Quality of Life After Rectal Cancer Surgery
Comparison of Quality of Life Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Following colorectal surgery, many patients face a combination of physical and emotional problems for a long period of time. Symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and disturbed bowel and sexual function, as well as problems in social and role functioning, inevitably affect the patients' well-being. Therefore, evaluation of the self-reported quality of life (QoL) is becoming increasingly important in clinical trials. The investigators aimed to compare long term health related life quality (HRQoL) results of laparoscopic approach with open approach in patients with sphincter preserving resections for rectal cancer at a single-center.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2020
CompletedJuly 2, 2020
July 1, 2020
2 years
June 19, 2020
July 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Age
Years
Before surgery
Gender
Male/Female
Before surgery
BMI
kg/m²
Before surgery
ASA
I, II, III, IV
Before surgery
Tumor Localization
Upper/Middle/Low
During the operation
Pathologic Stage
1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C
up to 10 days after surgery
Complications
yes/no
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Functional scales
Global/Physical/Role/Cognitive/Social functioning. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.
During one week after surgery
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Symptom scales
Fatigue/Nausea and vomiting/Pain/Dyspnoea/Insomnia/Appetite loss/Constipation/Diarrhoea/Financial difficulties. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.
During one week after surgery
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Functional scales
Body Image/Future projections/Weight/Sexual interest. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score on a functional scale indicates better functioning.
During one year after surgery
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal Cancer 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) Symptom scales
Urinary frequency/Blood and mucus in stool/Stool frequency/Urinary incontinence/Dysuria/Abdominal pain/Buttock pain/Bloating/Dry mouth/Hair loss/Taste/Flatulence/Faecal incontinence/Sore skin/Embarrassment/Impotence/Dyspareunia. All scales and single-item measurements range from 0 to 100. A higher score for a symptom scale / item indicates a higher symptomatology and problem level.
During one year after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Open
Patients with open surgery for rectal cancer planned in our department.
Laparoscopic
Patients with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer planned in our department.
Interventions
Laparoscopic sphincter preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Eligibility Criteria
The patients who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) for rectal cancer in our department.
You may qualify if:
- patients who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) for rectal cancer in our department.
You may not qualify if:
- The patients whose all oncological treatments had not been completed at least 6 months ago
- The patients with ASA IV score
- The patients with previous abdominal surgery
- The patients who had developed major surgical complications (such as anastomosis leakage, requiring re-laparotomy, evisceration)
- The patients who underwent a new abdominal surgery except for stoma closure
- The patients with local recurrence or distant metastases
- The patients who still had a stoma
- The patients who did not want to take part in the study
- The patients who missed in the follow-up period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Tranining and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34890, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Angeras U, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Furst A, Bonjer J, Haglind E. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1746. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10280. Epub 2016 Jul 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 27801927BACKGROUNDD'Ambrosio G, Paganini AM, Balla A, Quaresima S, Ursi P, Bruzzone P, Picchetto A, Mattei FI, Lezoche E. Quality of life in non-early rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and endoluminal loco-regional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):504-511. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4232-8. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
PMID: 26045097BACKGROUNDD'Ambrosio G, Picchetto A, Campo S, Palma R, Panetta C, De Laurentis F, La Rocca S, Lezoche E. Quality of life in patients with loco-regional rectal cancer after ELRR by TEM versus VLS TME after nChRT: long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):941-948. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6583-4. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PMID: 30421081BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Selcuk Kaya, MD
Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2020
First Posted
July 2, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
June 19, 2020
Last Updated
July 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share