30850298RESULTMayor J, Branco BC, Chung J, Montero-Baker MF, Kougias P, Mills JL Sr, Gilani R. Outcome Comparison between Open and Endovascular Management of TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:65-71.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
PMID: 31394230RESULTStarodubtsev V, Mitrofanov V, Ignatenko P, Gostev A, Preece R, Rabtsun A, Saaya S, Popova I, Karpenko A. Editor's Choice - Hybrid vs. Open Surgical Reconstruction for Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease: A Prospective Randomised Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;63(4):557-565. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
PMID: 35283003RESULTSuzuki K, Mizutani Y, Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, Hirano K, Koshida R, Kamoi D, Tazaki J, Higashitani M, Shintani Y, Yamaoka T, Okazaki S, Suematsu N, Tsuchiya T, Miyashita Y, Shinozaki N, Takahashi H, Inoue N. Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Therapy for Aortoiliac TASC D Lesions. Angiology. 2017 Jan;68(1):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0003319716638005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
PMID: 26980775RESULTSquizzato F, D'Oria M, Bozza R, Porcellato L, Grego F, Lepidi S. Propensity-Matched Comparison of Endovascular versus Open Reconstruction for TASC-II C/D AortoIliac Occlusive Disease. A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience with Self-Expanding Covered Stents. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.139. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32927036RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joao Rocha Neves, MD PhD
Univeristy of Porto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2024
First Posted
February 12, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08