Comparing Different Surgical Techniques for Coverage of Pressure Ulcer
A Retrospective Study Comparing Failure and Complications Rates Between Propeller Flap and Random Flap for Pressure Ulcer
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery department of Montpellier was born out of the Wound and Healing department, the first unit of this type to be created in Europe. The investigators quickly became the national leader in the management of pressure ulcers, especially in people with spinal cord injuries. Our expertise has evolved over time as well as our surgical techniques for covering ulcers, gradually over time the investigators have gone from " random " flaps to " propeller " flaps, more reliable in terms of vascularization and more logical in terms of force distribution and skin tension. The investigators found subjectively that the rate of complications was lower for the helical flaps. The investigators therefore seek to confirm this trend through a retrospective study on patients operated on in the department between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2021
CompletedDecember 29, 2020
December 1, 2020
5 months
June 22, 2020
December 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Failure rate
Comparing failure rates between the two surgical techniques
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications rate
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Propeller flaps
Patients who undergone propeller flap surgery
Random flaps
Patients who undergone random flap surgery
Interventions
Flap covering for pressure ulcer
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with sacral, trochanteric or ischiatic pressure ulcer
You may qualify if:
- Major Patient
- Patient with trochanteric, ischiatic or sacral pressure ulcer
- Patient who undergone flap surgery for pressure ulcer between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2019
You may not qualify if:
- Other loss of substance than pressure ulcer
- Combined covering with a random flap and a propeller flap
- Surgical revision of a flap without a new flap
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Uhmontpellier
Montpellier, 34295, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Farid BEKARA, MD
University Hospital, Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2020
First Posted
June 25, 2020
Study Start
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 20, 2020
Study Completion
January 20, 2021
Last Updated
December 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12