NCT04455945

Brief Summary

Following colorectal surgery, many patients face a combination of physical and emotional problems for a long period of time. Symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and disturbed bowel and sexual function, as well as problems in social and role functioning, inevitably affect the patients' well-being. Therefore, evaluation of the self-reported quality of life (QoL) is becoming increasingly important in clinical trials. The investigators aimed to compare long term health related life quality (HRQoL) results of laparoscopic approach with open approach in patients with sphincter preserving resections for rectal cancer at a single-center.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 19, 2020

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 2, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

rectal cancer surgerylife qualityquestionnaire

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Age

    Years

    Before surgery

  • Gender

    Male/Female

    Before surgery

  • BMI

    kg/m²

    Before surgery

  • ASA

    I, II, III, IV

    Before surgery

  • Tumor Localization

    Upper/Middle/Low

    During the operation

  • Pathologic Stage

    1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C

    up to 10 days after surgery

  • Complications

    yes/no

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional scales

    Global/Physical/Role/Cognitive/Social functioning. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.

    During one week after surgery

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Symptom scales

    Fatigue/Nausea and vomiting/Pain/Dyspnoea/Insomnia/Appetite loss/Constipation/Diarrhoea/Financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.

    During one week after surgery

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Functional scales

    Body Image/Future projections/Weight/Sexual interest. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.

    During one year after surgery

  • European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Symptom scales

    Urinary frequency/Blood and mucus in stool/Stool frequency/Urinary incontinence/Dysuria/Abdominal pain/Buttock pain/Bloating/Dry mouth/Hair loss/Taste/Flatulence/Faecal incontinence/Sore skin/Embarrassment/Impotence/Dyspareunia. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.

    During one year after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Open

Patients with open surgery for rectal cancer planned in our department.

Procedure: Open Rectal cancer surgery

Laparoscopic

Patients with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer planned in our department.

Procedure: Laparoscopic Rectal cancer surgery

Interventions

Open sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer

Open

Laparoscopic sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer

Laparoscopic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The patients who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) for rectal cancer in our department.

You may qualify if:

  • patients who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) for rectal cancer in our department.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patients whose all oncological treatments had not been completed at least 6 months ago
  • The patients with ASA IV score
  • The patients with previous abdominal surgery
  • The patients who had developed major surgical complications (such as anastomosis leakage, requiring re-laparotomy, evisceration)
  • The patients who underwent a new abdominal surgery except for stoma closure
  • The patients with local recurrence or distant metastases
  • The patients who still had a stoma
  • The patients who did not want to take part in the study
  • The patients who missed in the follow-up period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Tranining and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34890, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angeras U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Furst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1746. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10280. Epub 2016 Jul 6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27801927BACKGROUND
  • D'Ambrosio G, Paganini AM, Balla A, Quaresima S, Ursi P, Bruzzone P, Picchetto A, Mattei FI, Lezoche E. Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):504-511. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4232-8. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

    PMID: 26045097BACKGROUND
  • D'Ambrosio G, Picchetto A, Campo S, Palma R, Panetta C, De Laurentis F, La Rocca S, Lezoche E. Quality of life in patients with loco-regional rectal cancer after ELRR by TEM versus VLS TME after nChRT: long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):941-948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6583-4. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

    PMID: 30421081BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Selcuk Kaya, MD

    Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2020

First Posted

July 2, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2018

Study Completion

June 19, 2020

Last Updated

July 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations