NCT04408495

Brief Summary

Controversies remain concerning the best intraoperative mechanical ventilation regimen for major cardiac surgery. While the use of intra operative low tidal volumes is now standard practice, the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of recruitment maneuvers (RM) remain controversial. The aim of this study is to compare two regimens of intraoperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients at risk of postoperative pulmonary complications

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
441

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2020

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 8, 2021

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 16, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4.2 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

recruitment maneuversPostoperative pulmonary complicationsPeepCardiac surgeryMortality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of major pulmonary complications and death

    Major pulmonary complications, defined as prolonged mechanical ventilation \>24h post-operatively, pneumonia (defined according to the 2017 French guidelines) or reintubation for any cause within 7 post-operative days, or death

    28 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (27)

  • Rate of patients with hypotension

    intraoperative period

  • Evaluate the postoperative blood gases

    30 minutes after extubation

  • Evaluate the postoperative blood gases

    30 minutes after extubation

  • Evaluate the postoperative blood gases

    30 minutes after extubation

  • Evaluate the postoperative blood gases

    30 minutes after extubation

  • +22 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group_MRA

EXPERIMENTAL

Recruitment maneuvers and high PEEP

Procedure: Intervention group_MRA

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

No recruitment maneuvers and low PEEP

Procedure: Control group

Interventions

Tidal Volume (Vt) =6-8 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW), Peep=8 cmH2O, recruitment maneuvers=30cm H2O every 30 min after intubation (except during CPB), after any disconnection and at the admission in ICU. Recruitment maneuvers are performed in accordance with the surgical team an if SAP≥90 mmHg or MAP≥65 mmHg. Ventilation is maintained during CPB Vt=2.5 mL/kg, Peep= 5 cmH2O

Also known as: recruitment maneuvers
Intervention group_MRA
Control groupPROCEDURE

Vt=6-8 mL/kg of PBW, Peep=5 cmH2O , No recruitment maneuvers. Ventilation maintained during CPB Vt=2.5 mL/kg, Peep= 5 cmH2O.

Also known as: NO recruitment maneuvers
Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients older than 18 years-old,
  • Evaluated before cardiopulmonary bypass for any cardiac surgical procedure (e.g. coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, aorta, or combined procedures),
  • With a pulmonary risk score ≥ 2
  • Who gave written informed consent
  • affiliated to a social security system

You may not qualify if:

  • BMI \> 40kg/m2 ;
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 35% ;
  • Preoperative shock ;
  • Aortic surgery with planned circulatory arrest ;
  • Minimally invasive cardiac surgery ;
  • Emergency surgery with patient unable to give written informed consent
  • Heart transplantation
  • Mechanical circulatory support surgery
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

CHU Amiens-Picardie

Amiens, France

Location

CHRU Brest

Brest, France

Location

CHU de Dijon

Dijon, France

Location

CHU de Nancy

Nancy, France

Location

CHU Poitiers

Poitiers, France

Location

CHU Rennes

Rennes, France

Location

CHU de Rouen

Rouen, France

Location

CHU Nantes

Saint-Herblain, France

Location

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, France

Location

CHRU Tours

Tours, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Demaure N, Le Cunff J, Duchene M, Rozec B, Espitalier F, Cabon JM, Oilleau JF, Guerci P, Labaste F, Abou-Arab O, Guinot PG, Duval P, Besnier E, Flecher E, Leroyer I, Morcet J, Fougerou-Leurent C, Mansour A, Nesseler N; VACARM investigators; ATLANREA study group. Impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients: the VACARM randomised clinical trial-study protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 29;15(10):e104179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104179.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Control Groups

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Nathalie DEMAURE

    CHU Rennes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nicolas NESSELER, MD

    CHU Rennes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Multicenter, randomized, comparative, parallel-group trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2020

First Posted

May 29, 2020

Study Start

July 8, 2021

Primary Completion

September 16, 2025

Study Completion

September 16, 2025

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be available, after the primary publication of the results, to any researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to dri@chu-rennes.fr. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement; depending on the case, additional formalities may be required.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data availability after the primary publication of the results and until the database is deleted
Access Criteria
Any researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will be able to access the IPD ans supporting information. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement; depending on the case, additional formalities may be required.

Locations